Teton Dam Reconstruction contract awarded to STGP MALCOLM JV LLC for $6.01M, emphasizing heavy civil engineering

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,008,638 ($6.0M)

Contractor: Stgp Malcolm JV LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2025-09-16

End Date: 2026-11-20

Contract Duration: 430 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: GAOA TETON DAM RECONSTRUCTION

Place of Performance

Location: RAWLINS, CARBON County, WYOMING, 82301

State: Wyoming Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $6.0 million to STGP MALCOLM JV LLC for work described as: GAOA TETON DAM RECONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. The contract value of $6.01M for reconstruction suggests a significant investment in critical infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this indicates a robust bidding process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 4. The project duration of 430 days points to a substantial, multi-year construction effort. 5. The Bureau of Land Management's award highlights the importance of this infrastructure for federal land management. 6. The contractor, STGP MALCOLM JV LLC, will be responsible for heavy and civil engineering construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.01M for the Teton Dam Reconstruction appears reasonable for a project of this nature, involving heavy civil engineering. Benchmarking against similar dam repair or reconstruction projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively, but the final cost will depend on the scope and unforeseen challenges during the 430-day performance period. Without specific cost breakdowns or comparable project data, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the award to a joint venture implies capability for complex tasks.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered after initial exclusions. The presence of 5 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally leads to better pricing and value for the government. The specific exclusion of sources might warrant further investigation to ensure it did not unduly limit competition. However, the overall indication is that the Bureau of Land Management sought a broad range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process for this reconstruction project is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down the final contract price and ensured the selection of a capable contractor at a fair market rate.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal land management agencies, specifically the Bureau of Land Management, ensuring the integrity of federal infrastructure. The services delivered include heavy and civil engineering construction, crucial for maintaining and upgrading the Teton Dam. The geographic impact is concentrated in Wyoming, where the Teton Dam is located, potentially affecting local resources and employment. Workforce implications may include the creation of temporary construction jobs in the region, benefiting skilled labor in heavy civil engineering.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen geological or structural issues arise during reconstruction, despite the firm-fixed-price contract.
Dependence on the joint venture's ability to manage complex logistics and specialized construction requirements for dam infrastructure.
Environmental impact during construction activities requires careful monitoring and mitigation strategies.
The exclusion of sources in the competition, while potentially justified, could warrant a review to ensure maximum competition was achieved.

Positive Signals

Award to a joint venture (STGP MALCOLM JV LLC) suggests a pooling of expertise and resources for a complex project.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, reducing the risk of budget overruns.
The project's focus on reconstruction indicates a commitment to maintaining critical federal infrastructure.
The 430-day performance period allows for a structured and thorough approach to the reconstruction work.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction sector, a critical component of the broader Construction industry. This sector involves large-scale infrastructure projects such as dams, bridges, and highways. Spending in this area is often driven by government needs for infrastructure maintenance, upgrades, and new development. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other federal or state contracts for dam repair, water management infrastructure, or similar large-scale civil works, considering project complexity and regional labor costs.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. The award to a joint venture, STGP MALCOLM JV LLC, suggests a focus on larger, established entities capable of undertaking significant civil engineering projects. This may limit direct opportunities for small businesses to participate as prime contractors on this specific award, though they might be involved as subcontractors if the prime contractor opts to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Bureau of Land Management, the awarding agency. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal contract databases where such awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's performance or closeout.

Related Government Programs

Federal Dam Safety Programs
Bureau of Land Management Infrastructure Projects
Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects
Department of the Interior Capital Investments

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Contractor performance risk on a complex civil engineering project.
Environmental compliance during construction activities.
Adequacy of competition despite 'exclusion of sources' clause.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $6.0 million to STGP MALCOLM JV LLC. GAOA TETON DAM RECONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STGP MALCOLM JV LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-16. End: 2026-11-20.

What is the track record of STGP MALCOLM JV LLC in similar heavy civil engineering projects, particularly those involving dam reconstruction?

Assessing the track record of STGP MALCOLM JV LLC is crucial for understanding their capability to successfully execute the Teton Dam Reconstruction. As a joint venture, its performance history would be a composite of its constituent members' past projects. A thorough review would involve examining prior contracts for similar scope, complexity, and scale, specifically looking for experience with dam structures, water management systems, and large-scale civil engineering undertakings. Key performance indicators to scrutinize include on-time and on-budget completion rates, quality of work, safety records, and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Information on their past performance can often be found in federal contract databases (like SAM.gov) or through industry-specific project repositories. Without specific data on STGP MALCOLM JV LLC's prior projects, it's difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact that they were selected through a competitive process.

How does the awarded amount of $6.01M compare to the estimated cost or budget for the Teton Dam Reconstruction project?

The awarded amount of $6.01M represents the government's commitment to the contractor for the Teton Dam Reconstruction. To assess its value, this figure needs to be compared against the initial cost estimates or allocated budget for the project. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than estimates, it could indicate successful competition or potentially an underestimated scope. Conversely, if it's higher, it might suggest unforeseen complexities or a less competitive bidding environment than anticipated. The Bureau of Land Management's internal budgeting process and any independent cost analyses would provide context. Furthermore, comparing this figure to the cost of similar dam reconstruction projects, adjusted for scale, complexity, and location, is essential for a robust value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract means this $6.01M is the ceiling, but the final expenditure could be less if the contractor achieves efficiencies.

What are the primary risks associated with the Teton Dam Reconstruction project, and how are they being mitigated?

The Teton Dam Reconstruction project likely carries several inherent risks typical of large civil engineering endeavors. Primary among these are potential geological or structural surprises within the dam's foundation or existing structure, which could lead to scope changes and cost overruns, even with a firm-fixed-price contract. Environmental risks, such as unexpected discoveries of protected species or contamination, could also cause delays and necessitate additional mitigation measures. Furthermore, the performance risk lies with the contractor, STGP MALCOLM JV LLC, ensuring they possess the necessary expertise, equipment, and workforce to complete the project successfully. Mitigation strategies typically include thorough pre-construction site investigations, robust environmental impact assessments, contingency planning for unforeseen conditions, and stringent quality assurance/quality control processes overseen by the contracting agency. The firm-fixed-price contract itself acts as a risk-sharing mechanism, placing the onus on the contractor to manage costs within the agreed-upon price.

What is the historical spending pattern for Teton Dam maintenance and reconstruction, and how does this award fit into that trend?

Analyzing historical spending on the Teton Dam is crucial for understanding the context of this $6.01M award. Past expenditures would reveal the frequency and scale of maintenance, repairs, or previous reconstruction efforts. This information helps determine if the current award represents a significant increase or decrease in investment, or if it aligns with a consistent pattern of infrastructure upkeep. For instance, if there has been minimal spending in recent years, this large award might signal a deferred maintenance issue coming to a head. Conversely, if the dam has undergone frequent, smaller repairs, this project could represent a comprehensive overhaul. Understanding this historical context allows for an assessment of whether federal resources are being allocated appropriately to ensure the long-term safety and functionality of the Teton Dam, and whether this award is a proactive measure or a response to escalating problems.

What specific engineering challenges are anticipated for the Teton Dam Reconstruction, and how does the contract address them?

The Teton Dam Reconstruction likely involves specific engineering challenges related to the dam's age, original construction methods, geological setting, and potential environmental factors. These could include issues with structural integrity, seepage control, foundation stability, or the need to upgrade components to meet modern safety standards. The contract addresses these challenges primarily through its detailed scope of work, which should outline the specific reconstruction tasks required. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to identify and plan for these challenges efficiently to remain profitable. However, the effectiveness of the contract in addressing unforeseen engineering hurdles depends heavily on the thoroughness of the initial site assessments and the clarity of the contract's provisions for handling design changes or differing site conditions. The selection of STGP MALCOLM JV LLC, a joint venture, suggests an expectation that they possess the specialized engineering expertise required.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 140L0625R0013

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3700 CENTERPOINT DRIVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,008,638

Exercised Options: $6,008,638

Current Obligation: $6,008,638

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline