DOJ's $6M contract for consulting services awarded to Steven D Hennigan, with a 6-month duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,000 ($6.0K)

Contractor: Steven D Hennigan

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-05-31

End Date: 2026-06-06

Contract Duration: 6 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTRUCTOR

Place of Performance

Location: CAPE CORAL, LEE County, FLORIDA, 33914

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $6,000 to STEVEN D HENNIGAN for work described as: INSTRUCTOR Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature and relatively short term. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a single award under a BPA Call, suggesting potential limitations in broad market engagement. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a fixed-price contract mitigating cost overrun risks. 4. Performance context is limited due to the nature of consulting services. 5. Sector positioning is within 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services', a broad category. 6. The contract's value is modest within the federal consulting landscape.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $6 million over six months for consulting services is a significant investment. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar consulting engagements would require detailed scope of work comparisons, but the per-year cost of $1 million for consulting services is within a plausible range for specialized expertise.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and awarded as a BPA Call. While SAP allows for competition, the specific details of how many offers were solicited or received are not provided. A BPA Call implies that a broader Basic Purchasing Agreement (BPA) may have been established previously, and this call was made against that agreement. The limited information suggests that competition might not have been full and open, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price achievable through a wider bidding process.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice, specifically the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, is the primary beneficiary, receiving specialized consulting services. The services delivered are categorized as 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services', indicating support for complex operational or analytical needs. The geographic impact is likely concentrated in Florida, where the contractor is based. Workforce implications are minimal, as this is a contract for external consulting rather than direct hiring.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed scope of work makes assessing the necessity and efficiency of the consulting services difficult.
Limited competition raises concerns about whether the government secured the best possible value.
The broad 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' category lacks specificity, hindering performance evaluation.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
The contract is awarded to a specific individual, Steven D Hennigan, suggesting potentially specialized expertise.
The contract duration is relatively short (6 months), allowing for periodic re-evaluation of needs.

Sector Analysis

The federal consulting services market is vast and diverse, encompassing a wide range of expertise from IT to scientific research. This contract falls under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services', a broad NAICS code (541690) that includes firms providing advice and assistance on scientific and technical matters. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on agency needs for specialized, often short-term, expertise that is not readily available internally. Benchmarking this $6 million contract requires understanding the specific nature of the consulting provided, but it represents a modest investment within the overall federal consulting spend.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved a small business set-aside. The award is to an individual, Steven D Hennigan, and information regarding subcontracting plans or impact on the small business ecosystem is not available. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small business participation is mandated or likely.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division within the Department of Justice. As a firm fixed-price contract awarded under SAP, the primary accountability measure is the delivery of agreed-upon services within the specified budget. Transparency is limited by the available data; details on performance reviews or specific oversight mechanisms are not publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Consulting Contracts
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Support Services
Federal Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Simplified Acquisition Procedures Contracts
Basic Purchasing Agreements (BPAs)

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Broad service category
Lack of detailed performance metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $6,000 to STEVEN D HENNIGAN. INSTRUCTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STEVEN D HENNIGAN.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-31. End: 2026-06-06.

What specific consulting services are being procured under this contract?

The contract is categorized under NAICS code 541690, 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services.' This is a broad classification that can encompass a wide array of specialized advisory and technical support functions. Without further details from the contract's statement of work, it is difficult to ascertain the precise nature of the services. These could range from policy analysis, technical assessments, program evaluation, scientific research support, or operational efficiency consulting. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) may require expertise in areas related to their mission, such as regulatory analysis, forensic science consultation, or strategic planning for law enforcement operations. The $6 million value suggests a significant scope or duration of the required expertise over the six-month period.

How does the $6 million contract value compare to similar consulting engagements within the DOJ or ATF?

Comparing the $6 million contract value requires context regarding the specific services rendered and the duration. As a six-month contract, this represents an annual run rate of $12 million if extended. Within the Department of Justice and its various agencies like the ATF, consulting contracts can vary significantly in value. Larger, multi-year engagements for complex IT systems or major policy initiatives can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, specialized advisory roles might be in the hundreds of thousands. A $6 million contract for six months of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' suggests a need for high-level expertise or a substantial project. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing it to other contracts for similar services (e.g., scientific advisory, technical consulting) within the ATF or other law enforcement agencies, considering factors like the number of consultants, their seniority, and the complexity of the tasks.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential underperformance by the contractor, scope creep, and the risk that the services may not fully meet the ATF's needs. Given the broad classification of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services,' there's also a risk of ambiguity in deliverables. Mitigation strategies are primarily embedded in the contract's structure. The 'Firm Fixed Price' (FFP) type contract is a key mitigation tool, as it places the responsibility for cost control on the contractor, limiting the government's financial exposure to cost overruns. The relatively short duration of six months also allows for more frequent oversight and the opportunity to reassess the need for services or contractor performance before committing to a longer term. Clear performance standards and regular progress reviews, though not detailed in the provided data, would be crucial oversight mechanisms.

What is the track record of Steven D Hennigan as a federal contractor?

Information regarding the specific track record of Steven D Hennigan as a federal contractor is not provided in the data summary. As an individual awardee, his past performance would typically be assessed by the contracting agency prior to award, especially if this is a new BPA Call or a competitive process. Federal procurement regulations often require agencies to consider past performance when making award decisions, particularly for contracts exceeding certain thresholds or when competition is limited. To assess his track record, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG for previous contract awards, performance evaluations, and any documented issues. Without this data, it's impossible to evaluate his history of delivering services, meeting deadlines, and adhering to contract terms for the government.

How does the competition level (BPA Call under SAP) impact the potential value for taxpayers?

The competition level, described as a 'BPA Call under SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggests a potentially limited competitive environment compared to full and open competition. Simplified Acquisition Procedures are designed for purchases below the SAT (Simplified Acquisition Threshold), typically allowing for less formal competition. A BPA Call means the contract was awarded against a pre-existing Basic Purchasing Agreement. While BPAs can streamline procurement, the competition for the initial BPA and subsequent calls can vary. If the BPA itself was not widely competed, or if this specific call solicited only a few vendors, taxpayers may not benefit from the full price discovery that robust competition offers. This could potentially lead to higher prices than might be achieved through a broader solicitation process, although the firm fixed-price nature does provide some cost certainty.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5536 FOREST COVE LN, AGOURA HILLS, CA, 91301

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,000

Exercised Options: $6,000

Current Obligation: $6,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15A00022AAQA00201

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline