DOJ's $663K purchase order for dry goods to JNS FOODS LLC awarded under SAP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $66,300 ($66.3K)

Contractor: JNS Foods LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-05-01

End Date: 2026-05-01

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 18

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY 2026 Q3 - DRY GOODS

Place of Performance

Location: CORAL SPRINGS, BROWARD County, FLORIDA, 33071

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $66,300 to JNS FOODS LLC for work described as: FY 2026 Q3 - DRY GOODS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for dry goods, a recurring need for correctional facilities. 2. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a routine procurement. 3. Awarded to JNS FOODS LLC, a new entity with no prior federal contract history. 4. The contract is a firm-fixed-price purchase order, providing cost certainty. 5. Procurement was conducted under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a focus on efficiency for smaller dollar amounts. 6. The contract duration is a single day, suggesting an immediate or short-term need. 7. Geographic location of the award is Florida.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $663,000 for dry goods is substantial for a single day's delivery, raising questions about the quantity or nature of the goods. Without historical data or a clear breakdown of items, it's difficult to benchmark the value effectively. The award to a new vendor, JNS FOODS LLC, with no apparent track record, adds a layer of uncertainty regarding their capacity and pricing competitiveness. Comparing this to similar procurements for correctional facility supplies would be necessary for a more robust value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically allows for more streamlined competition for purchases under the simplified acquisition threshold. However, the specific competition details, such as the number of solicitations issued or bids received, are not provided. SAP can involve various methods, including GSA schedules, government-wide acquisition contracts, or direct solicitations. The limited information makes it impossible to assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP suggests an effort to expedite procurement for this relatively modest sum. However, without transparency on the competitive process, taxpayers cannot be assured that the best possible price was secured.

Public Impact

The Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons benefits from this contract by securing necessary dry goods for its operations. This contract ensures the provision of essential food supplies to inmates within the federal correctional system. The geographic impact is localized to Florida, where the vendor is based and presumably where the goods will be delivered or sourced. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving existing staff at JNS FOODS LLC for fulfillment and delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of vendor track record: JNS FOODS LLC is a new entity with no prior federal contracting history, making it difficult to assess performance reliability and past pricing.
Unclear quantity/scope: The contract value for a single day's delivery of dry goods is high, suggesting a potential for overpricing or an unusually large order that needs further clarification.
Limited competition visibility: While competed under SAP, the specific details of the competition are not disclosed, hindering an assessment of price reasonableness.
Potential for single-source award: The lack of detail on competition could mask a de facto sole-source award, which often leads to higher prices.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price award: This contract type provides cost certainty for the government, protecting against cost overruns.
Simplified Acquisition Procedures: The use of SAP indicates an effort to streamline the procurement process for efficiency.
Award to a Florida-based vendor: Supports local economies within the state.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of dry goods falls under the broader category of food manufacturing and distribution, a sector critical for supporting institutional needs like those of the Federal Prison System. This contract represents a small portion of the overall federal spending on food supplies, which is a continuous requirement for various government agencies. The market for food distribution is generally competitive, with numerous established suppliers. However, for specific niche requirements or simplified acquisitions, the landscape can vary.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor is there information about subcontracting plans. The award to JNS FOODS LLC, a new entity, does not provide enough data to assess its small business status or its potential impact on the broader small business ecosystem. Further investigation into the vendor's size and any subcontracting activities would be needed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System. As a purchase order awarded under SAP, it is expected to adhere to standard procurement regulations and internal controls. Transparency is limited by the lack of detailed competition information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Food Services
Bureau of Prisons Commissary Operations
Department of Justice General Services

Risk Flags

Lack of vendor past performance data
Unclear scope of goods and quantities
Potential for non-competitive award despite 'competed' status
High value for single-day delivery

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $66,300 to JNS FOODS LLC. FY 2026 Q3 - DRY GOODS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JNS FOODS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $66,300.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-01. End: 2026-05-01.

What is the specific nature and quantity of 'dry goods' being procured for $663,000 in a single day?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature or quantity of 'dry goods' included in this $663,000 purchase order. The term 'dry goods' is broad and can encompass a wide range of non-perishable food items, such as grains, pasta, canned goods, and baking supplies. The high value for a single-day delivery suggests either an exceptionally large order to stock a facility for an extended period, or potentially a misunderstanding of the delivery timeline versus the contract period. Without a detailed line-item breakdown or further clarification from the Department of Justice, it is impossible to ascertain the precise goods and their quantities. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to perform a meaningful cost analysis or benchmark against similar procurements.

What is the track record and capacity of JNS FOODS LLC for fulfilling this contract?

JNS FOODS LLC is identified as the contractor, but the provided data indicates no prior federal contract history for this entity. This lack of a federal track record means there is no established performance data, past performance evaluations, or documented experience with government procurements. Consequently, assessing their capacity to reliably fulfill a $663,000 order for dry goods within the specified timeframe is difficult. Government agencies typically rely on past performance as a key factor in award decisions, especially for significant dollar amounts. The award to a vendor with no federal history raises questions about the vetting process and potential risks associated with performance, delivery, and quality assurance.

How does the $663,000 value for a single-day delivery of dry goods compare to market rates and similar federal procurements?

Benchmarking the $663,000 value for a single-day delivery of dry goods is challenging without specific itemization. However, as a general comparison, this amount is exceptionally high for a single day's supply of typical dry goods for a correctional facility. For context, large-scale food service distributors often operate on much longer fulfillment cycles or have contracts structured differently. If this represents a bulk purchase for stocking purposes, the value might be more justifiable, but the 'single-day' delivery aspect is unusual. Federal procurements for food supplies are common, but the unit cost and volume are critical for comparison. Without knowing the exact items and quantities, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents good or poor value for money. Further analysis would require detailed product lists and quantities.

What specific Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) were used to compete this contract, and what does this imply about the competition level?

The data states the contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures). SAP is a set of regulations designed to streamline the procurement process for purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, though specific agency thresholds can vary, and this contract value exceeds that). However, the data does not specify which method within SAP was used (e.g., GSA Advantage, FedBizOpps, agency-specific portals, or informal solicitations). The term 'competed' implies that multiple offers were solicited, but the level of competition (number of bidders, quality of bids) is not detailed. For procurements above the standard SAP threshold, more formal competitive processes are usually expected. The use of SAP for a $663,000 contract might indicate a specific agency policy or a misunderstanding of the threshold, or it could be a contract vehicle that allows for SAP-like procedures up to a higher limit. The lack of detail hinders a thorough assessment of price discovery and taxpayer value.

What is the historical spending pattern for dry goods by the Federal Prison System/Bureau of Prisons?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for dry goods by the Federal Prison System or the Bureau of Prisons. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze past contracts for similar goods over several fiscal years. Key metrics to examine would include the total annual expenditure on dry goods, the average contract value, the number of vendors utilized, the typical contract duration, and the average price per unit for common items. Understanding historical spending would allow for a more informed assessment of whether the current $663,000 purchase order is an anomaly, a consistent expenditure, or indicative of a price increase. Without this context, it's difficult to determine if this specific contract represents a deviation from normal operational costs or pricing trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Food Manufacturing › All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15B50226Q00000038

Offers Received: 18

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1401 N UNIVERSITY DR, CORAL SPRINGS, FL, 33071

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $66,300

Exercised Options: $66,300

Current Obligation: $66,300

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline