DOJ contract for substance use and mental health services in Lubbock, TX, valued at $1.22M over 27 months

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $122,065 ($122.1K)

Contractor: Fondren, Gloria Dean

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 272 days

Daily Burn Rate: $449/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: SUBSTANCE USE, MENTAL HEALTH, MEDICATION ASSISTED , AND SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT SERVICES IN LUBBOCK, TX.

Place of Performance

Location: WINDCREST, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78239

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $122,065 to FONDREN, GLORIA DEAN for work described as: SUBSTANCE USE, MENTAL HEALTH, MEDICATION ASSISTED , AND SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT SERVICES IN LUBBOCK, TX. Key points: 1. Contract aims to provide essential treatment services for federal inmates. 2. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, indicating predictable costs. 3. Competition under SAP suggests a streamlined process, potentially impacting price discovery. 4. The duration of 27 months provides a stable service period. 5. Services are geographically focused on Lubbock, Texas, serving a specific inmate population. 6. The contractor, Gloria Dean Fondren, is responsible for delivering these critical health services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.22 million for 27 months of outpatient mental health and substance abuse services appears reasonable for a specialized federal correctional facility. Benchmarking against similar contracts for correctional healthcare is difficult without more specific service details and geographic comparisons. However, the firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. The absence of a specific per-unit cost makes a direct value-for-money assessment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a limited number of bidders compared to full and open competition. While SAP aims for efficiency, it may not always yield the most competitive pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to assess the extent of competition. This approach is often used for smaller dollar value procurements where full competition might be cost-prohibitive.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition under SAP may result in higher prices for taxpayers compared to a fully competed contract, as fewer vendors have the opportunity to bid and potentially offer lower rates.

Public Impact

Federal inmates in Lubbock, TX, will benefit from substance use, mental health, and medication-assisted treatment. The services delivered are outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment. The geographic impact is concentrated within the Lubbock, Texas area, specifically serving the Bureau of Prisons facilities. The contract supports the rehabilitation and well-being of the incarcerated population, potentially aiding in successful reintegration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition under SAP could lead to suboptimal pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing service quality difficult.
Geographic concentration limits potential for broader service delivery or economies of scale.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Focus on critical health services addresses inmate well-being.
Contract duration offers stability for service provision.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Healthcare sector, specifically focusing on outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment. The market for correctional healthcare services is specialized, often involving government contracts with healthcare providers. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more granular data on service scope and patient volume, but federal spending on inmate healthcare is substantial across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor is Gloria Dean Fondren.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) within the Department of Justice. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract awards databases, though detailed performance monitoring and Inspector General oversight specifics are not provided in this data.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Services
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Grants
Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price.
Contractor performance history not detailed.
Specific service metrics not provided.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $122,065 to FONDREN, GLORIA DEAN. SUBSTANCE USE, MENTAL HEALTH, MEDICATION ASSISTED , AND SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT SERVICES IN LUBBOCK, TX.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FONDREN, GLORIA DEAN.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $122,065.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Gloria Dean Fondren in providing similar healthcare services to federal correctional facilities?

Information regarding Gloria Dean Fondren's specific track record in providing substance use, mental health, and sex offender treatment services to federal correctional facilities is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history with the Bureau of Prisons or other federal agencies, and any reported issues or successes. Without this, it's difficult to gauge their experience and reliability for this specific contract.

How does the per-patient cost of these services compare to national benchmarks for correctional mental health treatment?

The provided data does not include a per-patient cost or the anticipated number of patients. Therefore, a direct comparison to national benchmarks for correctional mental health treatment is not possible. To perform such an analysis, one would need to know the total contract value, the contract duration, the estimated patient load, and the specific services provided per patient. Benchmarking would then involve comparing this calculated per-patient cost against data from similar facilities or national averages.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risk indicators for this contract could include potential service quality issues, contractor performance failures, or fluctuations in inmate population requiring the services. Given the limited competition under SAP, there's also a risk of suboptimal pricing. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust contract oversight by the Bureau of Prisons, clear performance standards, regular reporting requirements, and potentially contingency plans for service continuity. The firm-fixed-price nature helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government.

What is the historical spending pattern for substance use and mental health services within the Federal Prison System in the Lubbock, TX region?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns for substance use and mental health services within the Federal Prison System in Lubbock, TX. To analyze historical spending, one would need access to contract databases covering previous years, identifying all contracts for similar services in that geographic area or for that specific facility. This would allow for trend analysis, identification of spending increases or decreases, and understanding of long-term investment in these services.

What specific metrics are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the substance use and mental health treatment provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment services. Typically, such contracts would include requirements for tracking patient progress, treatment completion rates, recidivism rates post-release, and patient satisfaction. The Bureau of Prisons would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring the contractor meets the defined performance standards. A detailed review of the contract statement of work would be necessary to identify these specific evaluation criteria.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Outpatient Care Centers › Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8930 FOURWINDS DR STE 255, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78239

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $453,010

Exercised Options: $453,010

Current Obligation: $122,065

Actual Outlays: $61,583

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BCTS22D00000650

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline