DoD's $17.2M IT services contract awarded to IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for Florida operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,191,374 ($17.2M)

Contractor: Igov Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-03-23

End Date: 2011-03-23

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $47.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: PROVISIONING - FFP

Place of Performance

Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33619

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.2 million to IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: PROVISIONING - FFP Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 365 days is standard for IT service provisions. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to specialized computer services. 5. Awarded by U.S. Special Operations Command, highlighting a focus on critical national security needs. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order (DO), suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle or a specific task order.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $17.2 million contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data. However, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure provides cost certainty. The contract's value relative to the services delivered would depend on the complexity and criticality of the 'Other Computer Related Services' provided to U.S. Special Operations Command. Further analysis would require understanding the scope of work and comparing it to industry standards for similar IT support in a high-security environment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 2 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific award. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing value and innovation, the number of bidders can influence price discovery. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it generally drives down costs through market forces. Even with two bidders, the process ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, promoting a more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The U.S. Special Operations Command benefits from specialized IT services crucial for its operations. Personnel within SOCOM likely receive enhanced IT support, potentially improving operational effectiveness. The contract's geographic focus on Florida suggests support for specific SOCOM facilities or activities in that state. The IT services provided could support a range of functions, from network maintenance to cybersecurity, impacting the daily work of military and civilian personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value for money.
  • The specific nature of 'Other Computer Related Services' is broad and could encompass a wide range of support, making precise cost comparison difficult.
  • Limited competition (2 bidders) might have constrained the potential for further cost savings.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
  • Awarded under full and open competition, adhering to best practices for procurement.
  • Contract supports a critical national security agency (U.S. Special Operations Command).

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is a vast and dynamic market. This contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519), which can include a wide array of IT support, consulting, and integration services. The U.S. Special Operations Command's need for such services highlights the critical role IT plays in modern defense operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within IT service contracts awarded to defense agencies, with prices varying significantly based on service complexity, security requirements, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. The award to IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. suggests it is not a small business itself, or if it is, it did not compete under a small business set-aside. Without further information on subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific contract is unclear, though larger prime contractors often engage small businesses for specialized IT support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's established procurement regulations and the U.S. Special Operations Command's internal oversight mechanisms. As a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary oversight focus would be on ensuring the contractor delivers the agreed-upon services within the specified timeframe and meets performance standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details might be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense IT Services Contracts
  • U.S. Special Operations Command Support Contracts
  • IT Services for National Security Agencies
  • Firm Fixed Price IT Contracts
  • Computer Related Services Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
  • Dependence on contractor performance for critical IT functions.
  • Cybersecurity risks inherent in IT service provision.

Tags

it-services, department-of-defense, u.s.-special-operations-command, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, florida, computer-related-services, delivery-order, naics-541519

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.2 million to IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. PROVISIONING - FFP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-03-23. End: 2011-03-23.

What is the specific scope of 'Other Computer Related Services' provided under this contract?

The specific scope of 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519) under this contract is not detailed in the provided data. This NAICS code is broad and can encompass a wide range of IT support, including but not limited to network administration, system integration, IT consulting, cybersecurity services, software maintenance, and hardware support. For the U.S. Special Operations Command, these services likely relate to maintaining and enhancing critical IT infrastructure that supports sensitive and high-stakes operations. A detailed statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS) associated with the contract would be necessary to understand the precise services rendered, their criticality, and the expected performance standards.

How does the $17.2 million value compare to similar IT service contracts for Special Operations Command?

Comparing the $17.2 million value of this contract to similar IT service contracts for the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) requires access to a broader dataset of SOCOM's IT procurements. Without specific benchmarks for comparable services (e.g., network management, cybersecurity, system integration) within SOCOM, it's difficult to definitively assess if this contract represents a high, low, or average expenditure. Factors such as contract duration (365 days), service complexity, security requirements, and the specific technologies involved would heavily influence pricing. Generally, IT services for specialized military units like SOCOM can command premium pricing due to stringent security and operational demands.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. For a firm-fixed-price IT services contract, typical KPIs might include system uptime percentages, response times for technical support requests, successful completion of cybersecurity audits, project milestones met on time, and adherence to security protocols. The success of the contract would be measured against the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). The U.S. Special Operations Command would have internal metrics and potentially contract-specific deliverables to evaluate IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s performance and ensure the services meet operational needs.

What is the track record of IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?

IGOV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has a history of federal contracting, as evidenced by this award from the Department of Defense (DoD). To assess their track record thoroughly, one would need to examine their complete contract history, including past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or terminations, and the types and values of previous awards. Information available through federal procurement data systems (like SAM.gov or FPDS) can provide insights into their experience with various agencies, contract types (FFP, T&M, etc.), and performance ratings. A positive track record with the DoD, especially with demanding components like SOCOM, would suggest reliability and competence in delivering IT services.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Potential risks for this IT services contract include service disruptions, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, cost overruns (less likely with FFP but possible through scope creep or change orders), and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight, clearly defined service level agreements (SLAs) within the PWS, regular performance reviews, and adherence to strict security protocols mandated by the DoD and SOCOM. The firm-fixed-price nature helps mitigate financial risk for the government, but ensuring the contractor has the necessary expertise and resources to meet demanding operational requirements is crucial. Background checks for personnel and compliance with security standards are also key risk mitigation measures.

How does this contract fit into the broader IT spending strategy of the U.S. Special Operations Command?

This $17.2 million contract likely represents a component of the U.S. Special Operations Command's (SOCOM) broader IT strategy, which prioritizes secure, reliable, and advanced technological capabilities to support special operations forces. SOCOM's IT needs are often highly specialized, focusing on areas like intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), secure communications, data analytics, and cyber warfare. Contracts like this one, for 'Other Computer Related Services,' could be crucial for maintaining the infrastructure that enables these advanced capabilities, ensuring operational readiness, and supporting information dominance in complex environments. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests a focus on predictable budgeting for these essential services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: MA Federal, Inc. (UEI: 942408766)

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DR STE 500, RESTON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,191,374

Exercised Options: $17,191,374

Current Obligation: $17,191,374

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222208D0017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-03-23

Current End Date: 2011-03-23

Potential End Date: 2011-03-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-12-03

More Contracts from Igov Technologies, Inc.

View all Igov Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending