Air Force Awards $11.6M Contract for Aircraft Structural Component Repair to Lear Siegler Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,632,200 ($11.6M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-03-18
End Date: 2004-03-14
Contract Duration: 362 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200306!000355!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0103 !20030318!20040314!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!26736!027!48!FORT HOOD !BELL !TEXAS !+000000927435!N!N!000000000000!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!007!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: SPRINGFIELD, GREENE County, MISSOURI, 65801
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200306!000355!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0103 !20030318!20040314!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!26736!027!48!FORT HOOD !BELL … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for maintenance and repair of aircraft structural components. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract value is $11.6 million over approximately one year. 4. The sector is primarily Defense, specifically aircraft structural maintenance.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.6 million for a year of service appears reasonable for specialized aircraft structural repair. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aircraft component maintenance is difficult without more specific data on the scope of work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a fair market price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness of Air Force aircraft by maintaining structural integrity. Supports specialized maintenance and repair services, potentially creating skilled jobs. The contract contributes to the broader aerospace and defense industrial base.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is relatively short (approx. 1 year), which may lead to frequent re-competition and associated administrative costs.
- Lack of specific details on the scope of 'maintenance & repair' makes it hard to assess true value.
- Potential for cost overruns in time and materials contracts if not closely monitored.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract supports critical aircraft structural maintenance.
- Experienced contractor likely provides reliable service.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on the maintenance and repair of aircraft structural components. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and can be benchmarked against other MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) contracts within the DoD.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that the prime contractor is Lear Siegler Services, Inc. There is no explicit information provided regarding small business subcontracting participation in this award. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, implying oversight from this branch of the DoD. The 'time and materials' pricing structure necessitates robust oversight to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and that work is necessary.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns.
- Limited contract duration may increase administrative burden through frequent re-competition.
- Lack of detailed scope of work makes precise value assessment challenging.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200306!000355!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0103 !20030318!20040314!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!26736!027!48!FORT HOOD !BELL !TEXAS !+000000927435!N!N!000000000000!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-03-18. End: 2004-03-14.
What is the specific breakdown of services included in 'MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS' and how does this compare to industry standards for similar airframes?
The specific breakdown of services is not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the exact nature of the repairs, the types of structural components involved, and the labor hours required is crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. Comparing this to industry standards for similar aircraft maintenance contracts would reveal if the scope aligns with typical requirements and if the pricing is competitive for the services rendered.
Given this is a time and materials contract, what mechanisms are in place to control costs and prevent scope creep, especially considering the relatively short duration?
Time and materials contracts inherently carry a risk of cost escalation. Effective cost control relies on stringent oversight, detailed tracking of labor hours and material costs, and clear definition of the 'materials' allowed. For this contract, the Air Force likely employs contracting officers' representatives (CORs) to monitor work closely, approve expenditures, and ensure that only necessary repairs are performed within the defined scope to mitigate cost overruns.
How does the performance of Lear Siegler Services, Inc. on this contract compare to their historical performance on similar DoD contracts, and what is the impact on Air Force readiness?
Historical performance data for Lear Siegler Services, Inc. on similar contracts is not provided. Assessing their track record in terms of on-time delivery, quality of work, and adherence to budget would be key. Positive performance would directly contribute to maintaining the structural integrity and operational readiness of Air Force aircraft, ensuring mission capability. Negative performance could lead to delays and reduced fleet availability.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-03-18
Current End Date: 2004-03-14
Potential End Date: 2004-03-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-10-01
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)