DOJ's $13.2K osteopathic services contract awarded via purchase order to Chelsea-Village Medical Office, P.C

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,200 ($13.2K)

Contractor: Chelsea-Village Medical Office, P.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2023-10-17

End Date: 2025-10-16

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: EXPWT SERVICE - OSTEOPATHIC - DR. JONATHAN S. GARAY

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10014

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $13,200 to CHELSEA-VILLAGE MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C. for work described as: EXPWT SERVICE - OSTEOPATHIC - DR. JONATHAN S. GARAY Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a time-and-materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. 2. The contract's value is relatively small, suggesting a niche service requirement. 3. Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and lack of market-driven pricing. 4. The duration of 730 days (2 years) for a purchase order of this value warrants scrutiny. 5. Oversight of this contract will be critical to ensure value for taxpayer funds. 6. The specific service, osteopathic care, is not a core function of the Department of Justice.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $13,200 for two years of osteopathic services is difficult to benchmark without more specific service details. However, given the sole-source nature and the type of service, it is questionable whether this represents optimal value for money. Typically, such specialized medical services, if needed by federal employees, might be accessed through existing government health programs or competitively bid contracts for broader medical support, which could yield better pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as a sole-source purchase order, meaning there was no open competition. This approach is typically used for small-dollar purchases or when a specific vendor is uniquely qualified. However, for medical services, the lack of competition means the government did not explore potential alternative providers or negotiate pricing based on market demand, potentially leading to a higher cost than if it had been competed.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this contract means taxpayers may not be receiving the most cost-effective service. Without bids from other qualified providers, it's impossible to confirm if the negotiated price reflects fair market value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely Department of Justice personnel requiring osteopathic medical services. The service delivered is specialized osteopathic treatment. The geographic impact is limited to the New York area, where the contractor is located. There are no immediate or significant workforce implications stemming from this contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition for specialized medical services may lead to inflated costs.
The sole-source award mechanism bypasses opportunities for better pricing through market exploration.
The contract's purpose (osteopathic services) is outside the typical core mission of the DOJ, raising questions about necessity and procurement strategy.

Positive Signals

The contract is for a specific, potentially necessary medical service for personnel.
The award is to a specific medical practice, suggesting a targeted need.
The purchase order mechanism is suitable for smaller, defined requirements.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare services sector is vast, encompassing a wide range of medical providers. This contract falls under specialized medical services, specifically osteopathic medicine. While the federal government procures significant healthcare services, this particular contract is a very small component. Benchmarking this specific service is challenging without understanding the exact scope of treatment, but generally, the federal government aims for competitive bidding to ensure value in healthcare procurements.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve any small business set-asides, as indicated by 'ss': false and 'sb': false. The award was made directly to Chelsea-Village Medical Office, P.C. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific contract. Therefore, the impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is likely negligible.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of Justice's Offices, Boards and Divisions. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and small dollar value, making public scrutiny less likely. There is no specific mention of an Inspector General's involvement for this particular contract, though the DOJ OIG has broad jurisdiction over DOJ spending.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Medical Services
Federal Employee Health Benefits Program
TRICARE
Veterans Affairs Medical Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may limit price competition.
Time-and-materials pricing can lead to cost uncertainty.
Service type (osteopathic) is outside core DOJ mission.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $13,200 to CHELSEA-VILLAGE MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C.. EXPWT SERVICE - OSTEOPATHIC - DR. JONATHAN S. GARAY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHELSEA-VILLAGE MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13,200.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-10-17. End: 2025-10-16.

What is the specific scope of osteopathic services being provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact scope of osteopathic services. It is listed as 'EXPWT SERVICE - OSTEOPATHIC - DR. JONATHAN S. GARAY'. This could range from diagnostic evaluations to therapeutic treatments. Without a detailed statement of work, it is difficult to assess the necessity and appropriateness of the services being procured. Further inquiry with the Department of Justice would be needed to obtain the specific service details and ensure they align with the needs of the personnel and the agency's mission.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis instead of through full and open competition?

The data indicates the contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED' and 'sole-source'. Typically, sole-source awards are justified when only one responsible source can provide the required supply or service. For medical services, this might occur if Dr. Jonathan S. Garay at Chelsea-Village Medical Office, P.C. possesses unique qualifications, specialized equipment, or is the only provider in a specific geographic area accessible to DOJ personnel. However, the rationale for this sole-source determination is not provided and warrants further investigation to ensure fair and reasonable pricing and to confirm that competition was indeed not feasible.

How does the time-and-materials pricing structure impact the potential cost to taxpayers?

A time-and-materials (T&M) contract, like the one used here, pays the contractor for the actual cost of direct labor and materials, plus a fee or profit. While flexible, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns if not closely monitored. For taxpayers, this means the final cost is not fixed upfront and can exceed initial estimates if the work takes longer than expected or requires more materials. Effective oversight, including detailed tracking of hours and materials, is crucial to control costs and ensure value under a T&M arrangement.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar osteopathic services within the Department of Justice?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for similar osteopathic services within the Department of Justice. This contract, valued at $13,200 over two years, appears to be a relatively small expenditure. Without historical data, it's challenging to determine if this represents an increase or decrease in spending for such services. A broader analysis of DOJ's procurement history for medical services, particularly specialized ones, would be necessary to establish a trend and benchmark this contract effectively.

Are there any performance metrics or quality assurance measures associated with this contract?

The provided data does not detail specific performance metrics or quality assurance measures for this contract. For a medical service contract, especially one awarded on a sole-source basis, it is essential to have clear standards for service quality, patient outcomes, and provider conduct. The absence of this information raises concerns about accountability. The Department of Justice should have internal procedures to monitor the quality of care provided and ensure patient satisfaction, even if not explicitly detailed in the contract award notice.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 314 W 14TH ST, NEW YORK, NY, 10014

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,200

Exercised Options: $13,200

Current Obligation: $13,200

Actual Outlays: $13,334

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline