DOJ awards $3.5M to Robert Almonte, LLC for professional development training

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,500 ($3.5K)

Contractor: Robert Almonte, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-22

End Date: 2027-04-21

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TITLE: 26-S-099/ALMONTE CONSULTING/CONFERENCE/LPR-DXD

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BLISS, EL PASO County, TEXAS, 79918

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3,500 to ROBERT ALMONTE, LLC for work described as: TITLE: 26-S-099/ALMONTE CONSULTING/CONFERENCE/LPR-DXD Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Robert Almonte, LLC for $3.5M. 2. Training services are for the Drug Enforcement Administration. 3. Contract duration is 364 days. 4. Procurement method was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP'.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $3.5M for 364 days of training appears high for professional development. Benchmarking against similar government or commercial training contracts is needed to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under SAP, suggesting a limited competition approach. This method may not have yielded the best price discovery or value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of full and open competition could result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for professional development services due to limited competition. The DEA's training needs are being met, but at potentially inflated costs. Transparency in the procurement process is limited, raising questions about fairness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition
Potentially high cost
Lack of transparency

Positive Signals

Specific vendor selected
Training needs addressed

Sector Analysis

The IT and professional services sector sees significant government spending on training and development. Benchmarks for similar contracts are crucial for assessing cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve small businesses, as it was awarded to Robert Almonte, LLC. Further analysis would be needed to confirm if any subcontracting opportunities exist.

Oversight & Accountability

The procurement process, being 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP', warrants further oversight to ensure fair pricing and adherence to regulations. Accountability for the selection and pricing is key.

Related Government Programs

Professional and Management Development Training
Department of Justice Contracting
Drug Enforcement Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Limited transparency in procurement
High dollar value for a single-source award

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3,500 to ROBERT ALMONTE, LLC. TITLE: 26-S-099/ALMONTE CONSULTING/CONFERENCE/LPR-DXD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROBERT ALMONTE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-22. End: 2027-04-21.

What is the specific nature of the professional and management development training provided, and how does it align with DEA's strategic goals?

The training focuses on professional and management development, crucial for enhancing leadership and operational effectiveness within the DEA. Specific modules likely cover areas such as strategic planning, team management, and administrative best practices, directly supporting the agency's mission to combat drug trafficking and related crimes by equipping personnel with advanced skills.

What justification was provided for not competing this contract under SAP, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?

The justification for not competing under SAP is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, this could be due to specific requirements, urgency, or a limited number of qualified sources. To ensure fair pricing, the agency should have conducted market research, obtained quotes from other potential vendors if possible, or used historical pricing data as a reference point.

How will the effectiveness of this training be measured, and what are the expected outcomes for the DEA?

Effectiveness will likely be measured through post-training assessments, participant feedback surveys, and potentially through observed improvements in job performance or the application of learned skills. Expected outcomes include enhanced leadership capabilities, improved team collaboration, better decision-making, and ultimately, a more efficient and effective DEA workforce contributing to national security and public safety.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9627 MULBERRY WAY, HELOTES, TX, 78023

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,500

Exercised Options: $3,500

Current Obligation: $3,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline