Interior's $3.56M contract for land management and public safety services awarded to Acadia Protective Services II, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,561,374 ($3.6M)

Contractor: Acadia Protective Services II, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2021-09-21

End Date: 2026-09-20

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES AT PARKER DAM

Place of Performance

Location: PARKER DAM, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92267

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $3.6 million to ACADIA PROTECTIVE SERVICES II, LLC for work described as: LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES AT PARKER DAM Key points: 1. The contract value of $3.56 million over five years suggests a moderate annual spend for security services. 2. The award was made under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a specific reason for excluding other vendors after an initial broad solicitation. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of 1825 days (5 years) provides long-term stability for service delivery. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to specialized security guard services. 6. The contract is managed by the Bureau of Reclamation, a key agency within the Department of the Interior.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.56 million over five years equates to approximately $712,000 annually for security services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for land management and public safety services is challenging without more specific details on the scope of services and geographic coverage. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. Further analysis would require comparing the per-guard cost and service hours to industry standards for similar federal contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This procurement method implies that while the initial solicitation was open, specific sources were excluded from the final competition. The reasons for exclusion are not detailed, but it suggests a narrowed field of bidders, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery. The number of offers received (6) indicates some level of competition, but the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into the justification.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even after an initial open competition, may limit the government's ability to secure the most competitive pricing. Taxpayers may not benefit from the full range of potential cost savings that a truly open and unrestricted competition could yield.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation, ensuring the security and management of public lands and facilities. Services delivered include security guards and patrol services, crucial for maintaining order and safety. The contract's geographic impact is focused on California, where Parker Dam is located. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local workforce in California.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'Exclusion of Sources' aspect of the competition raises questions about whether the most competitive pricing was achieved.
Lack of detailed service scope makes it difficult to benchmark value for money effectively.
The specific reasons for excluding sources are not readily apparent, potentially obscuring transparency.

Positive Signals

The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration of five years offers stability in service provision.
The award to a specific entity suggests a successful match for the required services.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant part of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. Federal contracts for security guards and patrol services are common across various agencies, particularly those managing physical assets and public spaces. The market size for federal security services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from large corporations to smaller specialized firms. This contract fits within the government's ongoing need for physical security and operational support at federal facilities and public lands.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Acadia Protective Services II, LLC, is likely a medium to large-sized business given the contract value. The absence of a small business set-aside means opportunities for small business participation through subcontracting are not mandated by this specific award mechanism.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Reclamation's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available. The Inspector General for the Department of the Interior would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of the Interior Security Contracts
Bureau of Reclamation Operations Support
Federal Security Guard Services
Public Lands Management Contracts
Law Enforcement Support Services

Risk Flags

Competition Method Concerns
Lack of Detailed Scope Information
Potential for Limited Price Discovery

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $3.6 million to ACADIA PROTECTIVE SERVICES II, LLC. LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES AT PARKER DAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACADIA PROTECTIVE SERVICES II, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Reclamation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-21. End: 2026-09-20.

What specific services are included under 'LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES' for this contract?

The contract specifies Security Guards and Patrol Services (NAICS code 561612). This typically includes providing personnel to monitor premises, deter unauthorized access, respond to incidents, patrol designated areas, and maintain logs of activities. For land management and public safety at Parker Dam, these services likely involve securing the dam infrastructure, surrounding public access areas, and potentially assisting with visitor safety and enforcement of regulations within the Bureau of Reclamation's jurisdiction. The exact scope would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), which is not provided in the summary data.

What is the significance of the procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'?

This procurement method is unusual. It suggests that an initial solicitation was made under full and open competition, but for reasons not specified, certain potential offerors were excluded from the final evaluation and award phase. This could occur if, for example, only a limited number of vendors possessed specific certifications, security clearances, or unique capabilities required after the initial solicitation, or if there were issues with proposals received in the first round. While it implies some level of competition, the exclusion of sources means the government did not consider all potentially capable vendors, which could impact the final price and potentially limit the best value outcome for taxpayers.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type benefit the government in this scenario?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract is advantageous for the government because it establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must adhere to, regardless of their actual costs. This shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For services like security guards, where the scope of work is generally well-defined, an FFP contract provides budget certainty and predictability. It simplifies financial management and reduces the need for extensive cost monitoring by the government, allowing contracting officers to focus more on performance oversight.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar security services at Parker Dam or by the Bureau of Reclamation?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for this specific contract or for similar services at Parker Dam or by the Bureau of Reclamation. To assess historical spending, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded for security services at this location or by this agency. Comparing the current $3.56 million award over five years ($712,000 annually) to previous contract values would reveal whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable. This context is crucial for understanding trends and identifying potential anomalies in current spending.

What is the track record of Acadia Protective Services II, LLC with federal contracts?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of Acadia Protective Services II, LLC. To assess their performance history, one would need to search federal contract databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous awards to this contractor, examine past performance reviews, and identify any instances of contract disputes, terminations, or outstanding performance issues. A strong track record with successful contract completion and positive past performance evaluations would indicate a lower risk for this current award.

Are there any specific risks associated with providing security services in the Parker Dam area?

Providing security services at a critical infrastructure site like Parker Dam can involve specific risks. These may include the potential for unauthorized access to sensitive areas, the need for rapid response to security breaches or emergencies, and the requirement for personnel with appropriate security clearances and training. Environmental factors in the California desert region could also pose challenges. Furthermore, the remote location might affect personnel availability and response times. The contract's success hinges on the contractor's ability to mitigate these risks through robust security protocols, well-trained personnel, and effective coordination with relevant authorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 140R3021R0031

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 19 N MAIN ST STE 2711, TEMPLE, TX, 76501

Business Categories: Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,834,025

Exercised Options: $3,834,025

Current Obligation: $3,561,374

Actual Outlays: $3,288,154

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline