DoD Awards $152.6M for Engineering Technical Services to Engility LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $152,637,493 ($152.6M)

Contractor: Engility LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-04-26

End Date: 2010-04-29

Contract Duration: 2,194 days

Daily Burn Rate: $69.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200407!004947!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702DP001 !A!N! !Y!0041 ! !20040426!20061031!808357131!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ILEX SYSTEM!1413 CANTILLION BLVD, SUIT!MAYS LANDING !NJ!08330!24480!025!34!FORT MONMOUTH !MONMOUTH !NEW JERSEY!+000000180000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !D!D!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MOUNT LAUREL, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08054, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $152.6 million to ENGILITY LLC for work described as: 200407!004947!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702DP001 !A!N! !Y!0041 ! !20040426!20061031!808357131!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ILEX SYSTEM!1413 CANTILLION BLVD, SUIT!MAYS LANDING !NJ!08330!24480!025!34!FORT MONMOUTH !MONM… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering and technical services, primarily in electronics and communication equipment. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risk associated with the Time and Materials pricing structure, which can lead to cost overruns. 4. The sector is dominated by IT and Defense, with this contract falling under engineering services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $152.6 million over approximately 6 years appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants close monitoring for cost efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition likely optimized pricing, the Time and Materials contract type poses a risk of exceeding initial estimates, potentially impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Specialized engineering and technical services are crucial for national defense infrastructure. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these services. The award to Engility LLC highlights the role of large contractors in supporting government technical requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing structure
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Award to established contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is closely related to IT and Defense spending. Benchmarks for similar long-term engineering support contracts vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The award to Engility LLC, a larger entity, suggests that small businesses may not have been primary awardees on this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the Time and Materials pricing requires diligent monitoring to ensure accountability and prevent waste.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing structure
  • Long contract duration (over 6 years)
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of specific small business participation noted

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, nj, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $152.6 million to ENGILITY LLC. 200407!004947!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702DP001 !A!N! !Y!0041 ! !20040426!20061031!808357131!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ILEX SYSTEM!1413 CANTILLION BLVD, SUIT!MAYS LANDING !NJ!08330!24480!025!34!FORT MONMOUTH !MONMOUTH !NEW JERSEY!+000000180000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $152.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-04-26. End: 2010-04-29.

What specific engineering technical services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current defense needs?

The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' and 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP'. These services likely encompass design, development, testing, and maintenance of communication systems and related electronic equipment vital for military operations. Their alignment with current defense needs would depend on the specific technological advancements and operational requirements prioritized by the Department of the Army at the time of award.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this $152.6 million award?

The primary risk of a T&M contract is the potential for cost escalation, as the government pays for actual labor hours and material costs incurred by the contractor. Without strong oversight and defined ceilings, this can lead to the contract exceeding its estimated value. For a large, long-term contract like this, managing scope creep and ensuring efficient resource utilization are critical to mitigate financial risks.

How effective was the full and open competition in ensuring the best value for taxpayers on this contract?

Full and open competition is generally designed to achieve the best value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices. While it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source award, the effectiveness in ensuring the 'best' value is also dependent on the clarity of the requirements, the evaluation criteria, and the contractor's ability to deliver within the T&M framework. Ongoing performance monitoring is key to confirming long-term value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Engility Corporation (UEI: 783837672)

Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0702DP001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-04-26

Current End Date: 2010-04-29

Potential End Date: 2010-04-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-09-14

More Contracts from Engility LLC

View all Engility LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending