DOJ's $531K elevator maintenance contract for 320 1st NW Building awarded to Quality Elevator Co., LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $53,170 ($53.2K)

Contractor: Quality Elevator CO., LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $146/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE 320 1ST NW BUILDING. FOR FISCAL YEAR 26'. EFFECTIVE 10/1/2025.

Place of Performance

Location: BLADENSBURG, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20710

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $53,170 to QUALITY ELEVATOR CO., LLC for work described as: ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE 320 1ST NW BUILDING. FOR FISCAL YEAR 26'. EFFECTIVE 10/1/2025. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential building services, ensuring operational continuity. 2. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 3. Competition under SAP suggests a streamlined procurement process. 4. Contract duration of one year aligns with annual budgeting cycles. 5. Geographic location in Maryland indicates a focus on regional facilities. 6. Small business status of the contractor was not a primary set-aside factor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $531,700 for a one-year elevator maintenance service appears reasonable for a federal building of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support services in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area would provide a more precise assessment. However, given the firm fixed-price structure, the government has a clear understanding of the cost, which is a positive indicator of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a competitive process for acquisitions below the simplified acquisition threshold. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally encourages broad participation. This method aims to balance efficiency with competition, ensuring fair pricing and access for qualified vendors.

Taxpayer Impact: Competition under SAP helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a market-driven price for essential services, preventing overpayment.

Public Impact

Ensures the safe and reliable operation of elevators within the 320 1st NW Building, a key facility for the Department of Justice. Supports the daily functions of federal employees and visitors by maintaining critical vertical transportation systems. Benefits the local economy through the provision of specialized maintenance services. Maintains the structural integrity and operational readiness of federal property.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data.
Potential for increased costs if unforeseen major repairs are required beyond routine maintenance.
Dependence on a single contractor for a critical building system.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Competitive award process suggests a fair market price was obtained.
Contract duration aligns with typical federal fiscal year planning.

Sector Analysis

Elevator maintenance falls under the broader facilities support services sector, which is a critical component of government operations. This sector includes a wide range of services necessary to maintain federal buildings and infrastructure. The market for such services is generally stable, driven by the continuous need to preserve government assets. Spending in this area is consistent across various federal agencies to ensure operational readiness.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the procurement was open to all eligible offerors, and the award was based on the best value proposition rather than a specific small business preference. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed but would depend on the prime contractor's practices.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of Justice, ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by locking in costs. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance monitoring details are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Facilities Support Services
General Services Administration (GSA) Contracts
Department of Justice Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen repair costs beyond fixed-price scope.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical building function.
Limited public data on contractor's specific federal performance history.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $53,170 to QUALITY ELEVATOR CO., LLC. ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE 320 1ST NW BUILDING. FOR FISCAL YEAR 26'. EFFECTIVE 10/1/2025.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is QUALITY ELEVATOR CO., LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $53,170.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Quality Elevator Co., LLC with federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Quality Elevator Co., LLC with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes with previous government engagements. This would help determine their reliability, experience, and ability to meet federal standards for elevator maintenance services. Without this historical data, it is difficult to fully gauge their suitability beyond the current award.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar elevator maintenance services?

The awarded price of $531,700 for a one-year elevator maintenance contract for the 320 1st NW Building needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. Factors such as the number and type of elevators, service level agreements, and the specific maintenance tasks included would influence the comparison. While the firm fixed-price structure offers cost certainty, a detailed market analysis comparing per-elevator or per-service rates would be necessary to definitively assess value for money. The competitive nature of the award under SAP suggests a reasonable price was likely achieved.

What are the primary risks associated with this elevator maintenance contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential unforeseen major repairs that may exceed the scope of routine maintenance, potentially leading to additional costs or contract modifications. There is also a risk of service disruptions if the contractor fails to meet performance standards, impacting building operations. Dependence on a single contractor for a critical system like elevators introduces a risk if the contractor experiences financial instability or operational issues. Ensuring robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the current contract in ensuring the reliability of elevators at 320 1st NW?

The effectiveness of the current contract in ensuring elevator reliability hinges on the quality of service provided by Quality Elevator Co., LLC and the adequacy of the contract's performance standards. As this is a new contract for FY26, its effectiveness is yet to be determined. The firm fixed-price structure incentivizes the contractor to perform efficiently, but the ultimate measure of effectiveness will be the uptime and safety record of the elevators throughout the contract period. Regular inspections and performance monitoring by the government are essential to gauge and ensure this effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for elevator maintenance at this specific federal building?

Historical spending patterns for elevator maintenance at the 320 1st NW Building are not provided in the current data. To establish such patterns, one would need to review past contracts for elevator maintenance at this location, noting award amounts, contract durations, and any modifications or extensions. Analyzing this historical data would reveal trends in spending, identify potential cost increases over time, and provide context for the current contract's value. Understanding these patterns is crucial for long-term budget planning and identifying potential inefficiencies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15BNAS23Q00000055

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4808 UPSHUR ST, BLADENSBURG, MD, 20710

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $53,380

Exercised Options: $53,380

Current Obligation: $53,170

Actual Outlays: $11,186

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BNAS23D00000193

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline