DoD's $186M Oshkosh Corp Contract for Turbine Upgrade Kits Lacked Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $186,359,691 ($186.4M)

Contractor: Oshkosh Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-30

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $170.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Manufacturing

Official Description: ORDER ECP 89, ECP 94, AND ECP 75 UPGRADE KITS.

Place of Performance

Location: OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO County, WISCONSIN, 54903

State: Wisconsin Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $186.4 million to OSHKOSH CORP for work described as: ORDER ECP 89, ECP 94, AND ECP 75 UPGRADE KITS. Key points: 1. Significant spending on turbine upgrade kits by the Department of the Navy. 2. Sole-source award to Oshkosh Corp raises questions about price discovery. 3. Contract duration of 3 years with a firm fixed-price structure. 4. Manufacturing sector focus on turbine and generator set units.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $186.6 million for turbine upgrade kits is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar contracts or alternative solutions.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to Oshkosh Corp. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition in this $186.6 million contract may result in inflated prices, impacting taxpayer funds negatively.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential military equipment due to a lack of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense relies on a single supplier for critical upgrade kits, potentially creating supply chain vulnerabilities. This contract highlights a potential area for improved procurement practices within the Navy to ensure better value for money.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award
  • Potential for overpayment

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract
  • Defined contract duration

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the manufacturing sector, specifically for turbine and turbine generator set units. The $186.6 million award is significant for this niche manufacturing area, and the lack of competition warrants scrutiny.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation may be needed to determine if small business participation was considered or possible.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this contract suggests a potential gap in oversight regarding competitive procurement strategies. Ensuring fair and open competition is crucial for accountability and cost-effectiveness.

Related Government Programs

  • Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited transparency in cost justification
  • Potential supply chain vulnerability

Tags

turbine-and-turbine-generator-set-units-, department-of-defense, wi, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $186.4 million to OSHKOSH CORP. ORDER ECP 89, ECP 94, AND ECP 75 UPGRADE KITS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OSHKOSH CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $186.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2011-09-30.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of seeking competitive bids?

The provided data does not specify the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are justified by factors such as unique capabilities, urgent needs, or the unavailability of other sources. A thorough review would be required to validate the necessity of this approach and ensure it was the most cost-effective option for the government.

How does the unit cost of these upgrade kits compare to industry benchmarks or previous procurements?

Without competitive bidding data or access to detailed cost breakdowns, it is challenging to establish a precise unit cost benchmark. The $186.6 million total award over 1095 days for an unspecified number of kits makes per-unit cost calculation difficult. Comparing this to similar contracts or internal cost estimates would be necessary to assess value.

What is the potential impact on operational readiness if Oshkosh Corp is the only provider of these critical upgrade kits?

Sole reliance on Oshkosh Corp for these critical upgrade kits could pose a risk to operational readiness. Any disruption in Oshkosh's production, supply chain issues, or pricing disputes could directly impact the Navy's ability to maintain its turbine systems. Diversifying suppliers or ensuring robust contingency plans would mitigate this risk.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingEngine, Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment ManufacturingTurbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2307OREGON STREET, OSHKOSH, WI, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $186,364,899

Exercised Options: $186,364,899

Current Obligation: $186,359,691

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785404D5016

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-09-30

Current End Date: 2011-09-30

Potential End Date: 2011-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-10-04

More Contracts from Oshkosh Corp

View all Oshkosh Corp federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending