Agriculture awards $134K contract for warehouse addition design services to The Johnson-McAdams Firm

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $134,214 ($134.2K)

Contractor: THE Johnson-Mcadams Firm, P.A.

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2025-09-10

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 293 days

Daily Burn Rate: $458/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGNER-OF-RECORD SERVICES FOR BUILDING 1392 WAREHOUSE ADDITION CONSTRUCTION

Place of Performance

Location: GREENWOOD, LEFLORE County, MISSISSIPPI, 38930

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $134,213.86 to THE JOHNSON-MCADAMS FIRM, P.A. for work described as: DESIGNER-OF-RECORD SERVICES FOR BUILDING 1392 WAREHOUSE ADDITION CONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded for design services, not construction, indicating a focus on early-stage project planning. 2. The contract duration of 293 days suggests a comprehensive design phase for the warehouse addition. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The small value of the contract may indicate a smaller scope or a component of a larger project. 6. The specific NAICS code (541330) points to engineering services, aligning with design requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $134,213.86 for design services appears reasonable for a warehouse addition project. Benchmarking against similar 'Designer of Record' contracts for construction projects of this scale would provide further context. However, given the fixed-price nature and the specific engineering services required, the pricing is likely competitive. The value is assessed as good, assuming the scope of work aligns with typical design requirements for such an addition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of a competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives proposals from a range of qualified firms. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces and ensures the government selects the most capable and cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), which will receive updated warehouse facilities. The services delivered include the design and engineering plans necessary for the construction of a warehouse addition. The geographic impact is localized to the facility where the warehouse addition will be constructed in Mississippi. The contract supports the architecture and engineering services sector, potentially involving architects, engineers, and drafters.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits the assessment of the true competitive landscape.
The contract value is relatively small, raising questions about whether it represents a complete project or a smaller component.
Potential for scope creep if the initial design requirements are not clearly defined.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent process.
Fixed-price contract type helps control costs.
The contractor, The Johnson-McAdams Firm, P.A., is likely experienced in engineering services given the NAICS code.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is a critical component of the construction industry. This sector involves providing specialized design and technical expertise for various infrastructure and building projects. The market for engineering services is competitive, with numerous firms offering a range of capabilities. This specific contract for a warehouse addition design is a typical procurement within this sector, supporting government infrastructure needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is minimal, as the prime contract was awarded to a firm that is not explicitly identified as a small business, and no specific small business utilization requirements are mentioned.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Agriculture's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified design services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being made under full and open competition, with details likely available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Design and Construction
Government Warehouse and Storage Facilities
Engineering and Architectural Services Procurement
Department of Agriculture Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if design requirements are not clearly defined.
Contractor performance risk (quality and timeliness of design).
Limited visibility into the number of competitors in the full and open competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $134,213.86 to THE JOHNSON-MCADAMS FIRM, P.A.. DESIGNER-OF-RECORD SERVICES FOR BUILDING 1392 WAREHOUSE ADDITION CONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE JOHNSON-MCADAMS FIRM, P.A..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $134,213.86.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-10. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of The Johnson-McAdams Firm, P.A. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Agriculture?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess The Johnson-McAdams Firm, P.A.'s track record. Without specific data on past performance, it's difficult to ascertain their experience with federal contracts. However, their selection for this contract suggests they met the minimum qualifications and demonstrated capability in engineering services. Further investigation into their past federal awards, performance reviews, and any past issues or commendations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and expertise in serving government clients.

How does the awarded amount of $134,213.86 compare to similar 'Designer of Record' contracts for warehouse additions?

Benchmarking this contract's value requires access to a database of similar federal procurements. Generally, $134,213.86 for design services for a warehouse addition is a moderate amount, suggesting a project of modest scale or complexity. Factors influencing this value include the size of the addition, the specific engineering requirements (e.g., structural, mechanical, electrical), and the geographic location impacting labor and material costs for design. Comparing it to contracts for similar-sized additions or facilities within the Department of Agriculture or other agencies would provide a clearer picture of its value-for-money.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep, where the design requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, and contractor performance issues, such as delays or quality deficiencies in the design. Mitigation strategies include the fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to adhere to the budget, and the full and open competition process, which aims to select a capable firm. Clear definition of the Statement of Work (SOW) and robust oversight by the contracting officer are crucial for managing scope and ensuring quality. The relatively short duration also limits the window for significant delays.

What is the expected effectiveness of the completed warehouse addition, and how will its success be measured?

The effectiveness of the warehouse addition will be measured by its ability to meet the operational needs of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), such as providing adequate storage space, maintaining appropriate environmental conditions, and facilitating efficient logistics. Success will likely be determined by the facility's timely completion according to the design specifications, its operational readiness, and its contribution to APHIS's mission. Post-occupancy evaluations or user feedback from APHIS personnel would provide further insights into its effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for engineering services within the Department of Agriculture for similar projects?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for engineering services within the Department of Agriculture for similar projects would require a deep dive into federal procurement databases like FPDS or USASpending. This would involve filtering for NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) and keywords related to 'warehouse,' 'addition,' or 'construction design' within the USDA. Such an analysis could reveal average contract values, typical competition levels, and the frequency of such procurements, providing context for the current award's size and terms.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 108 W MARKET ST, GREENWOOD, MS, 38930

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $134,214

Exercised Options: $134,214

Current Obligation: $134,214

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 12639521D0053

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline