Interior Department awards $19.2M for office furniture, with MillerKnoll Inc. as the primary contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,172 ($19.2K)

Contractor: Millerknoll Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $213/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NIFC 300-PURCHASE OF FURNITURE DIRECTOR

Place of Performance

Location: BOISE, ADA County, IDAHO, 83705

State: Idaho Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $19,171.61 to MILLERKNOLL INC for work described as: NIFC 300-PURCHASE OF FURNITURE DIRECTOR Key points: 1. The contract focuses on office furniture, a recurring need for federal agencies. 2. Competition was robust, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration is relatively short, indicating a need for timely delivery. 4. The specific product category is well-defined, reducing scope creep risk. 5. This award aligns with broader federal procurement trends for essential office supplies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.2 million for office furniture appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar federal furniture procurements would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. However, without detailed unit pricing or comparison to commercial equivalents, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and quality for the government. This approach maximizes the opportunity for diverse suppliers to participate.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of quality goods. This process ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, driving efficiency and cost savings.

Public Impact

Federal employees across various departments will benefit from updated and functional office spaces. The contract ensures the provision of essential office furniture, supporting daily operations. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as the Bureau of Land Management operates across the United States. The contract supports jobs within the office furniture manufacturing and supply chain sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for overstocking or understocking of specific furniture items if demand forecasting is inaccurate.
Risk of delivery delays impacting agency readiness if supply chain issues arise.
Ensuring compliance with accessibility standards for all furniture procured.

Positive Signals

The use of a fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
The contractor, MillerKnoll Inc., is an established entity in the furniture industry.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector is a mature industry with established players. Federal spending in this area is consistent, driven by agency needs for outfitting offices, replacing worn-out items, and supporting new facilities. This contract fits within the broader category of general services and supplies procurement, where agencies rely on competitive bidding to secure necessary goods. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing historical furniture procurements by various federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside, it's crucial to assess subcontracting opportunities. Large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to subcontract portions of their work to small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem depends on MillerKnoll's subcontracting plan and adherence to small business utilization goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Bureau of Land Management's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including delivery schedules and product specifications. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are publicly reported. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) for Office Furniture
General Services Administration (GSA) Procurement Data
Department of Defense Furniture Contracts
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Procurement Policies

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions impacting delivery timelines.
Risk of furniture quality not meeting specified standards.
Ensuring compliance with all federal accessibility and safety regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $19,171.61 to MILLERKNOLL INC. NIFC 300-PURCHASE OF FURNITURE DIRECTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MILLERKNOLL INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19,171.61.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is MillerKnoll Inc.'s track record with federal government contracts, particularly for office furniture?

MillerKnoll Inc., a well-established furniture manufacturer, has a history of federal contracts. Analyzing their past performance, including on-time delivery rates, quality of goods provided, and any past performance issues or awards, is crucial. Federal procurement data often includes past performance information, which can be reviewed to assess their reliability and suitability for this specific award. Their experience with similar large-scale furniture procurements for government agencies would indicate their capacity to fulfill this contract effectively.

How does the awarded price compare to similar federal office furniture contracts awarded over the past two years?

To assess value for money, the awarded amount of $19.2 million needs to be benchmarked against comparable federal office furniture contracts. This involves examining contracts with similar scope, quantity, and duration awarded by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA), Department of Defense, or other civilian agencies. Factors such as the specific types of furniture (e.g., desks, chairs, filing cabinets), materials, and any included services (e.g., delivery, installation) must be considered. A significant deviation from historical pricing trends, either higher or lower, would warrant further investigation into the underlying reasons, such as market fluctuations, unique requirements, or competitive dynamics.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks include potential delivery delays due to supply chain disruptions, quality control issues with the furniture, and the possibility of the procured items not meeting specific ergonomic or accessibility standards. Mitigation strategies typically involve clear contract terms with defined delivery schedules and quality specifications, performance bonds, and inspection protocols. The fixed-price nature of the contract also incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and timelines effectively. The Bureau of Land Management's oversight and the potential involvement of the Inspector General serve as further risk mitigation measures.

How effective is the Bureau of Land Management in managing its furniture procurement contracts to ensure optimal value?

The effectiveness of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in managing furniture procurement contracts can be assessed by examining their historical contract performance data. This includes metrics such as on-time delivery rates, contract modifications, and the number of disputes or claims. Their utilization of contract vehicles like the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) versus direct procurements, and the success of their competitive bidding processes, also provide insights. Analyzing the BLM's procurement history for furniture can reveal patterns of efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to best practices in contract administration.

What has been the historical spending trend for office furniture by the Department of the Interior over the last five fiscal years?

Analyzing the Department of the Interior's (DOI) historical spending on office furniture over the past five fiscal years would reveal trends in procurement volume and value. This data can indicate whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, potentially influenced by agency growth, budget allocations, or consolidation efforts. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the current $19.2 million award, assessing if it represents a typical expenditure or an outlier. Such analysis also informs future budget planning and procurement strategies for the DOI.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 140L3726Q0032

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Millerknoll, Inc.

Address: 855 E MAIN AVE, ZEELAND, MI, 49464

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,172

Exercised Options: $19,172

Current Obligation: $19,172

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS03F036DA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline