DOJ awards $3.3M radiology services contract to BCT Partners LLC, a firm fixed-price delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,297 ($3.3K)

Contractor: BCT Partners LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 88 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: FY26 B1 BCT PARTNER RADIOLOGY SERVICES QTR 3 TOWO: 15BNAS21D00000087 NITAAC: HHSN316201200074W

Place of Performance

Location: NEWARK, ESSEX County, NEW JERSEY, 07103

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3,297.28 to BCT PARTNERS LLC for work described as: FY26 B1 BCT PARTNER RADIOLOGY SERVICES QTR 3 TOWO: 15BNAS21D00000087 NITAAC: HHSN316201200074W Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.3M for a short duration suggests a focused scope of services. 2. The contract was competed under SAP, indicating a potentially streamlined procurement process. 3. Fixed-price contract type generally transfers risk to the contractor, potentially stabilizing costs. 4. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The specific service category (Computer Systems Design Services) seems unusual for radiology services, warranting further investigation. 6. Contractor BCT Partners LLC's primary NAICS code is 541512, which is Computer Systems Design Services, not typically associated with medical services.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $3.3 million for a duration of approximately two months (April 3, 2026, to June 30, 2026) appears high for a single quarter of radiology services. Without specific details on the volume of services or the exact nature of the 'radiology services' being procured under a 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code, it is difficult to benchmark effectively. However, the apparent mismatch in service description and NAICS code raises concerns about the appropriateness of the pricing and the overall value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically implies a less extensive competition than full and open competition. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP is often used for procurements under a certain dollar threshold, suggesting that the competition may have been limited to a smaller pool of pre-qualified vendors or those responding to a specific solicitation. This could potentially lead to less aggressive pricing compared to a broader competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition under SAP may result in higher prices for taxpayers as the government might not receive the most cost-effective offers available in the broader market.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely inmates within the Federal Prison System, who will receive radiology services. The services delivered are radiology-related, though the exact scope is unclear given the NAICS code. The geographic impact is focused on New Jersey, where the contract is being performed. There are potential workforce implications for medical professionals providing these radiology services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The procurement of radiology services falls within the broader healthcare sector, specifically medical support services. However, the classification under NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services) is highly unusual and suggests this contract might be for IT-related aspects of radiology, such as PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) implementation or data management, rather than direct clinical interpretation of images. Comparable spending benchmarks for direct radiology services are difficult to establish without clarity on the service type. IT services for healthcare systems can vary widely in cost depending on complexity and scope.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, BCT Partners LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons. As a delivery order under an IDIQ, oversight might also be influenced by the parent contract's structure. Transparency is moderate, with basic award details available. Accountability rests with BCT Partners LLC to deliver the specified services. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-justice, federal-prison-system, bureau-of-prisons, competed-under-sap, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, computer-systems-design-services, new-jersey, healthcare-it, radiology-it, short-duration-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3,297.28 to BCT PARTNERS LLC. FY26 B1 BCT PARTNER RADIOLOGY SERVICES QTR 3 TOWO: 15BNAS21D00000087 NITAAC: HHSN316201200074W

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BCT PARTNERS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,297.28.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the specific nature of the 'radiology services' being procured under the NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services)?

The discrepancy between the stated service ('radiology services') and the assigned NAICS code (541512 - Computer Systems Design Services) is a significant point of concern. It is highly probable that this contract is not for the direct clinical interpretation of radiological images but rather for IT-related support for radiology operations. This could include the design, development, implementation, or maintenance of radiology information systems (RIS), picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), data analytics platforms for radiology, or other IT infrastructure supporting these functions. Without further clarification from the contracting agency (Department of Justice, Federal Prison System), it is impossible to definitively state the exact services. However, the NAICS code strongly suggests an IT focus rather than a direct healthcare provision.

How does the contract value of $3.3 million for approximately two months compare to market rates for similar IT services supporting radiology departments?

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the unusual combination of 'radiology services' and the 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code. If the contract is indeed for IT services related to radiology systems, $3.3 million for an 88-day period (roughly $37,500 per day) could be within a reasonable range for complex system design, integration, or significant IT support, especially if it involves specialized expertise or critical infrastructure for the Federal Prison System. However, without knowing the specific deliverables, the number of personnel involved, the complexity of the systems being designed or maintained, and the specific technologies utilized, a precise comparison to market rates is not feasible. The short duration suggests a project-based or intensive support engagement rather than ongoing operational IT services.

What are the potential risks associated with procuring radiology services under a Computer Systems Design Services NAICS code?

The primary risk is a fundamental misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the services being procured, leading to potential waste, fraud, or abuse. If the intent was for clinical radiology services, the contractor may lack the necessary medical licenses, certifications, and qualified personnel, posing a risk to patient care (inmate health). If the intent was for IT services, the description 'radiology services' is misleading and could obscure the true nature of the work, potentially hindering effective oversight and performance evaluation. There's also a risk that the government may not receive the specialized IT expertise required for complex radiology systems if the contractor's primary focus is broader computer systems design without specific healthcare IT domain knowledge. This could lead to suboptimal system performance, security vulnerabilities, or integration issues.

What is BCT Partners LLC's track record in providing IT services, particularly within the healthcare or federal prison system context?

Information regarding BCT Partners LLC's specific track record in providing IT services, especially within the healthcare sector or the federal prison system, is not detailed in the provided data snippet. Their primary NAICS code (541512) indicates a focus on Computer Systems Design Services. To assess their track record thoroughly, one would need to examine their past performance on similar federal contracts, including client satisfaction, project completion success rates, and any history of performance issues or contract disputes. Research into their portfolio and past performance evaluations would be crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities relevant to this specific contract's likely IT-focused nature.

Given the short duration (88 days) and the contract value, what level of performance is expected from BCT Partners LLC?

The short duration of 88 days suggests that BCT Partners LLC is expected to deliver specific, time-bound tasks or provide intensive support related to computer systems design for radiology services. This could involve a particular phase of a larger IT project, a system upgrade, a specialized analysis, or the implementation of a defined component. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is expected to complete the defined scope of work within the budget and timeframe, bearing the risk of cost overruns. The performance expectations would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), outlining specific deliverables, quality standards, and timelines that must be met for successful contract completion.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&DSPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15BNAS21Q00000007

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 105 LOCK ST STE 311, NEWARK, NJ, 07103

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,297

Exercised Options: $3,297

Current Obligation: $3,297

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BNAS21D00000087

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-03

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from BCT Partners LLC

View all BCT Partners LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending