DOJ's $260K Office Furniture Contract Awarded to Steelcase Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $259,669 ($259.7K)

Contractor: Steelcase Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2027-04-02

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $713/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OFFICE FURNITURE (EXCEPT WOOD) MANUFACTURING

Place of Performance

Location: GRAND RAPIDS, KENT County, MICHIGAN, 49501

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $259,669.29 to STEELCASE INC. for work described as: OFFICE FURNITURE (EXCEPT WOOD) MANUFACTURING Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Contract duration of one year with potential for renewal indicates ongoing needs. 4. The contract falls under the manufacturing of office furniture, a standard procurement category. 5. Performance is managed by the Drug Enforcement Administration, a component of the Department of Justice. 6. The award is a BPA Call, suggesting it's an order against a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $260,000 for office furniture is modest. As a firm-fixed-price award under full and open competition, it suggests a competitive pricing environment. Benchmarking against similar furniture procurements would provide a more precise value assessment, but the structure implies a fair market price was sought. The specific items procured under this BPA Call would further inform the value analysis.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically leads to a more robust price discovery process as multiple vendors compete. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a healthy level of competition was likely achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through vendor rivalry, ensuring the government receives competitive rates for its purchases.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the Drug Enforcement Administration will benefit from new or replacement office furniture. The services delivered include the manufacturing and supply of office furniture. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the operational areas of the DEA. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the supply chain and delivery of furniture.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the furniture items procured makes it difficult to assess if the best value was obtained.
The duration of the contract (one year) may require future competitive procurements, leading to administrative overhead.
No information is provided on sustainability or environmental considerations in the furniture manufacturing.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
The contractor, Steelcase Inc., is a well-established manufacturer in the office furniture industry.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector is a mature industry with established players. This contract falls within the broader manufacturing and professional services categories for government procurement. Spending on office furniture is a recurring need for federal agencies to maintain operational facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific types and quantities of furniture acquired.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (sb=false). There is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely limited.

Oversight & Accountability

As a BPA Call, oversight would be managed by the issuing agency (Department of Justice, specifically the Drug Enforcement Administration) against the terms of the parent BPA. Accountability is ensured through the firm-fixed-price structure and the contract's performance period. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract award data.

Related Government Programs

Office Supplies and Equipment
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules
Furniture and Furnishings

Risk Flags

Potential for price not being the absolute lowest if competition was limited to a few bidders.
Risk of furniture not meeting specific ergonomic or long-term durability needs without detailed specifications.
Dependence on a single manufacturer (Steelcase Inc.) for this specific BPA Call.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $259,669.29 to STEELCASE INC.. OFFICE FURNITURE (EXCEPT WOOD) MANUFACTURING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STEELCASE INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $259,669.29.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2027-04-02.

What is the track record of Steelcase Inc. in fulfilling federal government contracts for office furniture?

Steelcase Inc. is a major manufacturer of office furniture and has a history of supplying products to the federal government. While specific details of past performance on federal contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their established presence in the market suggests experience in meeting government procurement requirements. Federal agencies often utilize GSA Schedules or other competitive vehicles to procure furniture from large manufacturers like Steelcase. A deeper dive into contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would reveal the volume and types of contracts Steelcase has held with various federal agencies, including their performance history and any reported issues.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar office furniture?

The provided data does not include the specific items or quantities of office furniture procured, making a direct price comparison to market rates challenging. However, the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' and is a 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' type. This structure generally indicates that the government sought competitive bids, and the price is fixed regardless of Steelcase's actual costs. To assess value, one would need to compare the unit prices of the specific furniture items (e.g., chairs, desks, filing cabinets) against catalog prices or quotes from other reputable office furniture suppliers for comparable quality and features. The total award amount of $259,669.29 provides a ceiling, but the actual value depends on the quantity and type of goods delivered.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract are related to potential overpricing if the competition was not robust enough, or if the specific furniture items procured do not meet the long-term needs or quality expectations of the DEA. Delivery delays or issues with product quality could also pose risks, although the firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty. Given that this is a BPA Call, there's a risk that the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement may not have had sufficiently stringent terms. Finally, a lack of detailed specifications in the award data makes it difficult to fully assess the risk of receiving suboptimal furniture solutions.

How effective is the Drug Enforcement Administration in managing its office furniture procurements?

The provided data focuses solely on a single contract award and does not offer sufficient information to assess the overall effectiveness of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in managing its office furniture procurements. Effectiveness would typically be measured by factors such as adherence to budget, timely delivery, user satisfaction with the furniture, and the efficiency of the procurement process itself. The fact that this award was made under full and open competition and is a firm-fixed-price contract suggests adherence to standard procurement best practices. However, without historical data on DEA's furniture procurement performance, user feedback, or audit reports, a definitive assessment of their effectiveness cannot be made.

What are the historical spending patterns for office furniture by the Department of Justice or the DEA?

The provided data snippet only contains information for a single contract award valued at approximately $260,000. It does not provide any historical spending patterns for office furniture by the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). To analyze historical spending, one would need to access comprehensive federal procurement databases (e.g., FPDS) and query for all contracts related to office furniture awarded by these entities over several fiscal years. This would allow for the identification of trends in spending volume, average contract values, primary contractors, and the types of furniture procured, providing insights into the scale and consistency of their furniture acquisition efforts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 901, 44TH STREET SOUTH EAST, GRAND RAPIDS, MI, 49508

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $259,669

Exercised Options: $259,669

Current Obligation: $259,669

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15DDHQ25A00000032

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline