Interior Department awards $3.9M satellite service contract to Delta Bridge, Inc. for Wyoming operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,015 ($39.0K)

Contractor: Delta Bridge, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 267 days

Daily Burn Rate: $146/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IMT CALL 7 - COMMERCIAL SATELLITE SERVIC

Place of Performance

Location: ALCOVA, NATRONA County, WYOMING, 82620

State: Wyoming Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $39,015 to DELTA BRIDGE, INC. for work described as: IMT CALL 7 - COMMERCIAL SATELLITE SERVIC Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized satellite telecommunications services. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially limited bidding process under SAP. 3. Performance risk is moderate, given the firm-fixed-price structure. 4. This contract supports essential communication infrastructure in a remote region. 5. The award falls within the broader IT and telecommunications sector spending. 6. Duration of 267 days suggests a focused, short-term operational need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.9 million for satellite telecommunications services seems aligned with market rates for specialized support. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for satellite bandwidth and ground station access would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined scope, which can help control costs. The duration of the contract (less than a year) also implies a specific, potentially short-term need, making the overall expenditure appear manageable.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a more limited number of bidders compared to full and open competition. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP is generally used for acquisitions below certain thresholds, suggesting that the competition may not have been as broad as possible. This can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing, although the firm-fixed-price nature aims to mitigate cost overruns.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, limited competition under SAP may mean a slightly higher price than could be achieved through a wider bidding process. However, the efficiency gains of SAP for smaller procurements can also offset some administrative costs.

Public Impact

The Bureau of Reclamation benefits from enhanced satellite telecommunications services. Essential communication services are delivered to support operations in Wyoming. The geographic impact is concentrated in Wyoming, specifically the state of Wyoming. Workforce implications are likely minimal, with the contract focused on service provision rather than direct personnel augmentation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited price discovery due to competition under SAP.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical communication services in a specific region.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Contract supports essential government operations in a remote area.
Clear end date limits long-term financial commitment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology and Telecommunications sector, specifically focusing on satellite-based communication services. The market for commercial satellite services is robust, with numerous providers offering various solutions from low-earth orbit to geostationary satellites. Federal agencies increasingly rely on commercial satellite services for data transmission, remote operations, and backup communications, especially in areas with limited terrestrial infrastructure. Spending in this category is driven by the need for reliable, high-bandwidth connectivity.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included a small business set-aside or if Delta Bridge, Inc. is a small business. Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would require further investigation into the contract's specific terms and the contractor's practices. Without this information, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Bureau of Reclamation's contracting officers and program managers within the Department of the Interior. Accountability is established through the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services by the performance end date. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though detailed performance metrics are not publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Commercial Satellite Services
Telecommunications Services
Bureau of Reclamation IT Contracts
Department of the Interior IT Spending

Risk Flags

Limited competition potential
Contract duration less than one year

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $39,015 to DELTA BRIDGE, INC.. IMT CALL 7 - COMMERCIAL SATELLITE SERVIC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELTA BRIDGE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Reclamation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39,015.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-12-31.

What is Delta Bridge, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly for satellite services?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Delta Bridge, Inc. has been awarded multiple federal contracts, primarily within the telecommunications and IT services domain. While specific details on their satellite service performance history require deeper analysis of past contract performance reports (e.g., CPARS), their continued awards suggest a satisfactory performance record. Further investigation into their specific experience with commercial satellite services, including the types of satellites and ground infrastructure supported, would be beneficial for a comprehensive risk assessment. Their presence in federal contracting suggests they are familiar with government procurement processes and compliance requirements.

How does the $3.9 million contract value compare to similar satellite service contracts awarded by the federal government?

The $3.9 million value for this 267-day contract for satellite telecommunications services appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized federal procurements. However, direct comparisons are challenging without knowing the exact service level agreements (SLAs), bandwidth requirements, geographic coverage, and duration of comparable contracts. Contracts for similar services can range from tens of thousands for short-term, low-bandwidth needs to millions for extensive, high-capacity, long-duration deployments. Given the firm-fixed-price structure and the relatively short period, this award suggests a focused operational requirement rather than a large-scale, long-term infrastructure investment.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential service disruptions, performance deficiencies by the contractor, and cost overruns if the scope is not precisely managed. Mitigation strategies are embedded in the contract structure: the firm-fixed-price (FFP) nature caps the government's financial liability and incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently. The relatively short duration (267 days) limits the exposure to long-term performance issues. Furthermore, the contract's competition under SAP, while potentially limited, suggests a level of vetting. The Bureau of Reclamation's oversight and potential use of performance metrics will also play a crucial role in risk mitigation.

How effective is the Bureau of Reclamation's use of commercial satellite services for its operations in remote areas like Wyoming?

The Bureau of Reclamation's utilization of commercial satellite services, as evidenced by this contract, is likely driven by the necessity of providing reliable communication in remote areas where terrestrial infrastructure is unavailable or insufficient. These services are critical for operational efficiency, data collection, monitoring of water resources, and emergency response coordination. The effectiveness hinges on the quality of service provided by contractors like Delta Bridge, Inc., adherence to SLAs, and the integration of these services into the Bureau's broader operational framework. Past awards suggest a continued reliance, indicating perceived effectiveness in meeting operational needs.

What are the historical spending patterns for satellite telecommunications services within the Department of the Interior?

Historical spending patterns for satellite telecommunications services within the Department of the Interior (DOI) show a consistent and often increasing reliance on these technologies. Agencies within the DOI, such as the Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, operate across vast geographical areas, many of which are remote. This necessitates robust communication solutions. Spending in this category is influenced by factors like technological advancements (e.g., higher bandwidth capabilities), the need for real-time data, and the expansion or modernization of agency operations. While specific year-over-year figures require detailed analysis, the trend generally reflects a growing dependence on commercial satellite capabilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Satellite Telecommunications › Satellite Telecommunications

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC

Address: 1400-A DUKE ST, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,015

Exercised Options: $39,015

Current Obligation: $39,015

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140R8124A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline