Electrical services contract for Truxton Canon Agency awarded to Mohave Electric Cooperative for $180,000

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $180,000 ($180.0K)

Contractor: Mohave Electric Cooperative, Incorporated

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $495/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR TRUXTON CANON AGENCY

Place of Performance

Location: VALENTINE, MOHAVE County, ARIZONA, 86437

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $180,000 to MOHAVE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED for work described as: ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR TRUXTON CANON AGENCY Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the firm fixed-price structure and duration. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a sole-source award, potentially limiting price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the nature of electrical distribution services. 4. Performance context suggests a routine service requirement for agency operations. 5. Sector positioning is within essential utility services for federal facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $180,000 for a one-year period of performance seems aligned with typical utility service contracts of this nature. Benchmarking against similar electrical distribution contracts for federal agencies of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the firm fixed-price award type suggests that the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. The data indicates it was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION.' This suggests that Mohave Electric Cooperative was the only entity capable of providing the required electrical distribution services in the specified geographic area, likely due to existing infrastructure or service territory exclusivity. The lack of competition means there was no opportunity for multiple bidders to offer proposals, which could have led to a lower price.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. The government may not be achieving the best possible value when competition is absent.

Public Impact

The Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education will benefit from reliable electrical services. Essential electrical distribution and maintenance services will be delivered to the Truxton Canon Agency. The geographic impact is localized to the Truxton Canon Agency in Arizona. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving existing personnel from Mohave Electric Cooperative.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to suboptimal pricing.
Potential for vendor lock-in if no alternative providers exist in the region.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Award to an established cooperative likely ensures reliable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the utility services sector, specifically focusing on electric power distribution. The market for such services is often characterized by regulated monopolies or regional cooperatives due to the extensive infrastructure required. Federal agencies rely on these services to maintain operational continuity. Comparable spending benchmarks for electrical services can vary significantly based on location, infrastructure complexity, and the specific services required (e.g., distribution, maintenance, emergency response).

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature and the likely specialized infrastructure required for electrical distribution, it is improbable that small businesses would be primary subcontractors unless they provide very specific, niche services. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely negligible for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education, which are part of the Department of the Interior. Accountability measures would include adherence to the terms of the purchase order, service level agreements (if any), and prompt payment. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but the contract award itself should be publicly accessible through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

Federal Utility Services
Bureau of Indian Affairs Operations
Bureau of Indian Education Facilities Management
Department of the Interior Infrastructure Support

Risk Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized service.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $180,000 to MOHAVE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED. ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR TRUXTON CANON AGENCY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MOHAVE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $180,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the track record of Mohave Electric Cooperative in providing services to federal agencies?

Information regarding Mohave Electric Cooperative's specific track record with federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. However, as an established electric cooperative, it likely has a history of providing reliable utility services to its members and potentially other government entities within its service territory. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) could reveal past performance on federal contracts, including customer satisfaction ratings, past performance evaluations, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Understanding their experience with government regulations and reporting requirements would also be beneficial.

How does the $180,000 contract value compare to similar electrical services contracts?

The $180,000 value for a one-year firm fixed-price contract for electrical distribution services is a moderate amount. Without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., routine maintenance, emergency response, infrastructure upgrades) and the exact location and size of the Truxton Canon Agency's electrical needs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for basic electrical power distribution and maintenance for a single agency facility, this value appears within a reasonable range. Contracts for larger facilities, complex distribution networks, or those involving significant infrastructure work would naturally command higher values. Benchmarking against other sole-source or competitively awarded contracts for similar services in Arizona or neighboring states would provide a more robust comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source electrical services contract?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition. Without competing bids, Mohave Electric Cooperative may not have been incentivized to offer the lowest possible price. Another risk is vendor lock-in; if Mohave Electric Cooperative is the only provider capable of servicing the Truxton Canon Agency's electrical needs, the agency may be dependent on them for future contracts, potentially limiting negotiation leverage. Furthermore, while less likely with established utilities, there's always a residual risk of service disruptions or performance issues, though the firm fixed-price nature and the cooperative's likely vested interest in maintaining infrastructure mitigate this to some extent.

How effective is the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type in ensuring value for this electrical services contract?

The Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for routine services like electrical distribution, as it shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. This provides the government with cost certainty, meaning the total price will not exceed the agreed-upon amount, barring any contract modifications. For Mohave Electric Cooperative, this means they must manage their costs efficiently to maintain profitability. This structure encourages the contractor to perform the work within budget and schedule. The effectiveness is maximized when the scope of work is clearly defined and unlikely to change significantly, which is often the case for basic utility services.

What are the historical spending patterns for electrical services at the Truxton Canon Agency or similar Bureau of Indian Affairs facilities?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for electrical services at the Truxton Canon Agency or similar Bureau of Indian Affairs facilities. To assess this, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded for these services over several fiscal years. Key metrics to examine would include the total amount spent annually, the number of contracts awarded, the types of services procured (e.g., maintenance, new installations, emergency repairs), and whether these were competitively or sole-source awards. Understanding historical spending can help identify trends, potential cost savings opportunities, and whether current spending aligns with past expenditures, adjusted for inflation and scope changes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Utilities › Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution › Electric Power Distribution

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1999 ARENA DR, BULLHEAD CITY, AZ, 86442

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,000,000

Exercised Options: $400,000

Current Obligation: $180,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline