DoD Awards $177.7M for Guard Services to Chenega Integrated Systems LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,525,072 ($15.5M)

Contractor: Chenega Integrated Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-08-29

End Date: 2007-10-08

Contract Duration: 770 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200512!500291!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!DABJ0103D0010 !A!N! !Y!0049 ! !20050829!20051007!177674665!177674665!622692994!N!CHENEGA INTERGRATED SYSTEMS LL!1509 SAINT ANDREWS BLVD !PANAMA CITY !FL!32405!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000000641970!N!N!000000000000!S206!GUARD SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561612!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!1!001!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT MYER, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22211

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.5 million to CHENEGA INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: 200512!500291!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!DABJ0103D0010 !A!N! !Y!0049 ! !20050829!20051007!177674665!177674665!622692994!N!CHENEGA INTERGRATED SYSTEMS LL!1509 SAINT ANDREWS BLVD !PANAMA CITY !FL!32405!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DIST… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Chenega Integrated Systems LLC for guard services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The total value of the award is $177,674,665. 4. The contract duration is 770 days. 5. The primary sector for this spending is Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $177.7 million over approximately two years suggests a significant but not exceptionally high per-year cost for comprehensive guard services. Without specific unit costs or service levels, direct comparison is difficult, but it appears within a reasonable range for large-scale security operations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring competitive pricing. This method generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving fair value for the services rendered, as multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid.

Public Impact

Ensures security and protection for government facilities and personnel. Supports the operational readiness of the Department of Defense. Provides employment opportunities within the security services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration is relatively short, potentially requiring re-competition soon.
  • Specific performance metrics and service level agreements are not detailed here.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Significant contract value indicates a substantial need for the services.
  • Contractor has a history of providing services to the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Security and Protection Services sector, which is a critical component of government operations. Spending in this area is consistent with the need to maintain secure facilities and personnel across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

While the award went to Chenega Integrated Systems LLC, a large business, the use of full and open competition allows for potential subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the security services industry.

Oversight & Accountability

The award process, being full and open competition, implies a degree of oversight. However, ongoing oversight of performance and adherence to contract terms by the Department of Defense is crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract awarded to a single entity.
  • Fixed-price contract type.
  • Contract duration of 770 days.
  • No specific small business subcontracting goals mentioned.

Tags

department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.5 million to CHENEGA INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LLC. 200512!500291!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!DABJ0103D0010 !A!N! !Y!0049 ! !20050829!20051007!177674665!177674665!622692994!N!CHENEGA INTERGRATED SYSTEMS LL!1509 SAINT ANDREWS BLVD !PANAMA CITY !FL!32405!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000000641970!N!N!000000000000!S206!GUARD SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561612!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHENEGA INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-29. End: 2007-10-08.

What specific guard services are included in this contract, and how do they align with the DoD's security requirements?

The contract specifies 'GUARD SERVICES' under PSC code 561612. While the exact scope isn't detailed, this typically includes physical security, access control, patrols, and monitoring of DoD facilities. The alignment with requirements would be assessed through the performance work statement and subsequent evaluations of the contractor's execution.

What is the potential risk associated with a fixed-price contract of this magnitude for guard services?

Fixed-price contracts can pose a risk if the scope of work is not precisely defined, potentially leading to cost overruns for the contractor or the government if unforeseen issues arise. For guard services, risks include understaffing or inadequate training if the contractor prioritizes profit over service quality, necessitating close government monitoring.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring the best value for guard services compared to other contracting methods?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring best value as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. This approach allows the government to select the offer that best balances cost, technical capability, and past performance.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: THE Chenega Corporation (UEI: 622692994)

Address: 1509 ST ANDREWS BOULEVARD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405

Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DABJ0103D0010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-08-29

Current End Date: 2007-10-08

Potential End Date: 2007-10-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-09-24

More Contracts from Chenega Integrated Systems LLC

View all Chenega Integrated Systems LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending