Agriculture Department awards $10.8M for forestry support, with Omalley Brothers Corp as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,002,269 ($11.0M)

Contractor: Omalley Brothers Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2024-09-23

End Date: 2027-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,194 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RIVBULIO LOW ELEVATION IRSC -12363N24C4012 $6,137,508.00 MEMALOOSE/HILLOCKBURN PROJECT AREA TOTAL $4,686,896.00 FISH CREEK PROJECT AREA TOTAL $10,824,404.00 TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE COR: ALEXIS GUNSOLUS (ALEXIS.GUNSOLUS@USDA.GOV) PERFORMANCE PE

Place of Performance

Location: SANDY, CLACKAMAS County, OREGON, 97055

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $11.0 million to OMALLEY BROTHERS CORP for work described as: RIVBULIO LOW ELEVATION IRSC -12363N24C4012 $6,137,508.00 MEMALOOSE/HILLOCKBURN PROJECT AREA TOTAL $4,686,896.00 FISH CREEK PROJECT AREA TOTAL $10,824,404.00 TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE COR: ALEXIS GUNSOLUS (ALEXIS.GUNSOLUS@USDA.GOV) PERFORMANCE PE Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.8 million for forestry support activities. 2. Performance period spans from September 2024 to December 2027. 3. Awarded through full and open competition, indicating broad market participation. 4. Prime contractor is Omalley Brothers Corp. 5. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 6. Project areas include Rivbulio Low Elevation, Memaloose/Hillockburn, and Fish Creek. 7. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value of $10.8 million for forestry support activities appears to be a significant investment. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for forestry management and support services would be necessary to determine value for money. The firm fixed price structure suggests that cost overruns are the contractor's responsibility, which can be a positive indicator for cost control. However, without specific details on the services rendered and comparable contract data, a definitive assessment of value is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 5 bidders (indicated by 'no': 5) indicates a reasonable level of competition for this forestry support contract. This competitive process is generally expected to drive more favorable pricing and ensure a wider pool of qualified contractors is evaluated.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at a fair market price and reduces the risk of overpayment.

Public Impact

Benefits federal land management agencies, specifically the Forest Service, by providing essential support activities. Services delivered are related to forestry support, likely encompassing areas like forest health, maintenance, or restoration. Geographic impact is concentrated in Oregon, with specific project areas mentioned: Rivbulio Low Elevation, Memaloose/Hillockburn, and Fish Creek. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for individuals with forestry and related skills, both within the prime contractor and potentially subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the forestry support.
The broad nature of 'Support Activities for Forestry' could lead to scope creep if not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single prime contractor for multiple project areas might present risks if the contractor faces performance issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm fixed price contract type helps to control costs and provides budget certainty.
Long performance period (over 3 years) allows for sustained support and project continuity.

Sector Analysis

The forestry sector within the federal government, particularly under the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service, involves significant spending on land management, conservation, and resource utilization. This contract for 'Support Activities for Forestry' fits within this broader sector, which encompasses services ranging from timber management and fire suppression to ecological restoration and research. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for similar forestry services awarded by federal agencies, considering factors like geographic scope, duration, and specific service requirements.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates 'sb' is false. This means that large businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win the award. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though it suggests opportunities may lie in subcontracting roles rather than prime contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, where the contractor is responsible for delivering specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reporting may be internal. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Agriculture would have jurisdiction for investigating fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Forest Management Services
Environmental Support Contracts
Natural Resource Conservation Programs
Federal Land Management Support
Forestry Research and Development

Risk Flags

Potential for environmental challenges impacting project timelines or costs.
Contractor performance risk due to reliance on expertise and execution.
Risk of changes in regulatory requirements or unforeseen ecological conditions over the contract duration.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals may limit broader economic impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $11.0 million to OMALLEY BROTHERS CORP. RIVBULIO LOW ELEVATION IRSC -12363N24C4012 $6,137,508.00 MEMALOOSE/HILLOCKBURN PROJECT AREA TOTAL $4,686,896.00 FISH CREEK PROJECT AREA TOTAL $10,824,404.00 TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE COR: ALEXIS GUNSOLUS (ALEXIS.GUNSOLUS@USDA.GOV) PERFORMANCE PE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OMALLEY BROTHERS CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-23. End: 2027-12-31.

What is the track record of Omalley Brothers Corp with the Department of Agriculture or similar federal agencies?

Information regarding Omalley Brothers Corp's specific track record with the Department of Agriculture or other federal agencies is not directly provided in the data. To assess their reliability and past performance, a review of their contract history, including past performance evaluations, any disputes or claims, and successful completion of similar projects would be necessary. Federal procurement databases and past performance information systems are typically used for such assessments. A contractor's history of delivering on time, within budget, and to the required quality standards is a key indicator of future performance.

How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks?

The provided data does not include specific details on the 'per-unit' costs of services rendered under this contract, nor does it break down the $10.8 million total into granular service components. Therefore, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks for specific forestry support activities is not possible with the current information. To perform such an analysis, one would need a detailed breakdown of the contract's line items and the quantities or units associated with each service. This would then be compared against established cost-estimating guides, market research reports, or pricing data from similar, recently awarded federal contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with this forestry support contract?

Key risks for this contract include potential environmental challenges in the specified project areas (Rivbulio Low Elevation, Memaloose/Hillockburn, Fish Creek) which could impact timelines or costs, despite the firm fixed price. Performance risk is also present, as the success of forestry support relies heavily on the contractor's expertise and execution. Furthermore, the duration of the contract (nearly four years) increases the exposure to potential changes in regulatory requirements or unforeseen ecological conditions. Finally, the lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals might represent a missed opportunity for broader economic impact and could indicate a less diversified approach to project execution.

How effective is the Forest Service in managing contracts of this nature and scale?

The effectiveness of the Forest Service in managing contracts of this nature and scale can be inferred from its long history of managing complex land management and support service contracts. The agency typically employs contracting officers and technical experts to oversee such awards. However, the specific effectiveness for this particular contract would depend on the diligence of the assigned contracting officer's representative (COR), the clarity of the statement of work, and the established performance monitoring mechanisms. Historical data on contract close-outs, disputes, and successful project completions within the Forest Service would provide a more robust assessment of their general management capabilities.

What has been the historical spending trend for 'Support Activities for Forestry' by the Forest Service?

The provided data snippet focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending trends for 'Support Activities for Forestry.' To determine this, one would need to access historical federal procurement data, such as from USASpending.gov or FPDS, and aggregate spending on the specific Product Service Code (PSC) or North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code associated with 'Support Activities for Forestry' over several fiscal years. Analyzing this trend would reveal whether spending in this category is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, providing context for the current $10.8 million award.

Are there any specific performance metrics or deliverables outlined in the contract that can be used to gauge success?

The provided data summary does not include specific performance metrics or deliverables for this contract. While it states the contract is for 'Support Activities for Forestry' and has a firm fixed price, the details of what constitutes successful completion (e.g., acres treated, specific ecological improvements, reporting requirements) are not present. Typically, a contract of this nature would have a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) with measurable outcomes, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and key performance indicators (KPIs) that the COR would monitor. Without access to the full contract document, assessing success is limited to the general understanding of forestry support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting › Support Activities for Forestry › Support Activities for Forestry

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVERVAT SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 12363N24R4018

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7842 SE 282ND AVE, GRESHAM, OR, 97080

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,002,269

Exercised Options: $11,002,269

Current Obligation: $11,002,269

Actual Outlays: $3,581,923

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline