Army Awards $154.5M for Facilities Support Services to KBR Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $154,472,182 ($154.5M)

Contractor: KBR Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-08-11

End Date: 2005-05-29

Contract Duration: 657 days

Daily Burn Rate: $235.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200311!001395!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0007 !A!N! !Y!0056 !20030811!20120131!016111226!016111226!964409007!N!BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, A DIVIS!4100 CLINTON DRIVE !HOUSTON !TX!77020!* !* !QA!* !* !QATAR !+000040975000!N!N!000000000000!AD23!RDTE/SERVICES-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!R!2!003!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77002

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $154.5 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200311!001395!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0007 !A!N! !Y!0056 !20030811!20120131!016111226!016111226!964409007!N!BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, A DIVIS!4100 CLINTON DRIVE !HOUSTON !TX!77020!* !* !QA!* !* … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities support services in Qatar. 2. KBR Services, LLC is the contractor, with a significant contract value. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The sector is primarily services, specifically facilities support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $154.5 million is substantial for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts would require more detailed service scope and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield reasonable value for taxpayer funds, though the specific cost-effectiveness requires further analysis of the service scope.

Public Impact

Supports U.S. Army operations in Qatar, contributing to national security objectives. Provides essential facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. The large contract value indicates significant resource allocation to this service area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration is relatively long (657 days).
  • Cost Plus Award Fee contract type can incentivize performance but may lead to higher costs if not managed closely.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contractor has a significant presence and likely expertise in the required services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which is a broad category encompassing maintenance, operations, and management of physical infrastructure. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on location and scope of services required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense through the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of oversight for Cost Plus Award Fee contracts is crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Facilities Support Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration.
  • Cost Plus Award Fee contract type.
  • Lack of detailed service scope in provided data.
  • No indication of small business subcontracting.

Tags

facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $154.5 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC. 200311!001395!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0007 !A!N! !Y!0056 !20030811!20120131!016111226!016111226!964409007!N!BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, A DIVIS!4100 CLINTON DRIVE !HOUSTON !TX!77020!* !* !QA!* !* !QATAR !+000040975000!N!N!000000000000!AD23!RDTE/SERVICES-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KBR SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $154.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-08-11. End: 2005-05-29.

What specific services are included under 'Facilities Support Services' for this contract, and how do they align with operational needs in Qatar?

The provided data categorizes the service under NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) and PSC code AD23 (RDTE/SERVICES-ADV TECH DEV). While 'Services' is listed, the specifics of 'Facilities Support' are not detailed. This could range from base operations and maintenance to specialized technical support. Understanding the precise scope is critical for assessing value and effectiveness, especially in a deployed environment like Qatar.

How does the Cost Plus Award Fee structure impact the final cost and contractor performance for this $154.5 million contract?

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure allows the contractor to recover allowable costs plus a base fee, with the potential for an award fee based on performance. While CPAF can incentivize high performance, it also carries a risk of cost overruns if performance metrics are not tightly defined and monitored. The final cost could exceed initial estimates if award fees are maximized, necessitating rigorous oversight to ensure value for money.

Given the contract's duration and value, what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) being used to measure contractor success and ensure accountability?

The data does not specify the KPIs for this contract. For a CPAF contract of this magnitude and duration, KPIs would likely focus on operational availability of facilities, response times for maintenance, safety compliance, and overall mission support effectiveness. Robust KPIs, coupled with regular performance reviews by the Defense Contract Management Agency, are essential for ensuring accountability and achieving the desired outcomes within the allocated budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Brown & Root Industrial Services Holdings, LLC

Address: 601 JEFFERSON ST, HOUSTON, TX, 77002

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAA0902D0007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-08-11

Current End Date: 2005-05-29

Potential End Date: 2005-05-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-04-12

More Contracts from KBR Services, LLC

View all KBR Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending