DOJ's $20.9M contract for Pyxis medication cabinets awarded to Four Points Technology, emphasizing automated dispensing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,927 ($20.9K)

Contractor: Four Points Technology, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-04-02

Contract Duration: 183 days

Daily Burn Rate: $114/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: PYXIS AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING CABINETS FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY -CONTRACT#15BPCC25D00000025

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20171

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $20,926.68 to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C. for work described as: PYXIS AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING CABINETS FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY -CONTRACT#15BPCC25D00000025 Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through competitive bidding and fixed-price structure. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a robust process, potentially driving favorable pricing. 3. Risk indicators appear low given the established nature of the product and supplier. 4. Performance context is within the Bureau of Prisons' need for secure medication management. 5. Sector positioning is within medical instrument manufacturing, supporting healthcare operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20.9 million for Pyxis automated medication dispensing cabinets appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the equipment and its critical role in correctional facilities. Benchmarking against similar contracts for automated dispensing systems in healthcare or corrections would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting that while the initial solicitation may have had specific exclusions, the final award was made through a competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature implies multiple interested parties had the opportunity to compete, which generally supports price discovery and market-based pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a market where contractors offer their best prices to win the business.

Public Impact

Inmates in federal prisons will benefit from improved medication management and dispensing accuracy. The contract delivers essential medical equipment to support healthcare services within the Bureau of Prisons. Geographic impact will be nationwide, covering facilities managed by the Federal Prison System. Workforce implications include the need for trained personnel to operate and maintain the dispensing systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the medical device manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on automated dispensing systems. This market is characterized by technological innovation aimed at improving patient safety, efficiency, and compliance in healthcare settings. Spending in this area is driven by the need for advanced solutions in hospitals, pharmacies, and correctional facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing procurements of similar automated dispensing units by other federal agencies or large healthcare networks.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and the contract is not a small business set-aside. This suggests that the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. However, the prime contractor, Four Points Technology, LLC, may have its own subcontracting plans that could involve small businesses to fulfill parts of this large contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Bureau of Prisons contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified goods. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, medical-equipment, automated-dispensing, department-of-justice, bureau-of-prisons, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, federal-prison-system, virginia, correctional-facility, medication-management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $20,926.68 to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.. PYXIS AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING CABINETS FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY -CONTRACT#15BPCC25D00000025

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20,926.68.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-04-02.

What is the track record of Four Points Technology, L.L.C. in supplying similar automated medication dispensing systems to federal agencies?

Four Points Technology, L.L.C. has a history of providing various technology solutions and equipment to federal agencies. While specific details on their track record with Pyxis automated medication dispensing cabinets across multiple federal contracts are not immediately available from this data alone, their presence as a supplier suggests prior experience. Further investigation into their contract history, particularly with the Department of Justice or Bureau of Prisons, would reveal the extent and success of their past performance in delivering similar systems. Analyzing past performance evaluations and any reported issues would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in this specific product category.

How does the per-unit cost of these Pyxis cabinets compare to market rates or similar government contracts?

The provided data does not include the per-unit cost, making a direct comparison to market rates or similar government contracts impossible without further information. The total contract value of $20.9 million for an 18-month period (delivery order duration) for Pyxis automated medication dispensing cabinets suggests a significant investment. To assess value for money, one would need to know the number of units procured under this contract and their specific configurations. Benchmarking against publicly available pricing for Pyxis systems or similar automated dispensing solutions from other manufacturers, as well as analyzing historical contract awards for comparable items by agencies like the Department of Veterans Affairs or Department of Defense, would be necessary for a thorough cost analysis.

What are the primary risks associated with the implementation and long-term use of these automated medication dispensing systems within federal prisons?

Key risks include potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities, as these systems handle sensitive patient data and control medication access. System malfunctions or downtime could disrupt critical healthcare operations and potentially impact patient care. Another risk is the reliance on a specific vendor's proprietary system (Pyxis), which could lead to vendor lock-in, making future transitions or upgrades costly and complex. Ensuring adequate training for correctional healthcare staff to operate and maintain the systems effectively is also crucial; insufficient training can lead to errors or underutilization. Finally, the physical security of the cabinets themselves against tampering or unauthorized access within a correctional environment is a constant consideration.

How effective are automated medication dispensing systems like Pyxis in improving medication accuracy and patient safety in correctional settings compared to traditional methods?

Automated medication dispensing systems (AMDS) like Pyxis are generally considered highly effective in improving medication accuracy and patient safety, even in challenging environments like correctional facilities. Studies in various healthcare settings, including some correctional contexts, have shown that AMDS significantly reduce medication administration errors compared to manual methods. They provide a secure, controlled environment for storing and dispensing medications, often incorporating barcode scanning and patient identification to ensure the 'five rights' of medication administration (right patient, right drug, right time, right dose, right route). This enhanced accuracy and security are particularly valuable in prisons where diversion and errors can have severe consequences.

What has been the historical spending trend for automated medication dispensing systems by the Bureau of Prisons or the Department of Justice over the past five years?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for automated medication dispensing systems by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Department of Justice (DOJ) over the past five years would require accessing detailed federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending). This specific contract award of $20.9 million represents a significant single investment. Without access to historical data, it's difficult to ascertain if this represents an increase, decrease, or steady spending pattern. However, the ongoing need for secure and efficient medication management in correctional facilities suggests a consistent requirement for such systems, potentially leading to recurring procurements or upgrades over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingMedical Equipment and Supplies ManufacturingSurgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL/DENTAL/VETERINARY EQPT/SUPP

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 15BPCC25Q00000025

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13221 WOODLAND PARK RD, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,927

Exercised Options: $20,927

Current Obligation: $20,927

Actual Outlays: $10,463

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BPCC25D00000025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-10-01

Current End Date: 2026-04-02

Potential End Date: 2026-04-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from Four Points Technology, L.L.C.

View all Four Points Technology, L.L.C. federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending