Forest Service awards $4.19M contract for Lake Day Use Improvements in Montana to Green Wing Excavation LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $41,929 ($41.9K)

Contractor: Green Wing Excavation LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-13

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 170 days

Daily Burn Rate: $247/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 24

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: HLCNF GAOA GIPSY LAKE DAY USE IMPROVEMENTS AWARD: BASE BID (SITE 1) + OPTION 1 (SITE 2) + OPTION 2 (SITE 3)

Place of Performance

Location: TOWNSEND, BROADWATER County, MONTANA, 59644

State: Montana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $41,929 to GREEN WING EXCAVATION LLC for work described as: HLCNF GAOA GIPSY LAKE DAY USE IMPROVEMENTS AWARD: BASE BID (SITE 1) + OPTION 1 (SITE 2) + OPTION 2 (SITE 3) Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single small business, indicating potential for focused expertise. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 3. Project duration of 170 days is relatively short, implying a focused scope of work. 4. The contract is for 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction,' a broad category. 5. Geographic focus on Montana may indicate regional infrastructure priorities. 6. The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting a focus on smaller value procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $4.19 million for civil engineering construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this nature, though specific benchmarks are difficult without detailed scope. The firm fixed price structure provides cost predictability. However, without more granular data on the specific improvements and comparable projects, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The award to a single entity suggests a competitive process that resulted in one acceptable offer.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a less extensive competition than full and open procedures. While 24 offers were received, the specific details of the solicitation and evaluation process are not provided. The number of offers suggests a degree of interest, but the SAP framework may limit the pool of potential bidders compared to larger, more complex procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP for this contract likely streamlined the acquisition process, potentially leading to faster award. However, it may not have achieved the same level of price competition as a full and open solicitation, which could impact taxpayer savings.

Public Impact

Benefits the public by improving day-use facilities at Lake properties managed by the Forest Service. Enhances recreational opportunities and visitor experience in Montana. Supports local employment through construction activities in the region. Contributes to the maintenance and upgrade of federal infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep given the broad category of 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction'.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant portion of the work.
Limited transparency on the specific technical requirements and evaluation criteria under SAP.

Positive Signals

Award to a single, presumably small business, contractor.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Relatively short performance period suggests a well-defined project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector, which encompasses a wide range of infrastructure projects. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking civil works. The Forest Service, as part of the Department of Agriculture, regularly procures construction services for land management and facility maintenance. Benchmarking this specific award is difficult without knowing the precise nature of the 'Day Use Improvements,' but it represents a typical investment in public land infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Green Wing Excavation LLC, which is likely a small business given the context of SAP. While the contract itself is not a small business set-aside, the award to a small business is a positive signal for the small business ecosystem. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements, but it is common for prime contractors to utilize small businesses for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Forest Service contracting officer and project managers. The firm fixed price contract provides a degree of financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, but detailed project-specific oversight mechanisms are not specified in the provided data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

National Forest System Infrastructure Projects
Recreation Facility Modernization
Public Lands Management Contracts
Civil Engineering Services

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Limited competition under SAP
Contractor performance unknown

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $41,929 to GREEN WING EXCAVATION LLC. HLCNF GAOA GIPSY LAKE DAY USE IMPROVEMENTS AWARD: BASE BID (SITE 1) + OPTION 1 (SITE 2) + OPTION 2 (SITE 3)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GREEN WING EXCAVATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $41,929.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-13. End: 2026-09-30.

What specific 'Day Use Improvements' are included in this contract, and how do they align with Forest Service recreational goals?

The provided data does not detail the specific 'Day Use Improvements.' However, typical projects under this category for the Forest Service often include upgrades to picnic areas, restrooms, trailheads, parking lots, and access roads within designated day-use areas of national forests. These improvements are intended to enhance visitor safety, accessibility, and overall experience, thereby supporting the Forest Service's mission to manage and protect national forests for public enjoyment and conservation. Further details would be available in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).

How does the $4.19 million award compare to similar Forest Service contracts for recreational facility upgrades in Montana?

Comparing this $4.19 million award requires access to a database of similar Forest Service contracts specifically for recreational facility upgrades in Montana. Without such a benchmark, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value. Factors influencing cost include the scope of work (e.g., new construction vs. renovation), specific site conditions, materials used, and prevailing labor rates in the region. The fact that it was competed under SAP suggests it might be on the smaller to mid-range side for significant infrastructure work, but the final price is driven by the detailed SOW.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks include potential cost overruns if the scope is not precisely defined (though mitigated by the Firm Fixed Price structure), delays due to unforeseen site conditions or weather (mitigated by the contract duration and potential for schedule adjustments), and performance issues with the contractor (mitigated by Forest Service oversight and contract clauses for default or non-performance). Given the award to a single entity, there's also a risk related to the contractor's capacity, which is typically assessed during the procurement process. The relatively short duration may also indicate a focus on minimizing schedule-related risks.

What is the track record of Green Wing Excavation LLC in performing similar civil engineering construction contracts for federal agencies?

Information on Green Wing Excavation LLC's specific track record is not provided in the data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contract awards, and any history of disputes or litigation. Federal agencies typically consider past performance as a significant factor in award decisions, especially under competitive procurements. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and expertise for this specific project.

How has Forest Service spending on 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' in Montana trended over the past five years?

Analyzing the trend of Forest Service spending on 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' in Montana over the past five years would require accessing historical federal procurement data. This type of analysis could reveal whether this $4.19 million award is part of an increasing, decreasing, or stable spending pattern for such services in the state. Factors influencing trends could include congressional appropriations, national priorities for infrastructure investment, and specific needs identified within Montana's national forests. This single award provides limited insight into broader spending patterns.

What is the significance of the contract being awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP)?

Awarding under SAP signifies that the contract value likely fell within the thresholds defined for simplified acquisitions (typically under $250,000, though higher thresholds exist for certain categories and agencies). However, the provided data shows an award of $4.19 million, which exceeds the standard SAP threshold. This suggests either a specific exception applies (e.g., construction services may have higher SAP thresholds), or the 'SAP' designation might refer to a specific agency's internal process for competitive bidding below certain thresholds, or there might be an error in the provided data point. Generally, SAP aims to reduce administrative burden and expedite the award process for smaller value procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 1240LU26Q0028

Offers Received: 24

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 70 NEZ PERCE TRL, TOWNSEND, MT, 59644

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,929

Exercised Options: $41,929

Current Obligation: $41,929

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline