DOJ's ATF awards $8M training contract to Albert Tallant, highlighting professional development needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,000 ($8.0K)

Contractor: Albert Tallant

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-26

End Date: 2026-05-08

Contract Duration: 12 days

Daily Burn Rate: $667/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTRUCTOR

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $8,000 to ALBERT TALLANT for work described as: INSTRUCTOR Key points: 1. Contract focuses on professional and management development, indicating a need for enhanced skills within the agency. 2. The award value of $8 million suggests a significant investment in personnel training. 3. The contract duration of 12 months allows for focused development over a defined period. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the agency. 5. The award was made under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a focus on efficiency for smaller procurements. 6. The geographic location of the awardee in Alabama may indicate a focus on regional training delivery or a specific talent pool.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8 million for professional and management development training is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training contracts is difficult without more specific details on the curriculum and duration. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to control costs. The award to a single entity implies a potentially competitive bidding process that resulted in a favorable price for the government, though further analysis of the specific services rendered would be needed for a definitive value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a broader range of competition than micro-purchases but is streamlined compared to full and open competition for larger contracts. While the exact number of bidders is not specified, SAP is designed to encourage competition among qualified vendors. The use of SAP suggests that the agency sought competitive bids while maintaining efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: Competing under SAP generally leads to better price discovery and value for taxpayers compared to sole-source awards, as multiple vendors have an opportunity to bid.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) are the primary beneficiaries, receiving enhanced professional and management skills. The services delivered include professional and management development training, aimed at improving leadership and operational effectiveness. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational areas, though the training itself may be delivered remotely or at specific locations. Workforce implications include upskilling of federal employees, potentially leading to improved job performance, career advancement, and agency efficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the training curriculum makes it difficult to assess the direct impact on operational effectiveness.
The $8 million award size could indicate a need for more robust training programs than initially apparent, potentially signaling underlying skill gaps.
Reliance on a single contractor for such a significant training investment carries a risk if the contractor underperforms or faces issues.

Positive Signals

The firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and incentivizes the contractor to deliver within budget.
Competition under SAP suggests that multiple vendors were considered, likely leading to a more competitive price.
The clear focus on professional and management development indicates a proactive approach to workforce enhancement.

Sector Analysis

The professional and management development training sector is a significant market within government contracting. Agencies across all departments invest heavily in training to ensure their workforce remains skilled and effective. This contract fits within the broader professional services category, which includes a wide array of support functions for government operations. Benchmarks for similar training contracts vary widely based on the specific skills taught, duration, and number of participants.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was competed under SAP and does not specify any small business set-aside. While the awardee is listed as a firm, its size status (small or large business) is not provided. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem or subcontracting opportunities. Future analysis could explore if subcontracting plans were a requirement or if small businesses were encouraged to participate.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division within the Department of Justice. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by tying payment to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, allowing for general oversight. Specific performance monitoring and quality assurance would be managed internally by the contracting officer's representative (COR).

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Training Programs
Federal Workforce Development Initiatives
Law Enforcement Training Contracts
Professional Services Contracts
Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) Awards

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to SAP for a large contract value.
Contractor performance risk due to reliance on a single entity.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data.
Unclear small business participation or subcontracting opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $8,000 to ALBERT TALLANT. INSTRUCTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALBERT TALLANT.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-26. End: 2026-05-08.

What specific professional and management development topics are covered under this $8 million contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Professional and Management Development Training' (NAICS 611430). However, the specific topics, modules, or curriculum are not detailed in the summary. Typically, such training can encompass a wide range of subjects including leadership skills, strategic planning, project management, communication, team building, conflict resolution, and performance management. To understand the precise focus, one would need to review the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS). This would clarify whether the training is general or tailored to specific needs within the ATF, such as supervisory training for agents or management development for administrative staff.

How does the $8 million award value compare to historical spending on similar training by the ATF or DOJ?

Without access to historical spending data for the ATF or the broader Department of Justice (DOJ) specifically on professional and management development training, a direct comparison is challenging. The $8 million figure represents a significant investment. To benchmark this, one would need to analyze past contracts for similar training services, considering factors like the number of employees trained, the duration of the training programs, and the complexity of the subject matter. A preliminary assessment suggests this is a substantial allocation, potentially indicating a strategic focus on enhancing leadership and operational capabilities within the ATF, or addressing identified skill gaps across a significant portion of its workforce.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this training contract?

The provided contract summary does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics for evaluating the success of this training. Typically, for professional and management development training, success is measured through a combination of methods. These often include participant satisfaction surveys, pre- and post-training assessments to gauge knowledge acquisition, supervisor feedback on employee performance changes, and potentially longer-term measures like promotion rates or improved team performance. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these metrics as outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) to ensure the contractor meets performance expectations.

What is the track record of the contractor, Albert Tallant, in delivering federal training programs of this scale?

Information regarding the specific track record of Albert Tallant in delivering federal training programs of this scale is not provided in the summary data. To assess their capabilities, one would typically look at past performance evaluations on federal contracts, the number and value of previous training awards, client testimonials, and any documented successes or failures. A review of the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or other contract databases could reveal past performance history, including any awards or terminations for default. Without this external data, it's difficult to ascertain their experience level and reliability for an $8 million contract.

What is the risk associated with a single contractor being awarded this substantial training contract?

The primary risk associated with a single contractor, Albert Tallant, being awarded this $8 million training contract is dependency. If the contractor fails to perform adequately, experiences financial instability, or faces other operational issues, it could disrupt the ATF's training initiatives. This could lead to delays, cost overruns if a new contractor needs to be found, and a potential gap in essential professional development for agency personnel. Mitigating this risk involves robust contract oversight, clear performance standards, and contingency planning by the agency to address potential contractor failures.

How does the use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) impact the competition and potential value for this $8 million contract?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for purchases up to $250,000, though certain exceptions and thresholds can apply, and the data indicates this $8M contract was competed under SAP. While SAP aims to streamline the procurement process and increase efficiency, it typically involves a less extensive competition than full and open procedures for larger contracts. For an $8 million contract, using SAP might suggest a specific justification or a unique procurement environment. The level of competition achieved under SAP for this specific award would determine its impact on price discovery and value for taxpayers. If multiple qualified vendors submitted competitive bids, good value could be achieved; however, if competition was limited, the price might be higher than if procured through a more extensive process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5080 SR 30A, PORT SAINT JOE, FL, 32456

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,000

Exercised Options: $8,000

Current Obligation: $8,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15A00022AAQA00012

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline