DOJ awards $2.98M firm-fixed-price contract for FCI Coleman roof replacement to Blasco Construction Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,977,958 ($3.0M)

Contractor: Blasco Construction Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-01-14

End Date: 2026-08-14

Contract Duration: 212 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 23Z3AT3 - FCC COLEMAN-REPLACE ROOF- FCI LOW UNICOR

Place of Performance

Location: MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE County, FLORIDA, 33142

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3.0 million to BLASCO CONSTRUCTION CORP for work described as: 23Z3AT3 - FCC COLEMAN-REPLACE ROOF- FCI LOW UNICOR Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating defined scope and cost. 2. Sole-source award suggests limited market availability or specific contractor qualifications. 3. Contract duration of 212 days for a critical infrastructure repair. 4. Performance period spans across two fiscal years, impacting budget allocation. 5. Geographic focus on Florida, potentially impacting regional construction markets. 6. No small business set-aside noted, raising questions about broader economic participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.98 million for a roof replacement at a federal facility appears within a reasonable range for such projects, though specific benchmarks are unavailable without more detailed project scope. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost certainty for the government. However, the lack of competitive bidding limits the ability to definitively assess value-for-money against market alternatives. Further analysis would require comparison with similar-sized roofing projects at other federal correctional institutions or comparable facilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not openly competed. This typically occurs when only one responsible source is available or when the agency determines that a sole-source award is in the government's best interest, often due to unique capabilities or urgent needs. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was not utilized, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple bids were solicited.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit opportunities for taxpayers to benefit from competitive pricing, as the government did not leverage multiple bids to secure the most cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the inmates and staff at FCI Coleman, Florida, who will receive improved facility infrastructure. The service delivered is the replacement of a critical roofing system, essential for maintaining the integrity and habitability of the facility. The geographic impact is localized to the FCI Coleman facility in Florida. Workforce implications include employment for construction workers and subcontractors managed by Blasco Construction Corp.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
Lack of small business set-aside may reduce opportunities for smaller firms in this contract.
Firm-fixed-price contract, while providing cost certainty, could lead to contractor windfalls if costs are lower than anticipated.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty for the government.
Award to a single contractor streamlines management and execution.
Focus on a critical infrastructure repair addresses a necessary facility need.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for government facilities, involves significant spending on infrastructure maintenance and repair. Roofing is a critical component of building envelopes, and its replacement is a substantial undertaking. Federal agencies like the Bureau of Prisons frequently contract for such services to ensure the safety and operational integrity of their facilities. Benchmarks for similar projects can vary widely based on facility size, complexity, and geographic location, but projects in the millions of dollars are common for major repairs.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Blasco Construction Corp., a single entity, suggests that opportunities for small businesses would primarily be through subcontracting if Blasco chooses to engage them. Without explicit set-aside provisions or reporting, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear and potentially limited.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) contracting officers and project managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring completion of specified work to the agreed-upon standard. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases like FPDS, where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Facility Maintenance
Bureau of Prisons Capital Improvements
Federal Building and Fire Safety Program
Construction Services for Government Facilities

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may indicate limited market competition.
Lack of small business participation noted.
Project duration spans fiscal year end, requiring careful budget management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3.0 million to BLASCO CONSTRUCTION CORP. 23Z3AT3 - FCC COLEMAN-REPLACE ROOF- FCI LOW UNICOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BLASCO CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-14. End: 2026-08-14.

What is the track record of Blasco Construction Corp. with federal contracts, particularly with the Bureau of Prisons?

A review of federal contract databases indicates that Blasco Construction Corp. has received federal contracts, though the extent of their work with the Bureau of Prisons specifically requires deeper investigation. Analyzing past performance on similar projects, including the timeliness of completion, adherence to budget, and quality of work, is crucial for assessing their capability to execute this roofing project successfully. Information on past disputes, contract modifications, or performance issues would provide further insight into their reliability as a contractor for critical infrastructure repairs.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar roofing projects in Florida?

Benchmarking the $2.98 million award against market rates for similar roofing projects in Florida is challenging without detailed project specifications. Factors such as the size of the roof, materials used, complexity of the structure, and prevailing labor costs in the specific region of Florida where FCI Coleman is located significantly influence pricing. A comprehensive comparison would involve analyzing recent bids for comparable federal or large commercial roofing projects in the same geographic area, considering the scope of work, warranty periods, and contractor overhead and profit margins.

What are the specific risks associated with a sole-source award for a critical infrastructure project like roof replacement?

The primary risk of a sole-source award is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without multiple bids, the government may not achieve the best possible price. Additionally, there's a risk that the selected contractor may not possess the most innovative or efficient methods, as competition often drives contractors to offer their best solutions. Ensuring the contractor has the necessary expertise and capacity is paramount, and the government must rely heavily on pre-award due diligence to mitigate these risks.

What is the historical spending pattern for roofing and facility maintenance at FCI Coleman?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for roofing and facility maintenance at FCI Coleman would provide context for the current $2.98 million award. Understanding how frequently major roofing projects have been undertaken, the costs associated with previous repairs or replacements, and the types of contracts used (competitive vs. sole-source) can reveal trends in maintenance needs and spending efficiency. Significant deviations from historical spending could indicate changing facility conditions, increased maintenance requirements, or potentially less favorable contract terms.

What are the potential implications of the firm-fixed-price contract type on project quality and cost overruns?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract is designed to provide cost certainty for the government, shifting most of the cost risk to the contractor. For a project like roof replacement, this means the contractor is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of unforeseen cost increases. This can incentivize efficiency and cost control by the contractor. However, if the scope of work is not precisely defined, or if unforeseen conditions arise that significantly impact the contractor's costs, it could lead to disputes or pressure to cut corners on quality to maintain profitability, although the FFP structure aims to prevent this.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors › Roofing Contractors

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4265 NW 37TH AVE, MIAMI, FL, 33142

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,977,958

Exercised Options: $2,977,958

Current Obligation: $2,977,958

Actual Outlays: $937,784

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline