Justice Dept. awards $79.6M FAAS BPA Call to McNeal Professional Services for consulting

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $79,561 ($79.6K)

Contractor: Mcneal Professional Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $219/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FINANCIAL, AUDITING, & ACCOUNTING SUPPORT (FAAS) BPA CALL

Place of Performance

Location: KENNESAW, COBB County, GEORGIA, 30144

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $79,560.95 to MCNEAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FINANCIAL, AUDITING, & ACCOUNTING SUPPORT (FAAS) BPA CALL Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-negotiated agreement for services. 3. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting, a broad category. 4. The contract duration is 364 days, suggesting a short-term or project-specific need. 5. The award value of $79.6 million is significant for consulting services. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific BPA Call is challenging without more granular data on the services provided. The $79.6 million award over approximately one year represents a substantial investment in consulting services. Comparing it to similar FAAS BPAs or specific task orders would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. The Firm Fixed Price structure is generally favorable for the government in managing cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of two bidders indicates some level of competition, though the exact number of proposals received and their quality would provide a clearer picture of the competitive landscape. A higher number of bidders typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of contractors to bid, potentially driving down prices and improving service quality through market forces.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from access to specialized financial, auditing, and accounting support services. These services are crucial for the effective management and oversight of departmental finances. The contract supports administrative management and general management consulting, impacting internal operations. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Justice's operational areas, likely nationwide. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized financial and auditing professionals within the DOJ or through contractor support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the BPA Call's specific deliverables are not tightly defined.
Reliance on a single BPA Call for critical financial services could pose a risk if the contractor underperforms.
The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' could lead to ambiguity in service delivery.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should yield fair pricing.
The use of a BPA Call indicates that pre-negotiated terms and conditions are in place, potentially streamlining service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The Financial, Auditing, and Accounting Support (FAAS) sector encompasses a wide range of services critical to government operations. This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611), a segment of the professional services market. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, with spending often driven by regulatory compliance, financial oversight, and operational efficiency initiatives. Benchmarking this specific award against broader federal consulting spending requires analyzing similar contracts within the Department of Justice and across other agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). McNeal Professional Services, Inc. is likely a large business, given the contract value. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans, but large contracts often include provisions for small business participation. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to directly compete for this prime contract were limited, though they may still participate as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside within the Department of Justice's contracting and program management offices. As a BPA Call, it likely falls under the purview of the existing BPA's oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the BPA Call and the underlying BPA. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if financial impropriety or performance issues warrant investigation.

Related Government Programs

Financial Audit Services
Management Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services
Contracting and Procurement Support
Financial Management Systems

Risk Flags

Limited competition (2 bidders)
Broad service category (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $79,560.95 to MCNEAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC.. FINANCIAL, AUDITING, & ACCOUNTING SUPPORT (FAAS) BPA CALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MCNEAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $79,560.95.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for Financial, Auditing, & Accounting Support (FAAS) services within the Department of Justice?

Analyzing historical spending for FAAS within the Department of Justice requires examining contract data over several fiscal years. Typically, agencies like the DOJ spend significant amounts on these services to ensure compliance, manage budgets, and support investigations. Spending can fluctuate based on specific initiatives, audits, or changes in regulatory requirements. Without access to specific historical DOJ FAAS spending data, it's difficult to provide exact figures. However, it's common for large federal agencies to have multi-million dollar annual expenditures in this category, often through a mix of indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts, blanket purchase agreements (BPAs), and individual task orders.

How does the per-unit cost of services under this BPA Call compare to market rates for similar consulting services?

Determining the per-unit cost benchmark for this BPA Call is challenging without knowing the specific services rendered and their associated labor categories or deliverables. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) award valued at $79.6 million over approximately 364 days. To assess per-unit cost, one would need to break down the total value by hours, deliverables, or specific consulting tasks. Comparing this to market rates would involve benchmarking against industry surveys, other government contracts for similar services (e.g., GSA schedules, other agency BPAs), and potentially commercial consulting rates. Given the FFP nature, the contractor has assumed the cost risk, which often incorporates a margin for uncertainty. A detailed analysis would require access to the task orders issued against this BPA Call.

What is McNeal Professional Services, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Justice?

McNeal Professional Services, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts. To assess their track record specifically with the Department of Justice and for FAAS-related services, a review of their contract performance history, past performance evaluations, and any reported issues or awards would be necessary. Federal procurement data (like FPDS) can reveal the types and values of contracts they have held, their performance ratings, and whether they have successfully completed similar engagements. A positive track record with the DOJ, especially on complex consulting or financial support contracts, would indicate a lower risk for this new BPA Call. Conversely, past performance issues could raise concerns about their ability to deliver effectively.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential underperformance by the contractor, scope creep if deliverables are not clearly defined, and the concentration of critical financial services under one BPA Call. Mitigation strategies include the Department of Justice's robust contract oversight, performance monitoring against defined metrics, and clear statement of work (SOW) for any task orders issued. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a vetting process for the contractor's capabilities. Regular communication and performance reviews are essential to proactively address any emerging issues.

How does the competition level (2 bidders) for this contract potentially impact pricing and service quality?

An award with only two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition. While better than a sole-source award, it may not be as robust as a competition with numerous proposals. With only two bidders, the government has less leverage to negotiate the lowest possible price compared to a scenario with many competing offers. However, the 'full and open' nature means the process was accessible to all. The impact on service quality is also less certain; with fewer competitors, the incentive to differentiate solely on price might be reduced, potentially leading contractors to focus more on meeting minimum requirements. The government's evaluation criteria and the specific capabilities of the two bidders would heavily influence the final outcome.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mcneal Professional Services Inc

Address: 1595 BIG SHANTY DR NW, KENNESAW, GA, 30144

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $159,278

Exercised Options: $159,278

Current Obligation: $79,561

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15JUST24A00000027

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline