Forest Service awards $32K contract for aircraft parts overhaul, with delivery expected within two months

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,017 ($32.0K)

Contractor: Mhd-Rockland Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-02-20

End Date: 2026-04-20

Contract Duration: 59 days

Daily Burn Rate: $543/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 0460 SERV N141Z PROP OVERHAULS 1202SA23T9502 PLEASE ASSIGN TO CO ROBERT PFEIL

Place of Performance

Location: CROFTON, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21114

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $32,017.38 to MHD-ROCKLAND INC. for work described as: 0460 SERV N141Z PROP OVERHAULS 1202SA23T9502 PLEASE ASSIGN TO CO ROBERT PFEIL Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are not detailed, impacting price discovery assessment. 3. Performance risk appears low given the short duration and fixed-price nature. 4. This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts' manufacturing NAICS code. 5. The contract is a delivery order, indicating it's part of a larger basic ordering agreement or indefinite-delivery contract. 6. The short performance period suggests a need for timely completion of aircraft maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $32,017.38 is modest. Without more information on the specific parts or services required, it is difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The fixed-price nature provides some cost certainty, but the overall value-for-money assessment is limited by the lack of detailed scope and competitive bidding information. The price appears reasonable for a specialized aircraft parts overhaul, but a definitive assessment requires more context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a less formal competition process than full and open competition. The number of bidders and the specific solicitation method are not provided. SAP is generally used for purchases below a certain dollar threshold, and while it aims for competition, the level of engagement can vary significantly. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the competition in driving down costs.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, the use of SAP suggests an attempt to streamline procurement for smaller value items. However, without clear competition data, it's uncertain if the best possible prices were secured.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Forest Service's aviation assets, ensuring operational readiness. The services delivered involve the overhaul of aircraft parts, crucial for maintaining safety and performance. The geographic impact is primarily tied to the location of the Forest Service's aviation operations. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving specialized technicians at the contractor's facility.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition information hinders assessment of price discovery.
Scope of 'prop overhauls' is vague, making it hard to evaluate the specific value provided.
The contract is a delivery order, suggesting potential for follow-on work or a larger underlying agreement not fully detailed here.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Short performance period (59 days) indicates a focus on timely execution.
Contract awarded to MHD-ROCKLAND INC., a known entity in the aerospace sector.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace manufacturing and maintenance sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts. The NAICS code 336413 covers 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing.' The market for aircraft parts overhaul is specialized, requiring specific certifications and expertise. The contract value is small relative to the overall aerospace industry, suggesting it addresses a niche requirement for the Forest Service's fleet.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false, meaning this was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses detailed in this record. The prime contractor, MHD-ROCKLAND INC., is likely a larger entity, and the impact on the broader small business ecosystem for aircraft parts is not directly evident from this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Forest Service's contracting officer and program managers. As a delivery order under SAP, the oversight might be less intensive than for larger, sole-source contracts. Accountability is primarily driven by the fixed-price terms and the delivery schedule. Transparency is limited by the information available through public contract databases, especially regarding the specifics of the SAP competition.

Related Government Programs

Forest Service Aviation Management
Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Contracts
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations
Department of Agriculture Procurement

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed competition information
Vague contract description ('prop overhauls')
Potential for limited price discovery due to SAP

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $32,017.38 to MHD-ROCKLAND INC.. 0460 SERV N141Z PROP OVERHAULS 1202SA23T9502 PLEASE ASSIGN TO CO ROBERT PFEIL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MHD-ROCKLAND INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32,017.38.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-02-20. End: 2026-04-20.

What specific aircraft parts are being overhauled under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact aircraft parts undergoing overhaul. The description 'PROP OVERHAULS' suggests work related to propellers, but this is not definitive. A detailed scope of work would typically be found in the contract's statement of work, which is not included in this summary. Understanding the specific parts is crucial for assessing the technical complexity, potential risks, and the true value of the service provided. Without this detail, comparisons to other contracts are generalized.

How does the $32,017.38 contract value compare to typical aircraft parts overhaul costs for the Forest Service?

Benchmarking this $32,017.38 contract value against typical Forest Service aircraft parts overhaul costs is challenging without more specific data. The value is relatively low, suggesting either a minor overhaul, a single component, or a contract for a smaller aircraft type. Larger overhauls, such as for engines or entire airframes, would cost significantly more. The Forest Service operates a diverse fleet, and costs vary widely based on the type of aircraft, the specific component, and the extent of the required work. This contract likely represents a small, specific maintenance task within a larger aviation program budget.

What is the track record of MHD-ROCKLAND INC. with federal contracts, particularly with the Forest Service or Department of Agriculture?

MHD-ROCKLAND INC. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily within the aerospace and defense sectors. While this specific award is for the Forest Service (part of the Department of Agriculture), their broader federal contracting history would need to be examined to assess their overall performance, reliability, and experience with government requirements. A review of past performance evaluations, contract modifications, and any disputes or terminations would provide a clearer picture of their track record. Without access to detailed contract performance data, it's assumed they meet the basic requirements for this award.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, given its short duration and fixed-price nature?

The primary risks associated with this short-duration, fixed-price contract are relatively low but could include delays in delivery if unforeseen issues arise during the overhaul process, potentially impacting the Forest Service's operational readiness. Contractor performance risk is somewhat mitigated by the fixed-price structure, which incentivizes efficiency. However, if the scope of 'prop overhauls' is underestimated by the contractor, they might incur losses, potentially leading to quality compromises or a desire to cut corners, though the short timeframe makes significant quality degradation less likely. The Forest Service's risk is mainly tied to the timely return of operational aircraft.

How does the use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) impact the transparency and competitiveness of this contract?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for smaller purchases (typically under $250,000) to streamline the procurement process. While SAP aims to encourage competition, it often involves less formal solicitation methods, such as posting on agency websites or using GSA schedules, compared to full and open competition. This can lead to fewer bidders and potentially less price transparency. For this $32,017.38 contract, the use of SAP suggests the agency sought efficiency. However, the lack of specific details on the number of offers received or the solicitation method makes it difficult to definitively assess the level of competition and its impact on achieving the best value for taxpayers.

What is the historical spending pattern for aircraft parts overhaul by the Forest Service?

Historical spending patterns for aircraft parts overhaul by the Forest Service would reveal trends in procurement volume, average contract values, and key contractors. This specific $32,017.38 contract is a small component of potentially much larger annual expenditures on aviation maintenance. Analyzing past years' spending data would show if this type of contract is recurring, if spending has increased or decreased, and how it aligns with the agency's overall fleet management strategy. Such analysis requires access to historical contract databases and budget information beyond this single award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2111 BALDWIN AVE, CROFTON, MD, 21114

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,017

Exercised Options: $32,017

Current Obligation: $32,017

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1202SA23T9502

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline