Air Force awards $21.6M contract for family inprocessing services to Environmental Chemical Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,664,630 ($21.7M)

Contractor: Environmental Chemical Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-09-23

End Date: 2013-11-14

Contract Duration: 783 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DB RECRUIT FAMILY INPROCESSING AND INFORMATION CENTER LAFB

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO County, CALIFORNIA, 94010

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.7 million to ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION for work described as: DB RECRUIT FAMILY INPROCESSING AND INFORMATION CENTER LAFB Key points: 1. The contract value of $21.6 million is moderate for construction services. 2. Environmental Chemical Corporation is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but the lack of competition could inflate prices. 4. This spending falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded via a delivery order, suggesting it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. Without knowing the original IDIQ's pricing structure or other competing bids, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the total award of $21.6M for construction services over two years appears within a reasonable range for similar projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition. However, it was a single delivery order, and the data does not specify if multiple bids were received for this specific order. The firm fixed price contract type is intended to provide cost certainty.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which should drive down costs. However, the effectiveness of this competition for this specific delivery order is not fully detailed.

Public Impact

Supports military families by providing essential inprocessing and information services. The construction services likely involve facility upgrades or maintenance at LAFB. Ensures operational readiness and quality of life for service members and their families. The contract duration of over two years indicates a sustained need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition data for the specific delivery order.
Potential for cost overruns if scope significantly changed from original bid.
Limited information on contractor past performance for this specific service.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost risk to the government.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad search for contractors.
Contract supports critical family services for military personnel.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which includes a wide range of building projects. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on infrastructure needs and economic conditions. The $21.6 million award is a moderate sum for a construction project of this nature.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition, but it does not specify if small businesses participated or were subcontracted. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Air Force is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard government oversight procedures for construction contracts, including site inspections and progress reports, would apply. The contract's duration and value suggest a need for consistent monitoring.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost creep if scope was not clearly defined.
Limited transparency on the specific competitive bids received.
Reliance on a single awardee for this delivery order.
Contract duration extends beyond a single fiscal year, requiring sustained budget allocation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.7 million to ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION. DB RECRUIT FAMILY INPROCESSING AND INFORMATION CENTER LAFB

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-23. End: 2013-11-14.

What was the total number of bids received for this specific delivery order, and how did the winning bid compare to others?

The provided data indicates 'full and open competition' but does not specify the number of bids received for this particular delivery order. To fully assess value, understanding the competitive landscape for this specific award is crucial. Comparing the winning bid against other proposals would reveal the degree of price discovery and potential savings achieved.

Are there any performance metrics or quality assurance surveillance plans (QASP) associated with this contract to ensure service delivery meets expectations?

The data does not explicitly mention performance metrics or a QASP. However, for a contract of this nature and value, it is highly probable that the Air Force has established quality assurance procedures. These would typically involve monitoring the contractor's adherence to specifications, timelines, and service level agreements to mitigate performance risks.

How does the per-unit cost or cost per square foot for this construction project compare to similar projects awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?

Without specific details on the scope of work (e.g., square footage, type of construction/renovation), a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. Benchmarking would require detailed project specifications. However, the total award of $21.6 million over approximately two years suggests a moderate annual spend for construction services, which can be compared against broader sector averages.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1240 BAYSHORE HGHWY, BURLINGAME, CA, 94010

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,664,630

Exercised Options: $21,664,630

Current Obligation: $21,664,630

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA890306D8511

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline