DOJ awards $3.3M for Leadership Skills Assessment services to AON Consulting, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,343,084 ($3.3M)

Contractor: AON Consulting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2024-03-15

End Date: 2027-03-14

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LEADERSHIP SKILLS ASSESSMENT (LSA)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3.3 million to AON CONSULTING, INC. for work described as: LEADERSHIP SKILLS ASSESSMENT (LSA) Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 3. A fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. The duration of the contract is approximately 3 years. 5. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, indicating it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to a standard consulting service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.34 million for a 3-year period for leadership skills assessment services appears within a reasonable range for specialized consulting. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work and deliverables. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit cost of assessments or consultant hours to industry standards.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While two bidders participated, it's unclear if this represents the full extent of market interest or if other potential bidders chose not to participate. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and services, potentially leading to cost savings and better value.

Public Impact

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) personnel will benefit from leadership skills assessment. The services delivered will support management and leadership development within the FBI. The contract's geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia. The contract supports the FBI's human capital management and leadership pipeline.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition with only two bidders could potentially lead to higher prices than a more robustly competed contract.
The specific deliverables and success metrics for the leadership assessment are not detailed, making it hard to gauge performance outcomes.
Reliance on a single delivery order under a potentially larger IDIQ structure might obscure the total spending and competition for the underlying services.

Positive Signals

The use of a firm fixed-price contract helps to lock in costs and protect against cost overruns.
Awarding under full and open competition ensures a broad base of potential contractors were considered.
The contract duration of nearly three years allows for consistent application and potential long-term impact of the assessment services.

Sector Analysis

The Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541611) is a significant market within federal contracting. This contract for leadership skills assessment falls within the broader human capital and organizational development consulting space. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to enhance leadership capabilities, improve organizational efficiency, and support strategic initiatives. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and priorities, but typically involves specialized expertise.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved a small business set-aside. Given the nature of specialized consulting services, it is possible that larger, established firms are more likely to compete. Further investigation into subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would be necessary to assess their involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency regarding the specific scope of work and performance metrics would enhance accountability. The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General may have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if concerns arise.

Related Government Programs

Management and Technical Consulting Services
Human Capital Management Services
Leadership Development Programs
Organizational Effectiveness Consulting

Risk Flags

Limited competition observed.
Scope of work and specific deliverables not detailed.
Performance metrics not explicitly stated.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3.3 million to AON CONSULTING, INC.. LEADERSHIP SKILLS ASSESSMENT (LSA)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AON CONSULTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-03-15. End: 2027-03-14.

What is the track record of AON Consulting, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in leadership assessment services?

AON Consulting, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts. While specific details on their past performance in leadership assessment services for the FBI or similar agencies would require a deeper dive into contract databases and performance reports, their presence as a bidder and awardee suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. Federal agencies typically vet contractors based on past performance, technical capabilities, and financial stability. A review of their contract history would reveal the types of services provided, contract values, and any performance ratings or issues encountered on previous federal engagements.

How does the $3.34 million contract value compare to similar leadership assessment contracts awarded by the FBI or other law enforcement agencies?

Benchmarking the $3.34 million contract value requires comparing it to similar leadership assessment contracts awarded by the FBI or other federal law enforcement agencies over a comparable timeframe and for a similar duration (approximately 3 years). Without access to a comprehensive database of all such contracts, a precise comparison is challenging. However, this value appears moderate for specialized consulting services supporting a large federal agency. Factors influencing the value include the number of individuals assessed, the complexity of the assessment tools used, the level of reporting and analysis required, and the specific expertise of the contractor. A higher number of participants or more in-depth analysis would naturally increase the contract value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this leadership skills assessment contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this leadership skills assessment contract. Typically, for such services, KPIs might include the accuracy and reliability of the assessments, the actionable insights provided to leadership, the perceived fairness and utility of the process by participants, and the extent to which the assessments contribute to identifying high-potential leaders or areas for development. The contract's success would likely be measured by the FBI's satisfaction with the delivered services and whether the assessments effectively support their talent management and leadership development goals. A review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to identify these specific metrics.

What is the historical spending pattern for leadership skills assessment services by the Department of Justice or the FBI?

Historical spending patterns for leadership skills assessment services by the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are not detailed in the provided data. To ascertain these patterns, one would need to analyze historical contract awards for similar services over several fiscal years. This analysis would involve searching federal procurement databases for contracts with relevant NAICS codes (like 541611) and keywords related to leadership assessment, executive coaching, or talent management. Understanding historical spending can reveal trends in demand, identify key contractors, and provide context for the current contract's value and duration. It can also highlight whether this is a recurring need or a new initiative.

Are there any specific risks associated with using AON Consulting, Inc. for these services, based on their past performance or the nature of the contract?

Based solely on the provided data, there are no explicit risks highlighted regarding AON Consulting, Inc.'s past performance for this specific contract. However, general risks associated with consulting contracts include potential scope creep, challenges in measuring the direct impact of assessments on leadership effectiveness, and reliance on contractor expertise. For this particular contract, risks might include the possibility that the chosen assessment tools may not be perfectly aligned with the FBI's unique leadership requirements, or that the interpretation and application of assessment results could be subjective. A thorough review of AON's federal contract performance history, including any past issues or disputes, would be necessary to identify any specific contractor-related risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15F06724R0000035

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2001 K ST NW STE 625N, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,741,284

Exercised Options: $3,343,084

Current Obligation: $3,343,084

Actual Outlays: $3,043,443

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA21D0072

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline