DOJ's $73K Office Furniture Purchase Order to Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. awarded under SAP
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $73,170 ($73.2K)
Contractor: Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2024-09-13
End Date: 2025-09-12
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $201/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FY24 D35 OFFICE FURNITURE
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30342
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $73,170.05 to HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, INC. for work described as: FY24 D35 OFFICE FURNITURE Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a standard procurement process under Simplified Acquisition Procedures. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the nature of the goods and the established vendor. 4. Performance context suggests a routine need for office furnishings. 5. Sector positioning places this within general administrative support services for law enforcement.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $73,170.05 for office furniture seems within a reasonable range for government purchases of this nature. While specific unit pricing is not detailed, the overall award amount for a one-year duration suggests fair market value. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for office furniture indicates that this award is not an outlier, especially considering the vendor's established presence. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the U.S. Marshals Service.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically allows for a broad range of vendors to participate. While the exact number of bids received is not specified, SAP is designed to foster competition for purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold. The use of SAP suggests that the agency sought competitive pricing while maintaining procurement efficiency. The level of competition, though not explicitly detailed, is presumed to be adequate for this type of procurement.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP ensures that taxpayers benefit from competitive pricing, as multiple vendors are generally encouraged to bid. This process helps prevent overspending on routine supplies and services.
Public Impact
The U.S. Marshals Service benefits from this contract through the acquisition of necessary office furniture. Essential services include the provision of office furniture to support operational needs. The geographic impact is primarily within the state of Georgia, where the vendor is located. Workforce implications are indirect, supporting the productivity of federal employees by providing adequate workspace.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for higher prices if competition was limited within SAP.
- Lack of detailed unit pricing makes granular value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a known entity, suggesting reliability.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Procurement under SAP generally aims for competitive pricing.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader category of government procurement for administrative and operational support. The office furniture market is diverse, with many suppliers ranging from large manufacturers to specialized retailers. Federal agencies frequently procure office furnishings to equip workspaces, with spending often distributed across various agencies and departments. Benchmarks for office furniture procurement vary widely based on item type, quantity, and customization, but this award appears to be a standard transaction for equipping office spaces.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed in this award notice. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals, it's difficult to assess the direct benefit to small businesses from this particular purchase order.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this purchase order would typically fall under the Department of Justice's internal procurement regulations and the U.S. Marshals Service's administrative controls. Transparency is provided through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability is maintained through the firm-fixed-price agreement, ensuring the vendor delivers specified goods. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Justice Administrative Services
- Federal Law Enforcement Support Contracts
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule Purchases (if applicable)
- Office Supply and Furniture Procurement
Risk Flags
- Potential for price variance due to SAP competition level.
- Lack of detailed itemization hinders granular cost analysis.
Tags
office-furniture, department-of-justice, u.s.-marshals-service, purchase-order, competed-under-sap, firm-fixed-price, administrative-support, georgia, fy24
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $73,170.05 to HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, INC.. FY24 D35 OFFICE FURNITURE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $73,170.05.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-09-13. End: 2025-09-12.
What is the track record of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts?
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily through purchase orders and smaller agreements. While specific details on past performance metrics for this vendor are not readily available in this summary, their ability to secure this contract with the Department of Justice suggests a satisfactory performance history or at least compliance with federal procurement requirements. Federal agencies often rely on past performance evaluations when making award decisions, especially for routine procurements. Further investigation into their contract history on platforms like FPDS could reveal more about their reliability and experience with government clients.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar federal office furniture procurements?
The value of this contract, approximately $73,170.05, appears to be within a reasonable range for a one-year supply of office furniture for a federal agency like the U.S. Marshals Service. Without specific details on the exact items purchased (e.g., chairs, desks, filing cabinets) and their quantities, a precise unit-cost comparison is challenging. However, federal agencies often procure furniture through various channels, including GSA Schedules, which provide pre-negotiated pricing. Purchases made under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) like this one are typically for amounts below the threshold where more extensive competitive bidding is mandated. Generally, firm-fixed-price contracts aim to provide cost certainty, and this award seems consistent with typical spending for such needs.
What are the primary risks associated with this type of contract?
The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low, given it's for standard office furniture and awarded as a firm-fixed-price purchase order. Potential risks include the possibility of receiving furniture that does not meet quality standards or delivery delays, though these are mitigated by the vendor's established reputation and the contract terms. Another risk could be that the pricing, while competitive under SAP, might not be the absolute lowest achievable if a more extensive bidding process or GSA Schedule utilization had been employed. However, for a purchase of this size and nature, the administrative cost savings of using SAP likely outweigh minor potential price differences.
How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedure (SAP) in ensuring value for taxpayers in this instance?
Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed to streamline the procurement process for purchases below a certain dollar threshold (currently $250,000), balancing efficiency with competition. For this $73,170.05 contract, SAP likely enabled the U.S. Marshals Service to acquire necessary office furniture more quickly and with less administrative burden than a full and open competition. The requirement for competition within SAP, even if less formal than larger procurements, generally ensures that pricing is reasonable. Taxpayers benefit from the efficiency gains, potentially lower administrative costs, and the expectation of competitive pricing achieved through the SAP process, assuming adequate vendor participation.
What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the Department of Justice?
The Department of Justice (DOJ), encompassing numerous agencies like the U.S. Marshals Service, consistently spends significant amounts on office furniture annually. Historical data indicates a pattern of regular procurement to furnish new offices, replace aging equipment, and support personnel growth across its vast operations. Spending often occurs through a mix of contract types, including GSA Schedule orders, competitively bid large contracts, and smaller purchases under SAP. The total annual expenditure can fluctuate based on agency-specific needs, budget allocations, and major construction or relocation projects. This specific $73K award represents a typical, smaller-scale expenditure within the DOJ's broader furniture procurement strategy.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNITURE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 780 JOHNSON FERRY RD STE 800, ATLANTA, GA, 30342
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $73,170
Exercised Options: $73,170
Current Obligation: $73,170
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-09-13
Current End Date: 2025-09-12
Potential End Date: 2025-09-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)