Boeing Awarded $47.8M for Aircraft Fixed Wing Equipment, Defense Contract Faces Scrutiny

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,867,609 ($47.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-04-08

End Date: 2009-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,971 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200407!000035!5700!GU11 !ASC/VXK !F3365798D0002 !A!N! !N!0067 ! !20040408!20050630!617869912!085188316!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !626 ANCHORS ST NW !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32548!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000004734115!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !* !335999!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!A!N!J!1!001!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WALTON BEACH, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32548

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 200407!000035!5700!GU11 !ASC/VXK !F3365798D0002 !A!N! !N!0067 ! !20040408!20050630!617869912!085188316!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !626 ANCHORS ST NW !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32548!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKAL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to The Boeing Company for aircraft equipment. 2. Significant value of $47.8 million raises questions about cost-effectiveness. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, but oversight is needed. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $47.8 million for aircraft equipment appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for fixed-wing aircraft components is necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive and reflects fair market value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is a positive sign for price discovery. However, the final price and its justification require further examination to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial value of this contract necessitates careful monitoring to ensure it represents good value for taxpayers and that the awarded price is justified.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding a significant contract for aircraft equipment. The defense sector's spending on aircraft components impacts national security budgets. Potential for cost overruns or inefficiencies in large defense contracts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • High contract value
  • Potential for cost escalation
  • Limited transparency on specific equipment details

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized
  • Awarded to a major defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing. Spending in this area is critical for national security but also represents a significant portion of the defense budget, requiring diligent oversight.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no immediate indication of small business participation in this specific award, which warrants further investigation to ensure opportunities for small businesses are not overlooked.

Oversight & Accountability

While full and open competition was used, the substantial value of this contract necessitates robust oversight from the Defense Contract Management Agency to ensure compliance, quality, and cost control throughout the contract lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • High contract value
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited detail on specific equipment
  • Long contract duration

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, fl, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 200407!000035!5700!GU11 !ASC/VXK !F3365798D0002 !A!N! !N!0067 ! !20040408!20050630!617869912!085188316!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !626 ANCHORS ST NW !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32548!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000004734115!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !* !335999!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-04-08. End: 2009-08-31.

What specific aircraft fixed-wing equipment is being procured, and how does its cost compare to industry benchmarks?

The data indicates the procurement is for 'Aircraft Fixed Wing' and 'Other Aircraft Equipment' under NAICS code 336411. A detailed breakdown of the specific components and their unit costs is needed to compare against industry benchmarks. Without this granular data, assessing the value for money is challenging, though the overall contract value of $47.8 million suggests a significant acquisition.

What are the key performance indicators and risk mitigation strategies for this contract, given its duration and value?

The contract has a duration of 1971 days (from award to estimated completion) and a value of $47.8 million. Key performance indicators should focus on timely delivery, adherence to specifications, and quality control. Risk mitigation strategies should address potential supply chain disruptions, technological obsolescence, and cost overruns, especially given the firm fixed-price nature which places cost risk on the contractor.

How does the utilization of 'full and open competition' translate into cost savings or improved outcomes for this specific contract?

Full and open competition theoretically drives down prices by allowing multiple qualified bidders to compete. For this $47.8 million contract, it suggests that multiple companies had the opportunity to bid. The effectiveness of this competition in achieving cost savings and optimal outcomes depends on the number of bids received, the competitiveness of those bids, and the final negotiated price compared to initial estimates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 626 ANCHORS ST NW, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 01

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3365798D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-04-08

Current End Date: 2009-08-31

Potential End Date: 2009-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-08-06

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending