DoD Awards Lockheed Martin $83.6M for Engineering Technical Services, Ending April 2013
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,713,923 ($20.7M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-01-31
End Date: 2013-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,646 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200605!000023!5700!FA8525!WR-ALC-LTKB !F0960301D0207 !A!N! !N!0115 ! !20060131!20080130!836196972!805258373!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYS!6801 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE !BETHESDA !MD!20817!49756!067!13!MARIETTA !COBB !GEORGIA !+000003400000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336411!E! !5!B!M! !C! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!010!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!D!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31088
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.7 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: 200605!000023!5700!FA8525!WR-ALC-LTKB !F0960301D0207 !A!N! !N!0115 ! !20060131!20080130!836196972!805258373!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYS!6801 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE !BETHESDA !MD!20817!49756!067!13!MARIETTA !COBB… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Lockheed Martin for engineering technical services. 2. The contract has a base value of $83.6 million. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 4. The sector is primarily Defense, with a focus on Aircraft Manufacturing. 5. The contract duration is substantial at 2646 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $83.6 million for engineering technical services appears reasonable given the extensive 7-year period of performance. Benchmarking against similar long-term, specialized engineering contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The specific price discovery mechanisms used during the bidding process are not detailed here.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure competitive pricing and avoid overpayment.
Public Impact
Supports critical defense engineering and technical services. Long-term contract provides stability for Lockheed Martin and ensures continuity of services. Potential for technology development and innovation within the aerospace and defense sector. Impacts the Georgia aerospace manufacturing ecosystem.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 78 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may introduce risks related to scope creep or evolving technological needs.
- Sole contractor for a significant period could lead to reduced future competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract may not fully account for unforeseen cost increases.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process.
- Significant contract value indicates a critical need for these services.
- Experienced contractor likely to deliver high-quality services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to Aircraft Manufacturing. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by national security requirements and technological advancements in aerospace.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific subcontracting goals or participation from small businesses in this contract award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating established oversight mechanisms. However, the specific details of ongoing performance monitoring and accountability are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long-term contract duration (7 years).
- Firm Fixed Price contract.
- Potential for technological obsolescence over the contract life.
- Limited visibility into specific performance metrics and oversight details.
Tags
aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ga, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.7 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC. 200605!000023!5700!FA8525!WR-ALC-LTKB !F0960301D0207 !A!N! !N!0115 ! !20060131!20080130!836196972!805258373!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYS!6801 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE !BETHESDA !MD!20817!49756!067!13!MARIETTA !COBB !GEORGIA !+000003400000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336411!E! !5!B!M! !C! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-01-31. End: 2013-04-30.
What specific engineering and technical services are covered under this contract, and how do they align with current defense priorities?
The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' and 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP'. While the exact scope is not detailed, these services likely encompass design, development, testing, and sustainment of complex electronic and communication systems crucial for modern defense platforms, aligning with the DoD's continuous need for advanced technological capabilities in these areas.
Given the 7-year duration, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost overruns or scope creep, especially under a Firm Fixed Price contract?
Firm Fixed Price contracts place the cost risk on the contractor. However, robust contract management by the DCMA would involve regular performance reviews, change control processes, and potentially contract modifications if unforeseen issues necessitate scope adjustments. The government's ability to manage scope creep is critical to controlling costs over the long term.
How will the effectiveness of these engineering technical services be measured, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?
Effectiveness is typically measured against defined performance standards and delivery schedules outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) might include on-time delivery, technical performance metrics, system reliability, and adherence to quality standards. The DCMA would monitor these KPIs to ensure Lockheed Martin meets its contractual obligations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 645 TALLULAH TRAIL SUITE 101, WARNER ROBINS, GA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F0960301D0207
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-01-31
Current End Date: 2013-04-30
Potential End Date: 2013-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-07-16
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC
- 200407!000098!5700!LA01 !11 Cons/Lgcw !FA701204C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20031121!20130630!836196972!805258373!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Integrated SYS!6801 Rockledge Drive !bethesda !nj!20817!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000010350876!n!n!000530185344!d399!other Adp&telecommunication Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541690!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!b!b!y!b! !a!n!l!2!007!b! !C!Y!F! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !b!z!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $679.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200611!007847!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0703db009 !A!N! !Y!0243 ! !20060831!20110129!068514251!805258373!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Integrated SYS!1800 Route 34 !wall !nj!07719!76460!025!34!wall (township OF) !monmouth !NEW Jersey!+000077463827!n!n!000000000000!r414!systems Engineering Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!014!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!z!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $448.3M (Department of Defense)
- ISS Cargo Mission Contract (CMC) — $406.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Moses II Effort IS a Five-Year Sole-Source Follow-On Contract to Maintain the Health and Safety of the HST Observatory Through the Next Phase of ITS Science Mission. the Scope of This Follow-On Effort Includes Conducting ALL Elements of HST Operations Other Than Science Operations, and to Perform Systems Engineering Tasks Required to Properly Maintain HST Flight and Ground Systems.mission Operations Responsibilities Include Safe and Efficient Control and Utilization of the HST Observatory, Maintenance and Operation of Hst-Unique Facilities and Equipment, AS Well AS Creation, Maintenance, and Utilization of HST Operations Processes and Procedures. Critical Systems Engineering Responsibilities Consist of Optimizing Mission System Capabilities to Maximize HST Operations Effectiveness and Science Productivity. Essential Management Requirements Include Providing a Technical Staff Possessing In-Depth Knowledge of HST S Varied, Complex, and Unique Flight and Ground Systems, Ensuring Successful Accomplishment of the Diverse Tasks Necessary to Effectively Conduct HST Mission Operations and Systems Engineering AS Well AS to Manage and Report Contract Element Cost and Schedule Performance — $360.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $304.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)