DOJ awards $38.9K contract for court reporting services to Foxforrest Enterprises Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,876 ($38.9K)

Contractor: Foxforrest Enterprises Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-01-01

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $107/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: GRAND JURY AND DEPOSITION COURT REPORTING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32801

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $38,876.3 to FOXFORREST ENTERPRISES INC for work described as: GRAND JURY AND DEPOSITION COURT REPORTING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential court reporting services, supporting legal proceedings. 2. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 3. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially efficient procurement process. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. Geographic focus on Florida for service delivery. 6. Contract duration aligns with annual operational needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $38,876.30 for a full year of court reporting services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for court reporting services across federal agencies suggests that pricing for this type of support can vary significantly based on location, duration, and specific requirements. Without detailed service level agreements or volume metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the amount is not indicative of overspending for a single-award delivery order.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which is typical for procurements under the federal micro-purchase threshold or for smaller value contracts. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' generally implies that multiple offers were solicited and considered, allowing for price discovery and competition. This method aims to ensure fair and reasonable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Competing this contract, even under SAP, likely resulted in a more competitive price than a sole-source award, benefiting taxpayers by ensuring funds are used efficiently for necessary services.

Public Impact

Federal courts and legal offices within the Department of Justice benefit from timely and accurate transcription of proceedings. Services include court reporting and stenotype services, crucial for legal documentation and record-keeping. The geographic impact is primarily within Florida, where the services will be delivered. The contract supports a specialized professional workforce in the court reporting field.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess service quality.
Limited detail on the number of bidders restricts a full understanding of competitive intensity.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded through a competed process, suggesting potential for good value.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Clear service description (Court Reporting and Stenotype Services) indicates a well-defined need.

Sector Analysis

The market for court reporting services is a specialized segment within the broader professional services industry. This contract falls under the NAICS code 561492 (Court Reporting and Stenotype Services). The federal government is a significant consumer of these services to support judicial proceedings, depositions, and hearings across various agencies, particularly the Department of Justice and the judiciary. Spending in this sector is driven by the volume of legal activity and the need for accurate, verbatim records.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor does it specify subcontracting requirements. Given the small contract value, it is plausible that small businesses were encouraged to bid, but without explicit set-aside information, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were mandated or utilized.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant program managers within the Department of Justice's Offices, Boards and Divisions. Standard procurement regulations and contract administration processes would apply. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General oversight may be triggered by allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Legal Services Contracts
Federal Court Transcription Services
Professional Services Contracts
Simplified Acquisition Procedures Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues if contractor lacks sufficient resources.
Risk of inaccurate or delayed transcriptions impacting legal proceedings.
Limited visibility into specific performance metrics without further data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $38,876.3 to FOXFORREST ENTERPRISES INC. GRAND JURY AND DEPOSITION COURT REPORTING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOXFORREST ENTERPRISES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38,876.3.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-01. End: 2025-12-31.

What is the typical track record of Foxforrest Enterprises Inc. with federal contracts?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to assess Foxforrest Enterprises Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Without access to this specific data, it is impossible to comment on their reliability or past performance. However, the award of this contract suggests they met the basic qualifications and requirements set forth by the Department of Justice for this procurement.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar court reporting services procured by the federal government?

Benchmarking this $38,876.30 contract against similar federal court reporting services requires access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts. Factors such as geographic location, specific service requirements (e.g., real-time transcription, daily copy, rough drafts), and contract duration significantly influence pricing. Generally, firm-fixed-price contracts aim for competitive pricing. Given the relatively modest total value for a year's service, it suggests either a limited scope of work or potentially competitive pricing, but a definitive comparison requires more detailed data on service volumes and market rates.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract likely include potential performance issues (e.g., missed deadlines, inaccurate transcripts), contractor default, or cost overruns if the scope expands beyond initial expectations (though less likely with a Firm Fixed Price). Mitigation strategies typically involve clear performance standards in the contract, regular communication between the contractor and the government, and the government's right to inspect services. The Firm Fixed Price structure itself mitigates financial risk for the government, ensuring the cost is known upfront, provided the scope remains unchanged.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedure (SAP) in ensuring value for money for contracts of this size?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed to streamline the procurement process for smaller value contracts, aiming to reduce administrative burden and speed up delivery while still promoting competition. For contracts like this one, valued under the federal micro-purchase threshold or within the SAP range, it generally ensures fair and reasonable pricing through competition among multiple offerors. While SAP may not involve the extensive documentation or analysis of larger procurements, it strikes a balance between efficiency and ensuring taxpayer value for routine purchases.

What is the historical spending pattern for court reporting services within the Department of Justice?

Historical spending on court reporting services by the Department of Justice (DOJ) would likely show consistent demand driven by the volume of legal proceedings across its various divisions and U.S. Attorney's Offices. Annual spending can fluctuate based on caseloads, specific litigation needs, and the availability of in-house resources versus contracted services. Analyzing past years' data would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured (e.g., transcription, real-time reporting), and the primary contracting vehicles used, such as GSA schedules or direct solicitations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Business Support Services › Court Reporting and Stenotype Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9987 INDIGO BAY CIR, ORLANDO, FL, 32832

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,651

Exercised Options: $42,651

Current Obligation: $38,876

Actual Outlays: $38,876

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15JA0520D00000164

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline