DOJ awards $5.4M for water systems to City of Wildwood, highlighting infrastructure needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,398,875 ($5.4M)

Contractor: City of Wildwood City Hall

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FCC COLEMAN WATER AND WASTEWATER FY26 10/01/2025 - 01/30/2026 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000093

Place of Performance

Location: WILDWOOD, SUMTER County, FLORIDA, 34785

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $5.4 million to CITY OF WILDWOOD CITY HALL for work described as: FCC COLEMAN WATER AND WASTEWATER FY26 10/01/2025 - 01/30/2026 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000093 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a 364-day service period, but detailed cost breakdown is needed for full assessment. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and a single delivery order. 4. Performance context is limited to a single delivery order, making long-term performance assessment difficult. 5. Sector positioning is within essential public services, specifically water supply and irrigation systems. 6. The contract addresses critical infrastructure maintenance, a common area for federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $5.4 million for a one-year period for water supply and irrigation systems appears within a reasonable range for municipal services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for water system maintenance and operation by federal agencies or large municipalities would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which should theoretically lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are inmates and staff within the Federal Prison System, who will receive reliable water services. The services delivered include the operation and maintenance of water supply and irrigation systems. The geographic impact is localized to the facilities served by the City of Wildwood's water infrastructure. Workforce implications are primarily related to the operational staff of the City of Wildwood's water department.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics for this specific delivery order.
Limited visibility into the operational efficiency of the water systems beyond the contract scope.
Potential for scope creep if unforeseen issues arise with the water infrastructure.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Contract addresses essential infrastructure, a critical government function.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Public Administration and Utilities sector, specifically focusing on water supply and irrigation systems. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining essential services at federal facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal contracts for water system management and maintenance, as well as municipal budgets for similar services.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside requirement for this award (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular contract's structure.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the contracting agency, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Prison System. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific operational oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Operations
Public Infrastructure Maintenance
Water Resource Management Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for service interruption if follow-on contract is delayed.
Limited visibility into long-term infrastructure health beyond the contract period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $5.4 million to CITY OF WILDWOOD CITY HALL. FCC COLEMAN WATER AND WASTEWATER FY26 10/01/2025 - 01/30/2026 CONTRACT #15B30218D00000093

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CITY OF WILDWOOD CITY HALL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for water supply and irrigation systems by the Federal Prison System?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for water supply and irrigation systems by the Federal Prison System (FPS) is crucial for understanding budget trends and identifying potential areas for cost optimization. While specific data for this contract is limited to a single delivery order, a broader review of FPS expenditures over the past five to ten fiscal years would reveal the average contract values, the frequency of such awards, and the types of services procured. This analysis could highlight whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether there's a trend towards outsourcing these services or managing them in-house. Furthermore, examining the distribution of these funds across different facilities and geographic regions could provide insights into regional infrastructure needs and investment priorities. Comparing FPS spending to that of other federal agencies with similar facility management responsibilities could also offer valuable context for assessing the scale and scope of their investments in water infrastructure.

How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar water system maintenance contracts?

A direct per-unit cost comparison for this contract is challenging without more granular data on the specific services rendered and the volume of water managed. The contract value of approximately $5.4 million covers a 364-day period for water supply and irrigation systems. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable contracts that specify metrics such as cost per gallon treated, cost per mile of pipe maintained, or cost per inmate served. Additionally, factors like the age and condition of the infrastructure, the complexity of the water sources, and the regulatory environment in Wildwood, Florida, would influence pricing. Comparing this contract's overall value to the operational budgets of similar-sized federal facilities or municipal water utilities could provide a broader sense of its relative cost-effectiveness. Without such detailed comparative data, assessing the precise value for money on a per-unit basis remains speculative.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance under this delivery order?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance for this particular delivery order. Typically, for water supply and irrigation systems, KPIs would include metrics related to water quality compliance (e.g., meeting EPA standards), system reliability (e.g., minimizing service interruptions), operational efficiency (e.g., energy consumption for pumping), response times to maintenance issues, and adherence to safety protocols. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that performance would be measured against the defined scope of work and service level agreements, if any. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these aspects. A lack of explicitly stated KPIs in the public record can sometimes indicate that performance is managed through more qualitative assessments or standard operational procedures rather than quantifiable targets.

What is the track record of the City of Wildwood in managing federal contracts for infrastructure services?

Information regarding the City of Wildwood's specific track record in managing federal contracts for infrastructure services is not detailed in the provided data. As a municipal entity, the City of Wildwood likely has extensive experience managing its own water and wastewater systems, which involves operational, maintenance, and regulatory compliance responsibilities. However, its history with federal contracting, particularly for services delivered to federal agencies like the Bureau of Prisons, would require a separate investigation. This would involve searching federal contract databases for previous awards to the City of Wildwood, reviewing past performance evaluations, and assessing any history of contract disputes or successful project completions. Understanding their experience with federal procurement processes, reporting requirements, and performance standards is key to evaluating their capability and reliability as a federal contractor in this instance.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single delivery order for essential water services?

Relying on a single delivery order for essential water services, even under a firm fixed-price contract, carries certain risks. The primary risk is the limited duration and scope; if the need for these services extends beyond the current order's end date, a new procurement process would be required, potentially leading to a gap in service or increased costs if market conditions change unfavorably. Furthermore, a single delivery order may not fully capture the long-term maintenance needs or capital investment required for the water infrastructure. Unexpected issues or system failures not covered by the specific terms of the delivery order could necessitate additional, potentially costly, actions. While the firm fixed-price nature mitigates cost overruns for the defined scope, it doesn't eliminate the risk of service interruption if the contractor faces unforeseen operational challenges or if the contract scope proves insufficient for the actual needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Utilities › Water, Sewage and Other Systems › Water Supply and Irrigation Systems

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 N MAIN ST, WILDWOOD, FL, 34785

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. Local Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,398,875

Exercised Options: $5,398,875

Current Obligation: $5,398,875

Actual Outlays: $2,029,941

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15B30218D00000093

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline