Commerce Department awards $2.67M firewall replacement contract to Thundercat Technology, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $267,330 ($267.3K)

Contractor: Thundercat Technology, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 182 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: FIREWALL REPLACEMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20230

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $267,330 to THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC for work described as: FIREWALL REPLACEMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting a pre-negotiated framework. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the government. 3. Competition was robust with 8 bidders, indicating potential for competitive pricing. 4. The contract duration is relatively short at 182 days. 5. This IT service falls under 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.67 million for a firewall replacement over approximately six months appears reasonable given the scope of IT infrastructure security. Benchmarking against similar federal firewall replacement contracts of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type is generally favorable for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 8 bidders participating. This level of competition is a positive indicator, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid, which typically drives more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The agency likely benefited from a robust marketplace for this IT service.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this firewall replacement ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied to offer the best price and solution.

Public Impact

The Department of Commerce will benefit from enhanced cybersecurity through the firewall replacement. Essential IT infrastructure security services will be delivered. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia. The contract supports the IT services sector workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Short contract duration may necessitate rapid deployment and potential for follow-on work.
  • Reliance on a BPA Call might limit flexibility if requirements evolve significantly beyond the original BPA scope.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition with 8 bidders suggests a healthy market and competitive pricing.
  • Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
  • The contract addresses a critical cybersecurity need for the Department of Commerce.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on network security hardware and services. The market for cybersecurity solutions is substantial and growing, driven by increasing cyber threats. Comparable spending benchmarks for firewall replacements vary widely based on scale, features, and vendor, but a $2.67 million award for a federal agency suggests a significant deployment.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This means the primary award went to a large business, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract is limited unless Thundercat Technology, LLC engages in subcontracting. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess broader small business implications.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a BPA Call, which typically operates under a pre-existing BPA with established terms and conditions, implying some level of prior oversight. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award provides cost accountability. Oversight would likely involve regular performance reviews, acceptance of deliverables, and adherence to the BPA's terms. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Commerce IT Modernization Initiatives
  • Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Programs
  • Network Infrastructure Upgrades

Risk Flags

  • Short contract duration may pose implementation risks.
  • Potential for integration issues with existing network infrastructure.
  • Reliance on BPA Call limits competition to BPA holders.

Tags

it-services, cybersecurity, firewall-replacement, department-of-commerce, district-of-columbia, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, large-business, information-technology, network-security, bpa-call

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $267,330 to THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC. FIREWALL REPLACEMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (Office of the Secretary).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $267,330.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is Thundercat Technology, LLC's track record with federal cybersecurity contracts?

Thundercat Technology, LLC has a history of securing federal contracts, including those related to IT services and cybersecurity. A review of federal procurement data indicates past awards for network equipment, software, and related support services across various agencies. While specific details on past firewall replacement projects are not immediately available from the provided summary, their general presence in the federal IT market suggests experience. Further investigation into their past performance ratings and specific cybersecurity project completions would offer a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in this domain.

How does the $2.67 million value compare to similar federal firewall replacement contracts?

The $2.67 million contract value for a firewall replacement over approximately six months is within a typical range for federal agencies requiring robust network security. However, direct comparisons are challenging without knowing the specific scope, number of firewalls, features, and complexity of the network environment. Contracts for large-scale enterprise-wide firewall deployments or upgrades with advanced threat prevention capabilities can easily exceed this amount. Conversely, smaller agency-specific or departmental replacements might cost less. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined scope, which aids in value assessment once that scope is fully understood.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Key risks include potential delays in deployment impacting network security continuity, integration challenges with existing infrastructure, and performance issues if the chosen firewall solution does not meet the Department of Commerce's specific security requirements. Given the short 182-day duration, the risk of incomplete or rushed implementation is also present. Ensuring adequate technical expertise from both the contractor and the government oversight team is crucial to mitigate these risks. Vendor lock-in or unexpected maintenance costs post-installation could also emerge as risks if not properly addressed in the contract terms.

How effective is a firm-fixed-price contract for cybersecurity hardware and services?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract is generally effective for cybersecurity hardware and services when the scope of work is clearly defined and well-understood. It provides cost certainty for the government, shifting the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. For a firewall replacement with specific hardware and installation requirements, FFP can be advantageous. However, if the scope is ambiguous or likely to change, FFP can lead to contractor resistance to necessary modifications or disputes. In such cases, other contract types like cost-plus-fixed-fee might be more appropriate, though they offer less cost certainty to the government.

What is the historical spending pattern for firewall replacements at the Department of Commerce?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for firewall replacements at the Department of Commerce requires access to detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. Without that specific dataset, it's difficult to establish a precise pattern. However, federal agencies typically undertake such replacements periodically, often driven by hardware end-of-life, evolving threat landscapes, or new security mandates. Spending can fluctuate significantly based on the scale of the upgrade (e.g., agency-wide vs. specific office), the chosen technology, and the competitive environment at the time of procurement. This $2.67 million award represents a significant investment for a single replacement cycle.

What are the implications of awarding via a BPA Call versus a direct solicitation?

Awarding via a BPA Call means that the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) was already established, likely through a prior competitive process. This streamlines the acquisition process for individual calls placed against the BPA, often resulting in faster delivery and potentially better pricing due to pre-negotiated terms. However, it also means the competition for this specific firewall replacement was limited to vendors who were part of the original BPA. If the BPA itself was competed broadly, then this call benefits from that initial wide competition. If the BPA had limited scope or participants, this call's competitive landscape is constrained by that.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Thundercat Technology LLC

Address: 11190 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 200, RESTON, VA, 20191

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $267,330

Exercised Options: $267,330

Current Obligation: $267,330

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1331L525A13OS0018

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-01

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

More Contracts from Thundercat Technology, LLC

View all Thundercat Technology, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending