DOJ's $136K milk contract for FCI Seagoville awarded to Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $136,037 ($136.0K)

Contractor: Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 272 days

Daily Burn Rate: $500/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY2026 WEEKLY MILK DELIVERY FOR THE POPULATION OF FCI SEAGOVILLE. QUARTER 1 - OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2025

Place of Performance

Location: GARLAND, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75041

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $136,036.5 to BROTHERS PRODUCE OF DALLAS, INC. for work described as: FY2026 WEEKLY MILK DELIVERY FOR THE POPULATION OF FCI SEAGOVILLE. QUARTER 1 - OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2025 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the firm fixed-price structure and duration. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive award, though specific details are limited. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a clear scope and established contractor. 4. Performance context is a routine supply contract for a federal facility. 5. Sector positioning is within the food manufacturing and distribution services for government facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of approximately $136,000 for nearly nine months of milk delivery seems aligned with market rates for institutional supply. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar federal prison system food supply contracts would offer further insight, but the price appears competitive for the quantity and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was competed under SAP (Small Acquisition Program), suggesting it was likely a competitive process among pre-qualified vendors or through simplified acquisition procedures. The number of bidders is not specified, but SAP typically aims for fair competition within its streamlined framework. The level of competition influences price discovery and ensures the government receives a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP suggests an effort to obtain competitive pricing efficiently for a relatively small dollar value, benefiting taxpayers through cost-effective procurement.

Public Impact

Inmates and staff at FCI Seagoville will benefit from a consistent supply of milk. Essential nutritional needs are met through this food service contract. The geographic impact is localized to Seagoville, Texas. The contract supports local jobs indirectly through the food supply chain.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions impacting delivery schedules.
Reliance on a single contractor could lead to price increases in future solicitations if competition diminishes.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides budget predictability.
Contract duration of over 270 days ensures continuity of service.
Award to a specific company suggests a known entity capable of meeting requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader food services and distribution sector, specifically serving government institutions. The market for supplying federal facilities is often characterized by specialized logistics and compliance requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other food supply contracts for correctional facilities or similar government installations, which can vary significantly based on location and inmate population.

Small Business Impact

The contract was competed under SAP, which may include provisions for small business participation. However, without specific details on set-asides or subcontracting plans, the direct impact on small businesses is unclear. If Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc. is a small business, it directly benefits; otherwise, subcontracting opportunities would be key to assessing broader small business ecosystem impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) contracting officer's representative (COR) at FCI Seagoville, ensuring timely delivery and adherence to specifications. Accountability is maintained through the purchase order terms and conditions. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, though detailed performance metrics are not always publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Food Services
Bureau of Prisons Supply Contracts
Institutional Food Procurement
Department of Justice Supply Chain Management

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruption
Limited visibility into specific competition details

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $136,036.5 to BROTHERS PRODUCE OF DALLAS, INC.. FY2026 WEEKLY MILK DELIVERY FOR THE POPULATION OF FCI SEAGOVILLE. QUARTER 1 - OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2025

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BROTHERS PRODUCE OF DALLAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $136,036.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc. with federal contracts?

Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily with agencies like the Department of Justice and the Department of Defense. Analysis of their past performance indicates a consistent ability to fulfill food supply requirements. While specific contract values and durations vary, their engagement in multiple federal solicitations suggests a capacity to meet government standards. Further review of past performance evaluations and any reported disputes or contract terminations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and adherence to contractual obligations.

How does the price of this milk contract compare to similar federal procurements?

Benchmarking the price of this $136,000 contract for weekly milk delivery requires comparison with similar contracts for federal correctional facilities or other large institutions. Factors such as volume, delivery frequency, specific milk types (e.g., whole, skim, organic), and geographic location significantly influence pricing. Without access to detailed historical data for comparable contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests a negotiated rate intended to be competitive at the time of award. A detailed analysis would involve comparing the per-gallon or per-unit cost against other contracts of similar scope and duration within the Bureau of Prisons or other federal agencies.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are related to supply chain reliability and potential price volatility in future solicitations. Disruptions in the supply chain, whether due to weather, transportation issues, or producer shortages, could impact the consistent delivery of milk to FCI Seagoville. Additionally, if Brothers Produce of Dallas, Inc. faces increased operational costs, these could be reflected in higher bids for future contract renewals, especially if competition is limited. The firm fixed-price structure mitigates immediate price risk for the government during the current contract period. Ensuring robust quality control and timely delivery mechanisms are key to managing operational risks.

How effective is the Bureau of Prisons in managing its food supply contracts?

The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) manages a vast network of facilities, each with complex supply chain needs, including food services. Their effectiveness in managing food supply contracts is generally considered adequate, though subject to the same challenges faced by large organizations, such as budget constraints and logistical complexities. The BOP utilizes various procurement methods, including competitive bidding and simplified acquisition procedures, to secure necessary goods and services. Performance is monitored through contracting officers' representatives and contract performance reports. While specific data on contract success rates or cost savings across all food contracts is not readily available, the continuous operation of facilities indicates a functional, albeit sometimes strained, management system. Inspector General reports occasionally highlight areas for improvement in procurement and supply chain management.

What are the historical spending patterns for milk delivery to FCI Seagoville?

Historical spending patterns for milk delivery to FCI Seagoville would reveal the consistency of this requirement and the typical contract values over time. Analyzing past contracts for this specific facility would indicate whether spending has remained relatively stable, increased, or decreased. It would also highlight the incumbent contractors and the competitiveness of previous awards. For instance, if spending has consistently been around the $136,000 mark annually or per contract period, it suggests a stable demand and pricing environment. Conversely, significant fluctuations might point to changes in inmate population, contract scope, or market conditions. Accessing historical contract data from federal procurement databases is essential for this analysis.

What is the typical duration and value of similar milk supply contracts for federal prisons?

The typical duration and value of milk supply contracts for federal prisons can vary significantly based on the size of the facility, inmate population, and regional market conditions. Contracts often range from one to five years, with values potentially reaching several hundred thousand dollars annually for larger institutions. This contract for FCI Seagoville, valued at approximately $136,000 over a 272-day period (roughly 9 months), appears to be on the smaller to mid-range side, consistent with a facility of moderate size. Firm fixed-price agreements are common to ensure cost predictability. Comparisons with other BOP facilities would provide a clearer picture of whether this contract's terms are standard or exceptional.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Food Manufacturing › All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15B51426Q00000002

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2600 MCCREE RD, GARLAND, TX, 75041

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $136,037

Exercised Options: $136,037

Current Obligation: $136,037

Actual Outlays: $60,714

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline