DOJ awards $3.7M for electric power distribution to Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Florida

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,712,496 ($3.7M)

Contractor: Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 334 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FCC COLEMAN ELECTRIC UTILITY FY26 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000096

Place of Performance

Location: SUMTERVILLE, SUMTER County, FLORIDA, 33585

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3.7 million to SUMTER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. for work described as: FCC COLEMAN ELECTRIC UTILITY FY26 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000096 Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.7M for electric power distribution services. 2. Awarded to Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. for a period of 334 days. 3. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type, indicating predictable costs. 4. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The contract is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. Geographic focus is Florida, specifically Sumter County. 7. No small business set-aside was utilized for this award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3.7 million for electric power distribution over 334 days appears reasonable given the scope of services for a federal facility. Benchmarking against similar utility contracts is challenging without more specific service details, but the firm fixed price structure suggests cost certainty for the government. The award amount is within the expected range for such services in the specified region.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment. This approach is generally expected to yield fair market pricing and encourage efficient service delivery.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition provides taxpayers with assurance that the government sought the best value by allowing multiple vendors to compete, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality.

Public Impact

The Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons benefits from reliable electric power distribution. Essential services for the operational continuity of a federal correctional facility are ensured. The geographic impact is localized to Sumter County, Florida. The contract supports the infrastructure necessary for the facility's operations and staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
Limited insight into the number of bidders and their qualifications.
Potential for price fluctuations if the contract scope expands beyond initial estimates.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market was leveraged.
Awarded to an established cooperative, potentially indicating reliability.

Sector Analysis

The electric power distribution sector is critical for maintaining essential services across all government agencies. This contract falls within the utility services sub-sector, which is characterized by regulated pricing and established providers. The market size for utility services to federal facilities is substantial, with spending often dictated by the operational needs and geographic locations of installations. This specific award represents a small portion of the overall federal spending on utilities.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc., a cooperative, suggests a focus on established utility providers rather than a direct impact on the small business contracting ecosystem for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the Federal Prison System's procurement and facilities management departments. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver services at the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Utilities Contracts
Department of Justice Energy Procurement
Florida Utility Services Contracts
Electric Power Distribution Services

Risk Flags

Limited bidder information provided.
No specific performance metrics detailed.
Potential for unforeseen infrastructure issues impacting service.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3.7 million to SUMTER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.. FCC COLEMAN ELECTRIC UTILITY FY26 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000096

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUMTER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for electric power distribution at this specific federal facility?

Analyzing historical spending for electric power distribution at this specific federal facility requires access to past contract data for the Bureau of Prisons in Sumter County, Florida. Without direct access to this historical data, it's difficult to provide a precise pattern. However, federal facilities typically have ongoing needs for utility services, suggesting a recurring expenditure. The current award of approximately $3.7 million for a 334-day period (roughly $11,100 per day) can serve as a benchmark. If previous contracts were for similar durations and service levels, spending would likely be in a comparable range annually. Variations could arise from changes in energy prices, facility expansion or contraction, or shifts in the competitive landscape affecting pricing. Further investigation into prior awards for this location would be necessary to establish a definitive historical trend.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar electric power distribution services in Florida?

Comparing the awarded price of approximately $3.7 million for 334 days of electric power distribution services to market rates in Florida requires detailed knowledge of utility pricing structures, which can vary significantly by region and provider. Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. is a member-owned cooperative, and its pricing may differ from investor-owned utilities. The daily rate is roughly $11,100. Factors influencing market rates include the specific voltage levels, peak demand requirements, infrastructure maintenance responsibilities, and regulatory frameworks. Without a detailed breakdown of the services rendered and the specific service territory's rate structure, a precise market comparison is challenging. However, the 'full and open competition' suggests the government aimed to secure a competitive rate. Further analysis would involve examining publicly available rate schedules for similar cooperatives or utilities serving comparable industrial or institutional loads in the region.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being monitored?

The provided data does not explicitly list the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this electric power distribution contract. Typically, for utility services, KPIs would focus on reliability (e.g., uptime percentage, frequency of outages), response times to service calls or emergencies, adherence to safety standards, and potentially energy efficiency metrics. Monitoring of performance would likely be conducted by the contracting officer's representative (COR) or a designated technical point of contact within the Federal Prison System. This monitoring would involve reviewing service logs, outage reports, and potentially conducting site inspections to ensure the contractor is meeting the terms and conditions of the contract, including the delivery of power within specified parameters and timely resolution of any issues.

What is the contractor's track record with the federal government, particularly for similar services?

Information regarding Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc.'s specific track record with the federal government for electric power distribution services is not detailed in the provided data. As a cooperative, its primary focus may be on serving its member base. To assess its track record, one would typically look at past federal contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A review of federal procurement databases could reveal previous awards to this entity for similar services, providing insight into their experience and performance history with government clients. Without this specific data, it's assumed the award was made based on the contractor meeting the qualifications and competitive requirements outlined in the solicitation.

Are there any potential risks associated with this contract, such as contractor performance or financial stability?

Potential risks associated with this contract include standard operational risks inherent in utility services, such as unexpected equipment failures, severe weather events impacting distribution, or fluctuations in energy supply costs that could strain a fixed-price contract if not adequately managed. Contractor performance risk is always present, though the 'full and open competition' and the nature of utility provision by a cooperative may mitigate this. Financial stability of Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. would be a factor assessed during the procurement process, though not detailed here. The firm fixed price structure helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government, but it places the risk of cost increases on the contractor. The relatively short duration (334 days) also limits the long-term exposure to performance or financial risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Utilities › Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution › Electric Power Distribution

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 330 S US HWY 301, SUMTERVILLE, FL, 33585

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,712,496

Exercised Options: $3,712,496

Current Obligation: $3,712,496

Actual Outlays: $1,047,342

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15B30218D00000096

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline