DoD's $23.3M Tinker Support Services contract awarded to a joint venture shows strong performance
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,279,588 ($23.3M)
Contractor: Tinker Support Services JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-02-01
End Date: 2012-09-30
Contract Duration: 242 days
Daily Burn Rate: $96.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: STEAM PRODUCTION
Place of Performance
Location: TINKER AFB, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.3 million to TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV for work described as: STEAM PRODUCTION Key points: 1. The contract demonstrates a commitment to supporting critical Air Force operations through facilities maintenance. 2. Award to a joint venture suggests a strategy to leverage specialized capabilities and potentially foster new business relationships. 3. Performance has been rated 'OK', indicating satisfactory execution of services. 4. The contract duration of 242 days suggests a focused scope of work, likely for a specific project or period. 5. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 6. The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates a competitive process, though with specific source exclusions.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of $23.3 million for a 242-day period for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts requires more granular data on the specific services provided. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved, which is a positive indicator of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was open, certain sources were excluded from bidding. The number of bidders (6) suggests a moderate level of competition. The exclusion of sources might be due to specific technical requirements or prior relationships, which could potentially limit the full breadth of market competition and price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: While competition was present, the exclusion of certain sources means taxpayers may not have benefited from the lowest possible price that a truly unrestricted open competition might have yielded.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force personnel and operations at Tinker Air Force Base, who receive essential facilities support. Services delivered include facilities maintenance and support, ensuring operational readiness and a safe working environment. The geographic impact is localized to Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma. Workforce implications include employment for individuals within the joint venture, contributing to the local economy.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited price optimization due to exclusion of sources in the competition.
- Performance rated 'OK' suggests room for improvement towards 'excellent' or 'highly successful'.
Positive Signals
- Award to a joint venture can foster new business capabilities and partnerships.
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability.
- Successful completion of a competitive bid process.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of maintenance, operation, and support activities for government facilities. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending on base operations and infrastructure maintenance. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed against other large-scale facilities management contracts at major military installations.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee is a joint venture, which may or may not qualify as a small business depending on its structure and ownership. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the joint venture itself actively engages small businesses for subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. Performance is monitored through contract deliverables and inspections. Transparency is facilitated by contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support Services
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Department of Defense Infrastructure Support
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Performance rated 'OK' indicates potential for improvement.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, air-force, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, joint-venture, tinker-air-force-base, oklahoma, medium-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.3 million to TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV. STEAM PRODUCTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-02-01. End: 2012-09-30.
What specific facilities support services were included in this $23.3 million contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services). While specific line items are not detailed, this category typically encompasses a broad range of services including general maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, pest control, and potentially specialized support for building systems (HVAC, electrical, plumbing). The total award of $23.3 million over approximately 8 months suggests a comprehensive scope of services required to maintain a significant portion of Tinker Air Force Base's infrastructure.
How does the performance rating of 'OK' compare to other facilities support contracts?
A performance rating of 'OK' generally signifies that the contractor met the minimum requirements of the contract but did not exceed expectations. In the context of federal contracting, ratings often range from 'Exceptional' to 'Unsatisfactory'. 'OK' suggests satisfactory performance, meaning services were delivered as specified, but there may not have been outstanding quality, timeliness, or innovation. Compared to contracts rated 'Exceptional', this suggests less value-added beyond the basic contractual obligations. However, it is still considered acceptable performance, avoiding the issues associated with 'Marginal' or 'Unsatisfactory' ratings.
What are the implications of awarding to a joint venture for this contract?
Awarding to a joint venture, such as TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV, can have several implications. It often allows the government to leverage the combined expertise and resources of multiple companies that might not individually possess all the required capabilities or capacity. For the contractors, it provides an opportunity to enter new markets, share risks, and build a track record. From a government perspective, it can foster competition and potentially lead to innovative solutions by bringing diverse perspectives. However, it can also introduce complexities in management, communication, and accountability if not structured and overseen effectively.
What does 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' mean for cost-effectiveness?
This procurement method signifies that the solicitation was broadly advertised, but specific sources were intentionally excluded from bidding. This exclusion could be based on factors like security clearances, specific technical certifications, or prior performance issues with certain entities. While it aims to ensure qualified bidders participate, the exclusion of potential competitors can limit the overall competitive pressure. Consequently, the government might not achieve the absolute lowest price achievable in a completely unrestricted open competition, potentially impacting cost-effectiveness for taxpayers.
What is the typical duration for facilities support contracts of this magnitude?
Facilities support contracts can vary significantly in duration, from short-term projects to multi-year base operations support. A duration of 242 days (approximately 8 months) for a $23.3 million contract suggests a focused scope, possibly addressing a specific need, a transition period, or a defined project phase rather than a comprehensive, long-term base support requirement. Longer-term contracts (multiple years) are more common for full base operations, often including options for extension. This shorter duration might indicate a specific, time-bound requirement or a bridge contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA810106R0012
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 601, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,279,588
Exercised Options: $23,279,588
Current Obligation: $23,279,588
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA810108D0006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-02-01
Current End Date: 2012-09-30
Potential End Date: 2012-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-04-05
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)