USDA Forest Service Awards $1.13M for Lyon and Taylor Trail Bridge Reconstruction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,133,123 ($1.1M)

Contractor: Eagle EYE Electric LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-15

End Date: 2027-10-01

Contract Duration: 534 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PROJECT NAME: LYON AND TAYLOR TRAIL BRIDGE AND TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99501

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $1.1 million to EAGLE EYE ELECTRIC LLC for work described as: PROJECT NAME: LYON AND TAYLOR TRAIL BRIDGE AND TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. The contract focuses on construction and infrastructure, a sector with significant federal investment. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate procurement strategy. 3. The firm fixed price contract type aims to control costs for this reconstruction project. 4. Project duration is 534 days, indicating a substantial scope of work.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $1.13M for bridge and trail reconstruction appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar infrastructure projects would provide a clearer assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The procurement utilized 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies a competitive process was initiated but specific sources were excluded. This method can impact price discovery if the exclusion criteria were overly restrictive.

Taxpayer Impact: The firm fixed price contract aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by setting a clear cost ceiling for the project.

Public Impact

Reconstruction of the Lyon and Taylor Trail Bridge and Trail will improve recreational access and safety for the public. The project is located in Alaska, potentially impacting local employment and businesses. Improved trail infrastructure can boost tourism and economic activity in the surrounding area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise during reconstruction.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants further review to ensure maximum competition.
Project timeline could be impacted by Alaska's challenging weather conditions.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Project aims to enhance public recreational infrastructure.
Full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally promotes better pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, often driven by infrastructure needs, facility upgrades, and maintenance across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific requirement or outcome for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Agriculture's Forest Service is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight procedures for construction projects, including site inspections and progress monitoring, should be in place to ensure quality and adherence to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Agriculture Contracting
Forest Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost increases due to Alaska's challenging environment.
Limited transparency on the 'exclusion of sources' rationale.
Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
Project duration is substantial, increasing exposure to market fluctuations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $1.1 million to EAGLE EYE ELECTRIC LLC. PROJECT NAME: LYON AND TAYLOR TRAIL BRIDGE AND TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EAGLE EYE ELECTRIC LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-15. End: 2027-10-01.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method, and did this exclusion limit competitive pricing?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements are necessary, and only a limited number of contractors can meet them. While intended to ensure project success, such exclusions can inadvertently reduce competition, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly unrestricted open competition. A review of the solicitation documents would clarify the rationale for exclusion and its potential impact on the final award price.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this reconstruction project, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure effectiveness and value for taxpayer money?

Key performance indicators for this project would likely include adherence to the construction schedule, quality of materials and workmanship, safety compliance, and successful completion of all specified bridge and trail elements. Effectiveness will be measured by the post-reconstruction usability, durability, and safety of the infrastructure. The Forest Service should have a robust inspection and acceptance process to verify these KPIs and ensure the project delivers the intended value.

Given the project's location in Alaska and its 534-day duration, what risk mitigation strategies are in place to address potential delays due to weather, logistics, or unforeseen site conditions?

Mitigation strategies for projects in Alaska often include building weather contingency days into the schedule, securing necessary permits well in advance, and establishing robust supply chain and logistics plans. For unforeseen site conditions, contract clauses may allow for equitable adjustments to time and cost if conditions differ materially from those anticipated. Proactive site investigations and detailed planning are crucial to minimize these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 1240BJ26Q0002

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Bering Straits Native Corporation

Address: 5540 TECH CENTER DR, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 80919

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,133,123

Exercised Options: $1,133,123

Current Obligation: $1,133,123

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140F0822D0038

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline