DOJ's $34.6M contract for community treatment services in Miami awarded to Banyan Community Health Center Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,583 ($34.6K)

Contractor: Banyan Community Health Center Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,159 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN MIAMI, FL

Place of Performance

Location: DORAL, MIAMI-DADE County, FLORIDA, 33172

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $34,583.4 to BANYAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC for work described as: COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN MIAMI, FL Key points: 1. Contract awarded for outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers. 2. Service delivery spans over five years, from November 2020 to September 2026. 3. The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures). 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 5. The contractor, Banyan Community Health Center Inc., is based in Florida. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 621420.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $34.6 million over approximately five years for community treatment services in Miami appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers in major metropolitan areas would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure suggests cost predictability for the government, but it's important to ensure the scope of work adequately covers the required services to avoid potential change orders or performance issues.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically implies a less extensive competition than full and open competition. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP is generally used for acquisitions below certain dollar thresholds and may involve fewer offerors. This level of competition could potentially lead to less aggressive pricing compared to a broader solicitation, but it is often chosen for efficiency in acquiring goods and services that are readily available.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, competition under SAP may mean a slightly higher price than if a large-scale, open competition had been conducted, but it also allows for quicker procurement of necessary services.

Public Impact

Provides essential community treatment services, including mental health and substance abuse care, to individuals in Miami, Florida. Benefits individuals seeking rehabilitation and support for mental health and addiction challenges. Supports the local healthcare infrastructure in Miami-Dade County. May indirectly support the workforce by enabling individuals to maintain or regain employment through treatment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for limited competition under SAP may impact price discovery.
  • Ensuring the scope of work fully addresses evolving treatment needs is crucial for long-term effectiveness.
  • Reliance on a single provider for a significant duration requires robust performance monitoring.

Positive Signals

  • Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
  • Contract duration allows for sustained service delivery and relationship building.
  • Focus on community-based treatment aligns with modern healthcare approaches.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare sector, specifically outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers, is a critical component of public health infrastructure. This contract falls within the broader healthcare services industry, which is characterized by specialized providers and varying levels of government funding. Spending in this sector is often driven by public health needs, insurance coverage, and federal/state mandates. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per-patient costs or contract values for similar service providers in other urban areas.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans for this contract was not explicitly provided in the data. Given the nature of specialized healthcare services, it's possible that the primary contractor is a larger entity or a community health center with established operations. Further investigation would be needed to determine if any small business participation requirements were included or if subcontracting opportunities were made available to smaller entities within the healthcare ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would likely fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons, given the agency and service area. Accountability measures would typically involve performance reviews, adherence to service level agreements, and financial audits. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of ongoing oversight activities may not be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • Community Mental Health Services
  • Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
  • Federal Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Contracts
  • Outpatient Healthcare Services

Risk Flags

  • Potential for limited competition
  • Ensuring adequate scope definition for fixed-price contract
  • Contractor performance monitoring critical for service continuity

Tags

healthcare, mental-health, substance-abuse, community-services, department-of-justice, federal-prison-system, competed-under-sap, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, florida, miami, outpatient-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $34,583.4 to BANYAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC. COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN MIAMI, FL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BANYAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34,583.4.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Banyan Community Health Center Inc. in delivering similar community treatment services?

Banyan Community Health Center Inc. is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that has been providing comprehensive primary care, behavioral health, and dental services to underserved communities in South Florida since 1989. Their experience includes managing grants and contracts for various health and social services. While specific performance metrics for this particular DOJ contract are not publicly detailed, their long-standing operation and status as an FQHC suggest a capacity to deliver community-based health services. A deeper dive into their past performance reviews, client satisfaction data, and any previous government audits would offer a more complete picture of their track record in fulfilling contract obligations.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar community treatment services procured by other federal agencies or in comparable geographic locations?

Benchmarking the pricing of this $34.6 million contract for community treatment services requires comparing it against similar contracts for outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers in major metropolitan areas, particularly those serving populations with specific needs, such as those managed by the Federal Prison System. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns or a database of comparable contracts, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests that the government aimed for cost certainty. Factors like the specific scope of services, intensity of care, and local labor costs in Miami would influence the overall price. A comprehensive analysis would involve examining per-patient costs, service utilization rates, and administrative overhead compared to industry standards and other government procurements.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential underperformance by the contractor in delivering the required mental health and substance abuse services, leading to gaps in care for the intended beneficiaries. Another risk is scope creep or inadequate definition of services, which could lead to cost overruns or disputes, despite the firm fixed-price structure. Contractor capacity and staffing levels to meet demand are also critical. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the Department of Justice, clear service level agreements, regular reporting requirements, and established protocols for addressing deficiencies or performance issues. The long-term nature of the contract also necessitates ongoing assessment of the contractor's financial stability and operational effectiveness.

How effective is the Federal Prison System in managing contracts for community-based treatment services to ensure positive outcomes for beneficiaries?

The effectiveness of the Federal Prison System (FPS) in managing contracts for community-based treatment services is a complex issue with varying outcomes. FPS relies on community providers like Banyan Community Health Center to extend care beyond correctional facilities, particularly for re-entry programs and specialized treatment needs. Success is often measured by recidivism rates, successful reintegration into society, and improvements in beneficiaries' health and well-being. While contracts provide a framework for service delivery, the FPS's effectiveness hinges on diligent contract oversight, performance management, and ensuring that contracted services align with the specific needs of the inmate and re-entry population. Challenges can include ensuring continuity of care, managing diverse treatment needs, and verifying the quality of services provided by external entities.

What has been the historical spending pattern for community treatment services by the Department of Justice or the Federal Prison System?

Historical spending by the Department of Justice (DOJ), particularly the Federal Prison System (FPS), on community treatment services, including mental health and substance abuse programs, has generally trended upwards in recent years. This reflects a growing recognition of the importance of addressing these issues for inmate rehabilitation, successful re-entry, and reducing recidivism. Spending is allocated across various contract types, including direct service provision, program development, and support services. Specific figures for community treatment services can fluctuate based on policy priorities, inmate population needs, and the availability of qualified providers. Analyzing historical data from the FPS budget and contract databases would reveal trends in investment in these critical areas.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceOutpatient Care CentersOutpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICESSOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6100 BLUE LAGOON DR STE 400, MIAMI, FL, 33126

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,042,176

Exercised Options: $1,042,176

Current Obligation: $34,583

Actual Outlays: $9,429

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJBCTS483

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-11-01

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending