DoD awards $143.9M contract to Parsons Government Services Inc. for unspecified services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $143,939,078 ($143.9M)

Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-08-08

End Date: 2004-09-30

Contract Duration: 419 days

Daily Burn Rate: $343.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $143.9 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value is substantial at $143.9 million. 2. Competition method was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks. 4. No small business participation noted, which may be a missed opportunity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $143.9 million is significant. Without specific service details or comparable contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, Time and Materials contracts can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed closely.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally allows for the widest range of potential bidders and can foster competitive pricing. The impact on price discovery is positive, as multiple bids are likely to have been considered.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers, as it aims to secure the best value through a competitive process. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants careful oversight to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Significant taxpayer funds allocated to a single contractor. Lack of specific service details makes public understanding of the spending's purpose challenging. Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The Department of Defense frequently procures a wide range of services. The $143.9 million award is substantial, but without knowing the specific service category, it's hard to benchmark against sector averages. Defense spending often involves complex, high-value contracts.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that no small business participation was involved in this award. This suggests that the prime contractor, Parsons Government Services Inc., did not subcontract with small businesses for this particular contract, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller entities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of Time and Materials contracts is crucial to ensure that costs remain reasonable and that the services provided align with the contract's objectives. The Department of the Army, as the awarding agency, would be responsible for monitoring performance and expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $143.9 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $143.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-08-08. End: 2004-09-30.

What specific services were procured under this $143.9 million contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's mission requirements?

The provided data does not specify the services procured. Understanding the nature of these services is critical to assessing their necessity and value to the Department of the Army's mission. Without this information, it is impossible to determine if the $143.9 million expenditure represents an effective use of taxpayer funds or if it directly supports strategic objectives.

What measures were in place to control costs and ensure fair pricing given the Time and Materials contract type?

Time and Materials contracts carry inherent risks of cost escalation if not rigorously managed. Effective oversight would involve detailed tracking of labor hours and material costs, comparison against established benchmarks, and strict adherence to contract limitations. The absence of specific cost control details in the data raises concerns about potential inefficiencies and the ultimate value for money.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for the government and taxpayers?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals and securing the best possible price. The success of this process in achieving best value depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the government's ability to negotiate effectively with the winning bidder.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Parsons Corporation (UEI: 030866545)

Address: 100 W WALNUT ST, PASADENA, CA, 28

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DACA8700D0038

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-08-08

Current End Date: 2004-09-30

Potential End Date: 2004-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-02-03

More Contracts from Parsons Government Services Inc.

View all Parsons Government Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending