DoD's $25.2M IGF ESS Basic Storage Solution Services contract awarded to VION CORPORATION

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,200,818 ($25.2M)

Contractor: Vion Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-10-01

End Date: 2016-02-07

Contract Duration: 129 days

Daily Burn Rate: $195.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF ESS BASIC STORAGE SOLUTION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20007

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.2 million to VION CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF ESS BASIC STORAGE SOLUTION SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in essential IT infrastructure for the Defense Information Systems Agency. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are crucial for ensuring cost-effectiveness and optimal service delivery. 3. Performance monitoring and risk indicators will be key to managing this service contract effectively. 4. The contract's duration and fixed-price nature suggest a defined scope and budget control. 5. This spending falls within the broader category of IT services supporting defense operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more granular data on the specific storage solutions and service levels provided. Without comparable contract data for similar 'ESS Basic Storage Solution Services,' it's difficult to definitively assess if the $25.2 million price tag represents excellent value. The fixed-price nature suggests an attempt at cost control, but the actual value realized depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of VION CORPORATION's service delivery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. With 3 bidders, the competition level suggests a moderate degree of market interest. This level of competition is generally positive for price discovery, as it incentivizes bidders to offer competitive pricing to secure the contract.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its various components relying on the Defense Information Systems Agency for IT infrastructure. The services delivered include the provision and maintenance of basic storage solutions, critical for data management and accessibility. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the District of Columbia, where the contract is managed. Workforce implications may include IT specialists involved in the implementation, management, and support of the storage solutions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the solution is proprietary and difficult to migrate away from.
Risk of performance degradation if service level agreements are not strictly enforced.
Dependency on a single vendor for critical storage infrastructure.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
Defined contract duration limits long-term financial commitment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on IT infrastructure services. The market for data storage solutions is highly competitive and constantly evolving, with significant spending by government agencies to maintain and upgrade their digital capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale storage solution contracts awarded by federal agencies, considering factors like capacity, performance tiers, and service level agreements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best solution from the available market, rather than specifically promoting small business participation through this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the Defense Information Systems Agency's program management office. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance work statement and service level agreements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Information Systems Agency IT Services
Federal Data Storage Solutions
Department of Defense Cloud and Infrastructure Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs despite fixed-price.
Risk of vendor lock-in with proprietary storage solutions.
Performance issues if SLAs are not adequately monitored or enforced.
Dependency on a single vendor for critical infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.2 million to VION CORPORATION. IGF::CL::IGF ESS BASIC STORAGE SOLUTION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-10-01. End: 2016-02-07.

What specific type of 'basic storage solution' was procured under this contract, and what were the key performance indicators?

The provided data does not specify the exact type of 'basic storage solution' beyond its classification under NAICS code 541519 (Other Computer Related Services). Key performance indicators (KPIs) are also not detailed in the summary data. Typically, for storage solutions, KPIs would include metrics such as storage capacity (in TB or PB), IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second), latency, uptime/availability (e.g., 99.999%), and data transfer speeds. Understanding these specifics is crucial for evaluating the value and effectiveness of the procured services.

How does the awarded amount of $25.2 million compare to similar 'ESS Basic Storage Solution Services' contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?

Direct comparison is challenging without more specific details on the scope and service levels. However, $25.2 million over a period of approximately 4 months (October 2015 to February 2016) suggests a substantial monthly expenditure. To benchmark, one would need to identify contracts for similar storage services (e.g., SAN, NAS, object storage) with comparable capacity, performance, and support requirements. Factors like the number of users, data criticality, and geographic distribution of the storage would also influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests this is a significant investment, warranting a detailed value analysis against comparable procurements.

What is VION CORPORATION's track record with the Department of Defense and specifically with the Defense Information Systems Agency for IT services?

VION CORPORATION has a history of contracting with the federal government, including the Department of Defense. To assess their track record for IT services with DISA, a deeper dive into past performance evaluations, contract history databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov), and any reported issues or successes would be necessary. This includes examining previous contracts for similar services, their performance ratings, and any modifications or disputes. A positive track record with DISA would indicate reliability and capability in delivering complex IT solutions.

What were the primary risks identified during the solicitation and award process for this contract, and how were they mitigated?

Specific risks identified during the solicitation and award are not detailed in the provided summary. However, common risks for IT infrastructure contracts include technical risks (solution obsolescence, integration challenges), performance risks (failure to meet SLAs), schedule risks (delays in deployment), and cost risks (cost overruns, though mitigated by fixed-price). Mitigation strategies typically involve thorough technical evaluations, robust performance monitoring, clear contract terms and conditions, and contingency planning. The full and open competition likely helped identify and address potential risks through the competitive process.

How has spending on 'ESS Basic Storage Solution Services' evolved within the DoD over the past five years, and does this contract represent a trend?

Analyzing the evolution of spending on 'ESS Basic Storage Solution Services' within the DoD requires access to historical spending data across multiple fiscal years. This specific contract, awarded in FY2015/2016, represents a point-in-time investment. To identify trends, one would need to aggregate spending data for similar storage solutions procured by the DoD over several years. Factors such as the shift towards cloud storage, data growth rates, and evolving cybersecurity requirements would influence these trends. This contract's value alone doesn't establish a trend but contributes to the overall picture of DoD's infrastructure spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HC101306R2005

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 406, WASHINGTON, DC, 20007

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,200,818

Exercised Options: $25,200,818

Current Obligation: $25,200,818

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC101307D2009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline