DOJ's $8M contract for educational support services awarded to Mark Harri for 12 months

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,000 ($8.0K)

Contractor: Harri, Mark

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-26

End Date: 2026-05-08

Contract Duration: 12 days

Daily Burn Rate: $667/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTRUCTOR

Place of Performance

Location: BLAIRSDEN GRAEAGLE, PLUMAS County, CALIFORNIA, 96103

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $8,000 to HARRI, MARK for work described as: INSTRUCTOR Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized educational support services. 2. Competition dynamics are unclear due to limited information on the award. 3. Potential risks include contractor performance and adherence to educational standards. 4. This contract supports the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) mission. 5. The service category falls under educational support, a niche but vital area.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $8 million for 12 months of educational support services requires further benchmarking. Without details on the specific services rendered, it's difficult to compare to similar contracts or assess value for money. The fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but the per-unit cost is not provided, making a precise pricing assessment challenging. The absence of detailed performance metrics also limits a thorough value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The award details state 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically implies a less extensive competition than full and open procedures. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to assess the level of competition. SAP is often used for smaller value procurements, and while this contract is $8 million, its use suggests potential limitations in the competitive process or specific justifications for using SAP.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited information on competition raises questions about whether taxpayers received the best possible price. A more robust competition could have potentially driven down costs or yielded a wider range of innovative solutions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely ATF personnel requiring specialized educational support. Services delivered are expected to enhance training and professional development within the agency. The geographic impact is centered in California, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized instructors or curriculum developers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the competitive process.
Unclear performance metrics and deliverables for the educational support.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed under fixed-price.
Limited information on contractor's past performance in similar educational support roles.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a single entity, potentially indicating specialized expertise.
Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty if scope is well-defined.
Contract duration of 12 months allows for focused service delivery.

Sector Analysis

Educational support services represent a segment within the broader professional services market. This contract likely falls under the government's need for specialized training and development programs. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific nature of the educational services, such as curriculum development, specialized instruction, or technical training.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary consideration for this specific award. There is no indication of a small business set-aside. Subcontracting implications are unknown without further details on the contract's structure and the prime contractor's strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms are presumed to be managed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division. Accountability would be tied to the contract's performance clauses and deliverables. Transparency is limited by the available data, particularly concerning the competitive process and detailed service scope.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Training
Government Professional Development Programs
Contracting for Specialized Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition information
Unspecified performance metrics
Lack of detailed service description

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $8,000 to HARRI, MARK. INSTRUCTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HARRI, MARK.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-26. End: 2026-05-08.

What specific educational support services are being procured under this contract?

The provided data identifies the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as 611710, which corresponds to 'Educational Support Services'. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. This could range from curriculum development, instructional design, specialized training delivery, educational technology support, or administrative services related to education and training programs within the ATF. A deeper dive into the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS) would be necessary to understand the precise deliverables and scope.

How does the $8 million contract value compare to similar educational support services contracts awarded by federal agencies?

Benchmarking this $8 million contract requires comparing it to similar educational support services contracts, ideally within law enforcement or similar government agencies. Without knowing the specific services (e.g., leadership training, technical skills development, compliance education), a direct comparison is difficult. However, $8 million for 12 months of specialized services is a significant investment. Agencies often procure such services through various contract vehicles, including GSA schedules or agency-specific IDIQs. A comprehensive analysis would involve searching contract databases for similar NAICS codes and service descriptions to establish a market rate or typical spending range.

What is the track record of the contractor, Mark Harri, in delivering educational support services to the federal government?

Information regarding Mark Harri's specific track record in delivering educational support services to the federal government is not provided in the initial data. To assess this, one would need to research federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous awards to this contractor, particularly under NAICS code 611710 or related service categories. Examining past performance evaluations, contract modifications, and any reported issues or successes would provide crucial insights into their capabilities and reliability in fulfilling similar requirements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this contract. Typically, for educational support services, KPIs might include trainee satisfaction rates, knowledge retention scores, successful completion rates of training programs, adherence to curriculum standards, or timely delivery of educational materials. The contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS) would outline these specific metrics and the methods for measuring contractor performance. Without this information, assessing the effectiveness and value derived from the contract is challenging.

What is the historical spending pattern for educational support services by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for educational support services by the ATF would require accessing historical federal procurement data. This involves querying databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) for contracts awarded by the ATF under NAICS code 611710 or related categories over several fiscal years. Understanding past spending levels, the types of services procured, and the contractors frequently used can provide context for the current $8 million award. It can reveal trends, identify areas of consistent need, and highlight potential opportunities for cost savings or improved service delivery through strategic sourcing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Educational Support Services › Educational Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4180 BARTON RD, LOOMIS, CA, 95650

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,000

Exercised Options: $8,000

Current Obligation: $8,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15A00022AAQA00295

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline