DOJ awards $4.46M sole-source contract for expert witness services to TELEFORE LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,461 ($4.5K)
Contractor: Telefore LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2023-08-11
End Date: 2025-08-10
Contract Duration: 730 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: EXPERT WITNESS
Place of Performance
Location: KINGS PARK, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11754
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $4,460.75 to TELEFORE LLC for work described as: EXPERT WITNESS Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about competition and potential value. 2. Services are for expert witness support, a critical but potentially high-cost function. 3. The contract duration of two years suggests a sustained need for these services. 4. Awarded as a purchase order, indicating a potentially less formal procurement process. 5. The contractor, TELEFORE LLC, is the sole recipient, highlighting a lack of broader market engagement. 6. The 'All Other Legal Services' NAICS code is broad, making direct comparisons challenging.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $4.46 million for expert witness services over two years warrants scrutiny. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar government contracts. The 'time and materials' pricing structure can also lead to cost overruns if not carefully managed. Further analysis would require understanding the specific services rendered and comparing them to industry standards for expert witness testimony in legal proceedings.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This indicates that the Department of Justice likely identified TELEFORE LLC as the only capable provider for these specific expert witness services. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to achieve the best possible price and terms.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards mean taxpayers may not be receiving the most cost-effective solution, as there was no opportunity for multiple vendors to bid and drive down prices.
Public Impact
The Department of Justice benefits from specialized expert witness support for its legal cases. Legal proceedings requiring expert testimony in areas covered by 'All Other Legal Services' will be supported. The geographic impact is primarily within New York, where the contractor is located. The contract supports the operational needs of the Offices, Boards and Divisions within the DOJ.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price discovery and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Lack of competition raises concerns about whether the most qualified or cost-effective vendor was selected.
- Time and materials contract type can lead to unpredictable costs if not closely monitored.
Positive Signals
- Contract addresses a specific need for expert witness services within the DOJ.
- Award to a single entity suggests a potentially specialized capability required for the services.
Sector Analysis
The legal services sector is characterized by specialized expertise and varying pricing models. Expert witness services are a niche within this sector, often commanding high fees due to the specialized knowledge and testimony required in legal proceedings. Government contracts for legal services can range from large-scale litigation support to specific expert consultations. Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without more detail on the specific expertise provided and the complexity of the cases it supports.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not competed and there is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Therefore, it is unlikely to have a direct positive impact on the small business ecosystem. The focus appears to be on fulfilling a specific service need with a particular contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
As a purchase order, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of Justice. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. There is no explicit mention of specific enhanced oversight mechanisms or inspector general jurisdiction beyond standard government contract monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Legal Services Contracts
- Expert Witness Services
- Department of Justice Procurement
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Time and materials pricing
Tags
legal-services, expert-witness, department-of-justice, purchase-order, not-competed, sole-source, time-and-materials, new-york, telefore-llc, legal-services-other
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $4,460.75 to TELEFORE LLC. EXPERT WITNESS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TELEFORE LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4,460.75.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-08-11. End: 2025-08-10.
What specific expertise does TELEFORE LLC provide as an expert witness, and how does this justify a sole-source award?
The provided data indicates the NAICS code is 541199, 'All Other Legal Services.' This broad classification suggests TELEFORE LLC provides legal services that do not fit into more specific categories. For a sole-source award to be justified, the Department of Justice would need to demonstrate that TELEFORE LLC possesses unique qualifications, specialized knowledge, or proprietary information essential for the expert witness role that no other vendor can provide. This could include specific technical expertise, extensive experience in a niche legal area, or a pre-existing relationship with the case that makes their continued involvement indispensable. Without this detailed justification from the agency, the sole-source award remains questionable regarding fair competition and optimal value.
How does the $4.46 million contract value compare to typical government spending on expert witness services?
Benchmarking the $4.46 million contract value for expert witness services is challenging without more specific details about the nature of the expertise and the scope of work. Government spending on expert witnesses can vary significantly based on the complexity of litigation, the duration of testimony, and the specialized field. Contracts for expert witnesses can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the case. Given this is a sole-source award for two years, the value suggests a significant and ongoing need for specialized expertise within the Department of Justice. However, without competitive bids, it's impossible to definitively state if this represents a fair market price or if taxpayers are receiving optimal value compared to what could have been achieved through competition.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for expert witness services?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for expert witness services is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition. When only one vendor is considered, there is less incentive for them to offer their most competitive rates. Additionally, there's a risk that the government may not be engaging the most qualified or suitable expert if a broader market search was not conducted. The 'time and materials' pricing structure, common in such contracts, also introduces risk of cost overruns if not meticulously managed and monitored by the agency. Finally, sole-source awards can raise perceptions of impropriety or favoritism, even if the award is justified.
What is the historical spending pattern for expert witness services by the Department of Justice?
Historical spending patterns for expert witness services by the Department of Justice (DOJ) are not detailed in the provided data. However, it is generally understood that the DOJ, like other large federal litigating agencies, frequently requires expert witness testimony across a wide array of legal disciplines. This spending can fluctuate year-to-year based on caseload, the complexity of cases, and the specific needs of various divisions. Analyzing past spending would require access to historical procurement data, looking at the number of expert witness contracts awarded, their values, and the types of services procured. This specific $4.46 million award represents a significant single contract, but its place within the DOJ's overall historical expenditure on such services would require a broader data analysis.
What oversight mechanisms are in place for this 'time and materials' contract to ensure cost control?
For a 'time and materials' contract, oversight mechanisms are crucial to control costs. The Department of Justice would typically rely on the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) to closely monitor the contractor's labor hours, material costs, and overall progress. This involves regular reporting from the contractor, verification of hours worked, and ensuring that the services provided align with the contract's objectives and are necessary. The COR plays a vital role in approving invoices and ensuring that the 'time and materials' are reasonable and allocable to the contract. Without robust monitoring and clear performance metrics, 'time and materials' contracts can be susceptible to cost overruns, making diligent oversight paramount.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14 BRISTOL LN, KINGS PARK, NY, 11754
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,461
Exercised Options: $4,461
Current Obligation: $4,461
Actual Outlays: $4,461
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-08-11
Current End Date: 2025-08-10
Potential End Date: 2025-08-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)