DOJ's $100K contract for Brooklyn Navy Yard electrical and water services awarded via sole-source procurement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $100,000 ($100.0K)

Contractor: Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-01-30

Contract Duration: 121 days

Daily Burn Rate: $826/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MDC BROOKLYN WAREHOUSE (BUILDING 4) - ELECTRICAL & WATER SERVICES FOR FY26 OCTOBER 1, 2025, THROUGH JANUARY 30, 2026.

Place of Performance

Location: BROOKLYN, KINGS County, NEW YORK, 11205

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $100,000 to BROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP for work described as: MDC BROOKLYN WAREHOUSE (BUILDING 4) - ELECTRICAL & WATER SERVICES FOR FY26 OCTOBER 1, 2025, THROUGH JANUARY 30, 2026. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential utility services at MDC Brooklyn Warehouse. 2. Short contract duration of 121 days for FY26. 3. Procurement method was 'not available for competition', indicating potential sole-source award. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a localized or specific need. 6. Awardee is Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp, potentially indicating a pre-existing relationship or unique capability.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $100,000 for a 121-day period for electrical and water services appears reasonable for a facility of this nature. However, without more detailed service requirements or comparable contract data for similar facilities, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability. Benchmarking against similar utility service contracts for federal facilities of comparable size and location would be necessary for a more robust evaluation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded under a 'not available for competition' basis, strongly suggesting a sole-source procurement. This implies that only one vendor, Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp, was considered capable of fulfilling the requirement. The lack of competition means there was no opportunity for price discovery through a bidding process, which could potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the benefit of competitive pricing, as the award was not subject to open bidding. This could result in a higher effective cost for these essential utility services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons, ensuring operational continuity at MDC Brooklyn. Essential electrical and water services will be maintained for Building 4 of the Brooklyn Navy Yard Warehouse. The geographic impact is localized to Brooklyn, New York. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving existing personnel from the awardee.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
The sole-source nature limits transparency and the ability to verify if the best possible price was obtained.
Short contract duration may indicate a temporary or stop-gap measure, raising questions about long-term utility planning.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the specified period.
Awardee is a known entity within the Brooklyn Navy Yard, potentially ensuring familiarity with the site's infrastructure.
Contract ensures essential services are maintained, preventing operational disruptions.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Utilities and Facility Support Services sector. The market for such services is generally stable, driven by the ongoing need for operational maintenance of government facilities. While the specific value is modest, it represents a typical expenditure for maintaining essential services at a federal site. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing utility contracts for other Bureau of Prisons facilities or similar government installations in urban areas.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved small business set-asides or subcontracting opportunities. The awardee, Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp, is likely a larger entity, and the nature of the services (utility provision) may not lend itself to extensive subcontracting, particularly under a sole-source award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's Bureau of Prisons contracting and financial management departments. Given the sole-source nature and relatively small value, formal oversight mechanisms might be less extensive than for larger, competed contracts. Transparency is limited due to the procurement method. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud or mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Operations
Bureau of Prisons Facility Management
Government Utility Contracts
Brooklyn Navy Yard Infrastructure

Risk Flags

Sole-source procurement limits competition and price discovery.
Lack of detailed service requirements hinders full value assessment.
Short contract duration may indicate a temporary solution or planning gap.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $100,000 to BROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP. MDC BROOKLYN WAREHOUSE (BUILDING 4) - ELECTRICAL & WATER SERVICES FOR FY26 OCTOBER 1, 2025, THROUGH JANUARY 30, 2026.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $100,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-01-30.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under 'not available for competition' (CT: 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'). This designation typically implies that only one responsible source exists to fulfill the requirement, or that a compelling justification, such as urgency, unique capability, or a critical need that cannot be met by other sources, was presented. For this specific contract, the awardee is Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp, suggesting they may possess unique access, control, or capability related to the electrical and water infrastructure within the Navy Yard itself, making them the only viable option. Further details on the justification would be found in the contract's Justification and Approval (J&A) document, which is not provided here.

How does the $100,000 contract value compare to similar utility service contracts for federal facilities?

A direct comparison of the $100,000 value for a 121-day period is difficult without more specific data points. However, for essential utility services like electricity and water at a federal facility, this amount appears to be on the lower end, suggesting either a limited scope of service, a partial facility requirement (Building 4 only), or a short operational period. Larger federal facilities often have multi-million dollar annual contracts for comprehensive utility management. The firm fixed-price nature helps control costs, but the lack of competition prevents a true market-based valuation. Benchmarking against similar-sized facilities or specific utility components (e.g., just electrical distribution) would provide better context.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for essential utility services?

The primary risk of a sole-source award for essential utility services is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. The government cannot be certain it is receiving the best possible value. Additionally, there's a risk of complacency from the awarded contractor, as they face no immediate threat from competitors. This could potentially impact service quality or responsiveness over time, although the short duration of this contract may mitigate some long-term risks. Transparency is also reduced, making it harder for oversight bodies and the public to scrutinize the procurement process and ensure accountability.

What is the track record of Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp in providing services to the federal government?

The provided data does not include specific details on the track record of Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp (BNYDDC) in providing services to the federal government. However, as the entity responsible for the development and management of the Brooklyn Navy Yard, BNYDDC likely has extensive experience managing the site's infrastructure, including utilities. Its role as the awardee suggests a familiarity and potentially a proprietary or exclusive capability related to the site's utility systems. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing BNYDDC's past performance records, contract history with federal agencies, and any available CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) data.

What are the implications of the short contract duration (121 days) for the Bureau of Prisons?

The short duration of 121 days (approximately four months) for electrical and water services suggests this contract may be a short-term solution or a bridge to a longer-term arrangement. It could be intended to cover a specific period within Fiscal Year 2026, perhaps pending the finalization of a larger, multi-year contract, or to address an immediate, time-bound need. For the Bureau of Prisons, this implies a need for continuity of essential services during this specific window. It also raises questions about the long-term strategy for utility provision at this facility and whether a more stable, longer-term contract is planned.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Utilities › Natural Gas Distribution › Natural Gas Distribution

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 63 FLUSHING AVE UNIT 300, BROOKLYN, NY, 11205

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $100,000

Exercised Options: $100,000

Current Obligation: $100,000

Actual Outlays: $34,060

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline