Defense contract for remediation services awarded to AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC. for over $18.6 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,609,544 ($18.6M)

Contractor: Amec E&I Holdings, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-23

End Date: 2011-03-30

Contract Duration: 2,014 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200511!002243!5700!FA8903!HSW/PKV !F4162403D8606 !A!N! !N!0074 ! !20050923!20061231!178366183!178366183!066630070!N!MACTEC ENGINEERING & CONSULTIN!1105 SANCTUARY PKWY STE 30!ALPHARETTA !GA!30004!01696!121!13!ALPHARETTA !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000005891452!N!N!000000000000!C211!ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !562910!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20080630!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!030!D! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!Y! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ALPHARETTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30009

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.6 million to AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC. for work described as: 200511!002243!5700!FA8903!HSW/PKV !F4162403D8606 !A!N! !N!0074 ! !20050923!20061231!178366183!178366183!066630070!N!MACTEC ENGINEERING & CONSULTIN!1105 SANCTUARY PKWY STE 30!ALPHARETTA !GA!30004!01696!121!13!ALPHARETTA !FULT… Key points: 1. Contract value of $18.6 million for remediation services indicates a significant investment in environmental cleanup. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. A duration of over 6 years (from 2005 to 2011) points to a long-term environmental management need. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562910 for Remediation Services aligns with environmental cleanup activities. 5. The contract's performance period spans multiple fiscal years, requiring sustained funding and oversight. 6. The award was made by the Department of Defense, highlighting potential environmental liabilities or cleanup requirements on military installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $18.6 million for remediation services appears reasonable given the extended performance period of over six years. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental cleanup contracts would provide further context on value for money. The 'Time and Materials' pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, but the overall value seems appropriate for the scope of work implied by the duration and agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. While the number of bidders is not explicitly stated in the provided data, this type of competition generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing among potential contractors. This approach is intended to ensure the government receives the best value by considering a wide range of qualified offerors.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down costs through market forces, ensuring that public funds are used efficiently for essential services like environmental remediation.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military installations or federal sites requiring environmental remediation, leading to improved environmental conditions and compliance. Services delivered include remediation activities, which could encompass soil, water, or hazardous material cleanup. The geographic impact is primarily within Georgia, as indicated by the contractor's address and state code. Workforce implications include the creation of jobs for environmental scientists, engineers, technicians, and laborers involved in the cleanup operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost escalation under Time and Materials pricing if not rigorously monitored.
Long contract duration may require adjustments for evolving environmental regulations or remediation technologies.
Dependence on a single contractor for an extended period could limit flexibility in adopting new approaches.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Contractor's location in Georgia may indicate local economic benefits and familiarity with regional environmental conditions.
The significant contract value suggests the contractor possesses the capacity and expertise for large-scale remediation projects.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation services sector is a critical component of the broader construction and professional services industries. This contract falls under the NAICS code 562910, which covers establishments primarily engaged in cleaning up sites, processing, and disposing of contaminated soil and groundwater. The market for environmental remediation is driven by regulatory compliance, historical contamination, and ongoing industrial activities. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government priorities, infrastructure projects, and environmental policy changes.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through direct subcontracting relationships with AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC., if such arrangements were made.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the awarding agency, the Department of Defense, through its contracting officers and potentially the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Accountability measures would include adherence to contract terms, performance standards, and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Defense Environmental Cleanup Program
Hazardous Waste Management
Site Remediation Contracts
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Long contract duration may present challenges in adapting to evolving regulations or technologies.
Lack of specific performance metrics in award data makes effectiveness assessment difficult.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.6 million to AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC.. 200511!002243!5700!FA8903!HSW/PKV !F4162403D8606 !A!N! !N!0074 ! !20050923!20061231!178366183!178366183!066630070!N!MACTEC ENGINEERING & CONSULTIN!1105 SANCTUARY PKWY STE 30!ALPHARETTA !GA!30004!01696!121!13!ALPHARETTA !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000005891452!N!N!000000000000!C211!ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !562910!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-23. End: 2011-03-30.

What is the track record of AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC. with federal contracts, particularly in environmental remediation?

AMEC E&I HOLDINGS, INC. (and its parent/related entities) has a history of securing federal contracts, primarily within the defense and environmental sectors. While the provided data focuses on a single large award, a comprehensive analysis would involve examining their portfolio across various agencies, contract types, and performance histories. Their involvement in a $18.6 million remediation contract with the Department of Defense suggests a capacity for handling significant environmental projects. Further investigation into past performance reviews, any contract disputes, or awards for similar services would provide a more complete picture of their federal contracting track record and reliability in executing complex environmental tasks.

How does the $18.6 million contract value compare to other federal remediation contracts awarded around the same period?

The $18.6 million contract value for environmental remediation services, awarded in 2005, is substantial and indicates a significant project scope. To benchmark this value, one would compare it against other large-scale remediation contracts awarded by agencies like the EPA, Department of Defense, or Department of Energy during the mid-2000s. Contracts for Superfund site cleanups, base realignment and closure (BRAC) environmental actions, or extensive hazardous material removal often reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. This particular contract's value appears to be in the upper tier for single-award remediation projects of its duration, suggesting a complex or extensive cleanup operation was undertaken.

What are the primary risks associated with a 'Time and Materials' contract for environmental remediation?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one awarded here, carry inherent risks, primarily concerning cost control. For environmental remediation, where unforeseen site conditions or complexities can arise, T&M can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently. The government bears the risk of increased costs due to inefficiencies or extended timelines by the contractor. Key risks include: potential for scope creep without formal change orders, difficulty in accurately estimating total project cost upfront, and the need for robust government oversight to monitor labor hours and material usage. Mitigation strategies involve detailed work breakdown structures, strict monitoring of timesheets and invoices, and clear definitions of billable hours and material costs.

What was the effectiveness of the remediation services provided under this contract?

The provided data does not contain information on the effectiveness of the remediation services. Assessing effectiveness would require access to post-award performance reports, environmental monitoring data, regulatory compliance records, and potentially site closure documentation. Key indicators of effectiveness would include the degree to which contaminants were removed or contained, compliance with environmental standards (e.g., EPA regulations), and the long-term stability of the remediated site. Without such post-award data, it is impossible to determine the success of the contractor's efforts in achieving the environmental cleanup objectives.

How has federal spending on environmental remediation services evolved since this contract was awarded in 2005?

Federal spending on environmental remediation has generally remained a significant budgetary item, driven by ongoing cleanup needs at federal facilities, regulatory mandates, and infrastructure investments. Since 2005, spending patterns have been influenced by factors such as increased focus on climate change adaptation, renewable energy infrastructure, and the modernization of aging federal facilities. While specific year-over-year figures fluctuate based on appropriations and program priorities, the overall demand for remediation services, particularly for hazardous materials and contaminated sites, has persisted. Government initiatives aimed at brownfield redevelopment and environmental justice may also shape future spending priorities in this sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1105 SANCTUARY PARKWAY, ALPHARETTA, GA, 07

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F4162403D8606

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline