Interior's USGS awards $7.75M contract for student services to Drew Jackson, with 4 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,752 ($7.8K)

Contractor: Drew Jackson

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2028-04-08

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: STUDENT SERVICES CONTRACT - DREW JACKSON

Place of Performance

Location: TROY, RENSSELAER County, NEW YORK, 12180

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $7,752 to DREW JACKSON for work described as: STUDENT SERVICES CONTRACT - DREW JACKSON Key points: 1. The contract value of $7.75 million over two years suggests a moderate investment in student support services. 2. Competition was present with 4 bidders, indicating some level of market interest for these services. 3. The contract type is a purchase order, typically used for simpler, smaller-value acquisitions. 4. The duration of 730 days aligns with standard project timelines for professional services. 5. The primary service category is 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' suggesting a broad scope. 6. The contract is set to expire in April 2028, providing a defined period for service delivery.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $7.75 million contract for student services is challenging without specific deliverables. However, the presence of 4 bidders suggests a competitive environment that may have helped control costs. Compared to similar professional services contracts, the per-year cost of approximately $3.875 million appears within a reasonable range, assuming the scope of services is substantial. Further analysis would require understanding the specific tasks and outcomes expected.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which allows for a broader range of competition than micro-purchases but is less formal than full and open competition for larger contracts. With 4 bidders, the competition level indicates that multiple firms were interested and capable of providing the required services. This level of competition is generally sufficient to promote price discovery and encourage competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competition among 4 bidders suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered, as multiple vendors vied for the contract, driving down potential costs.

Public Impact

Students utilizing the services provided by Drew Jackson will benefit from professional and technical support. The services delivered are expected to enhance the student experience and potentially aid in academic or career development. The contract is geographically focused on New York (NY), indicating the primary service delivery location. The contract may have implications for the workforce in the New York area, creating employment opportunities for individuals with relevant professional and technical skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and value for money.
The broad 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category could lead to scope creep or unclear deliverables.
Reliance on a single purchase order for a significant duration might limit flexibility if needs change.

Positive Signals

The contract was competed, indicating an effort to achieve fair market value.
Multiple bidders (4) suggest a healthy level of interest and capability in the market for these services.
The defined end date provides a clear timeframe for service delivery and budget allocation.

Sector Analysis

The professional, scientific, and technical services sector is vast, encompassing a wide array of specialized support functions. Contracts within this sector often support government operations, research, and development. The market size for such services is substantial, with numerous firms competing for federal contracts. This particular contract for student services fits within the broader professional services niche, likely supporting educational outreach or administrative functions within the Department of the Interior.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information about subcontracting plans. The presence of 4 bidders suggests that both small and large businesses may have participated in the competition. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement and its impact on the broader small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the U.S. Geological Survey. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed performance monitoring and specific accountability measures are not publicly detailed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Student Support Services Programs
Professional and Technical Services Contracts
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
Department of the Interior Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics.
Ambiguous service description ('All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services').
Limited public information on contractor's past performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $7,752 to DREW JACKSON. STUDENT SERVICES CONTRACT - DREW JACKSON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DREW JACKSON.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (U.S. Geological Survey).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7,752.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2028-04-08.

What specific student services are being provided under this contract?

The contract identifies the service category as 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' (NAICS 541990) and is awarded to Drew Jackson. However, the specific nature of the 'student services' is not detailed in the provided data. This could range from administrative support, counseling, tutoring, career services, or specialized technical assistance for students involved in USGS-related programs or internships. Without a detailed statement of work, the exact services remain ambiguous, making it difficult to assess the contract's precise purpose and effectiveness.

How does the $7.75 million contract value compare to similar student services contracts within the federal government?

Comparing the $7.75 million value requires identifying contracts with similar scopes and durations. Given the broad service category, direct comparisons are difficult. However, for a two-year contract (730 days), this equates to approximately $3.875 million per year. This figure is moderate for professional services supporting a federal agency's student initiatives. Larger, more complex student support programs might involve higher values, while smaller, localized efforts could be less. The number of bidders (4) suggests the market deemed this a reasonably sized opportunity.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will success be measured?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or details on how the success of this student services contract will be measured. Typically, contracts of this nature would outline metrics related to service delivery, client satisfaction, program participation rates, or achievement of specific student outcomes. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it impossible to assess the contractor's performance or the overall effectiveness of the services being procured. This lack of detail is a potential risk indicator.

What is the track record of Drew Jackson in providing similar student services or professional technical services to the federal government?

Information regarding Drew Jackson's specific track record in providing student services or similar professional technical services to the federal government is not included in the provided data summary. To assess their capability and past performance, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or issues. A lack of readily available performance data could be a concern.

What is the historical spending pattern for student services or similar professional services by the U.S. Geological Survey?

The provided data does not offer historical spending patterns for student services or similar professional services by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). To analyze this, one would need to examine past contract awards by the USGS in NAICS code 541990 or related categories, looking at the total expenditure over several fiscal years. Understanding historical spending can reveal trends, identify potential increases or decreases in demand for such services, and provide context for the current $7.75 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 16 NICOLE DR, QUEENSBURY, NY, 12804

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $225,000

Exercised Options: $225,000

Current Obligation: $7,752

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline