DOJ awards $23.6K for temporary help services to Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,595 ($23.6K)

Contractor: Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-27

End Date: 2026-05-04

Contract Duration: 7 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TITLE: PINECREST PHARMACY, DOCKET NO. 26-5 REQUESTOR: RICARDO T DEBRITO REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ22A00000003 POP DATES: 04/27/2026 TO 05/04/2026

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20009

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $23,595 to NEAL R. GROSS AND COMPANY, INC. for work described as: TITLE: PINECREST PHARMACY, DOCKET NO. 26-5 REQUESTOR: RICARDO T DEBRITO REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ22A00000003 POP DATES: 04/27/2026 TO 05/04/2026 Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused need for temporary staffing. 2. The award was made under a BPA Call, indicating it's part of a larger pre-competed agreement. 3. The duration of the contract is very short (7 days), pointing to an immediate or short-term requirement. 4. The contract was awarded on a Firm Fixed Price basis, providing cost certainty. 5. The geographic location is Washington D.C., a common hub for federal agencies. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this specific award.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $23,595 for 7 days of temporary help services appears reasonable for specialized administrative support. Benchmarking against similar short-term staffing contracts within the federal government is difficult due to the highly variable nature of temporary services and specific skill requirements. However, the firm fixed price structure suggests a defined scope of work, which aids in assessing value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' via a BPA Call. This implies that the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) was competed broadly, but this specific call-out might have had limited participants or a specific justification for excluding other sources. The number of bidders for this specific call is not provided, but the 'after exclusion of sources' suggests a narrower competition than full and open.

Taxpayer Impact: While the initial BPA likely involved broad competition, the exclusion of sources for this specific call could mean less competitive pressure on pricing for this particular task order, potentially leading to slightly higher costs for taxpayers than if it were fully open.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice, specifically the Drug Enforcement Administration, benefits from this contract by obtaining necessary temporary staffing. Temporary administrative or specialized support services are delivered. The services are geographically focused within the District of Columbia. The contract supports the agency's operational needs by filling short-term staffing gaps.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition for this specific call-out could impact price discovery.
Short contract duration may indicate reactive rather than strategic staffing.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a pre-competed BPA, suggesting initial vetting of sources.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for this task.
Award to an established entity (Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc.) may indicate reliability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically Temporary Help Services (NAICS 561320). This sector is crucial for government agencies needing flexible staffing solutions to manage fluctuating workloads or specialized skill requirements. The overall market for temporary staffing services is substantial, with numerous providers competing for federal contracts. This award represents a small fraction of that market.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award. Given the small value and short duration, the direct impact on small businesses is likely minimal unless Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc. utilizes small businesses in its subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Drug Enforcement Administration's contracting officers and program managers. As it's a BPA Call, the underlying BPA likely has established oversight mechanisms. Transparency is moderate, with the award details being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Temporary Staffing Services
Administrative Support Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Department of Justice Contracts
Drug Enforcement Administration Procurements

Risk Flags

Limited competition for task order
Short contract duration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $23,595 to NEAL R. GROSS AND COMPANY, INC.. TITLE: PINECREST PHARMACY, DOCKET NO. 26-5 REQUESTOR: RICARDO T DEBRITO REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ22A00000003 POP DATES: 04/27/2026 TO 05/04/2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NEAL R. GROSS AND COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23,595.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-27. End: 2026-05-04.

What is the track record of Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc. with the federal government?

Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily for services related to administrative support, transcription, and temporary staffing. Data indicates they have been awarded numerous contracts across various agencies, including the Department of Justice, Department of Defense, and others. Their performance history, as reflected in contract databases, suggests a consistent ability to secure and fulfill government requirements. Specific details on past performance ratings or any significant issues would require deeper analysis of individual contract close-outs and performance evaluations, but their continued presence in the federal contracting space indicates a generally acceptable track record.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar temporary staffing awards by the DEA?

The value of this specific contract ($23,595 for 7 days) is relatively low, characteristic of short-term, task-specific needs rather than large-scale, long-term staffing solutions. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal agencies often award larger contracts for temporary staffing that can run into hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars over longer periods. This particular award, made via a BPA Call, suggests it's a supplementary or immediate need. Comparing it directly to other DEA temporary staffing awards requires filtering for contracts of similar duration and scope, but generally, this appears to be a minor expenditure within the agency's broader staffing procurement strategy.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of temporary staffing contract?

The primary risks associated with this type of temporary staffing contract include potential misalignment between the temporary staff's skills and the agency's actual needs, leading to reduced productivity or the need for additional training. There's also a risk of the temporary staff not integrating well with the permanent workforce, impacting morale or workflow. For the government, risks include over-reliance on temporary staff, potential for increased costs if the need extends beyond the initial contract period, and ensuring compliance with labor laws and agency policies. Given the short duration and firm fixed price, some of these risks are mitigated, but ensuring the quality and suitability of the personnel remains key.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation imply for this award?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies that the initial Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) was competed broadly under full and open competition. However, for this specific task order (BPA Call), certain sources were excluded from consideration. This exclusion could be based on various factors, such as specific capabilities required, geographic limitations, or prior performance issues with excluded vendors. While the underlying BPA likely benefited from robust competition, this specific call-out suggests a more tailored competition among a pre-selected group of vendors, potentially limiting the number of bidders and the extent of price discovery compared to a standard full and open competition for the task order itself.

What is the typical duration and value range for temporary help services contracts awarded by the DEA?

The typical duration and value range for temporary help services contracts awarded by the DEA can vary significantly based on the specific requirements. Short-term needs, like the 7-day duration of this contract, might be for immediate backfills or specific short-term projects, often valued in the tens of thousands of dollars. However, the DEA also procures longer-term temporary staffing solutions, potentially spanning months or years and valued at hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars, to support ongoing operational needs or specialized functions. This particular award falls at the lower end of the spectrum, indicating a very specific and limited-duration requirement.

How does the use of a BPA Call affect the oversight and accountability for this contract?

The use of a BPA Call means that the primary competition and vetting of the vendor (Neal R. Gross and Company, Inc.) occurred when the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) was established. This BPA likely underwent a rigorous full and open competition. For this specific call, oversight focuses on ensuring the task order aligns with the terms of the BPA, that the pricing is fair and reasonable within the BPA's framework, and that the services are delivered as specified. Accountability rests with the issuing agency (DEA) to manage the BPA and its calls effectively. While the initial BPA competition provides a layer of accountability, the specific call-out requires ongoing monitoring by the contracting officer's representative (COR) to ensure performance and compliance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Employment Services › Temporary Help Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1716 14TH ST NW STE 201, WASHINGTON, DC, 20009

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,595

Exercised Options: $23,595

Current Obligation: $23,595

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15DDHQ22A00000003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline