DoD's $23.4M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for Naval Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,420,472 ($23.4M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-12-14

End Date: 2013-06-14

Contract Duration: 913 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.4 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 913 days indicates a medium-term engagement for engineering services. 3. Amentum Technology, Inc. has secured this significant award, highlighting their role in defense contracting. 4. The fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and budget, potentially mitigating cost overruns. 5. Services fall under engineering, a critical support function for naval operations. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, a major component of the DoD.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $23.4 million over approximately 2.5 years for engineering services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts for naval operations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature suggests a degree of cost control was established upfront. Without specific performance metrics or detailed service breakdowns, a definitive assessment of excellence is challenging, but the award through full and open competition implies a competitive pricing environment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of multiple bidders, though the exact number is not specified in the provided data, typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of technical solutions. This method is generally preferred for ensuring the government receives the best value by leveraging market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through rivalry among contractors, ensuring that public funds are used efficiently and effectively.

Public Impact

Naval operations and readiness are directly supported by the engineering services provided under this contract. Personnel within the Department of the Navy benefit from enhanced technical and engineering support. The contract likely impacts the workforce involved in engineering and technical services, potentially creating or sustaining jobs. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval bases or facilities where these engineering services are required.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a vital component of the broader professional services industry supporting government operations. The market for engineering services supporting defense and naval applications is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. This contract represents a portion of the Department of Defense's investment in maintaining and enhancing its fleet and infrastructure, aligning with broader trends in defense procurement for specialized technical expertise.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is likely a large business, and any subcontracting opportunities would be at their discretion, not mandated by a small business set-aside. This means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is minimal.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract structure, which incentivizes the contractor to meet defined deliverables within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance oversight details are not provided. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, engineering-services, professional-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, amentum-technology-inc, virginia, naval-support, medium-contract-value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.4 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-12-14. End: 2013-06-14.

What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of the Navy and similar engineering contracts?

Amentum Technology, Inc. (formerly AECOM's Management Services business) has a significant history of performing complex engineering, technology, and support services for the Department of Defense, including the Navy. They have been involved in numerous large-scale contracts related to naval ship maintenance, infrastructure support, and advanced technology integration. Their track record generally indicates experience in managing large, multi-year programs. Specific performance metrics for this particular contract would require access to past performance evaluations and contract close-out reports, which are not publicly detailed in the provided data. However, their continued success in winning competitive bids suggests a generally positive performance history.

How does the $23.4 million value compare to similar engineering services contracts for naval support?

The $23.4 million contract value for engineering services over approximately 2.5 years (913 days) is within a typical range for specialized support to naval operations. Larger, more complex programs involving ship design, major overhauls, or extensive infrastructure development can easily reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, more focused technical assistance contracts might be in the low millions. This contract appears to be of moderate size, suggesting it covers a defined set of engineering tasks rather than a comprehensive overhaul or new development. Benchmarking against contracts with similar scope (e.g., technical studies, system engineering support, maintenance planning) awarded by the Navy or other branches would provide a more precise comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of engineering services contract for the Department of the Navy?

Key risks for the Department of the Navy in this engineering services contract include potential cost overruns if the fixed-price scope is not meticulously managed, contractor performance issues leading to delays or subpar quality, and the risk of technical obsolescence if the engineering solutions are not forward-looking. There's also a risk related to contractor dependency; if Amentum Technology, Inc. experiences significant financial or operational difficulties, it could disrupt critical naval support. Ensuring the government maintains sufficient technical oversight to validate the contractor's work and manage scope changes effectively is crucial to mitigating these risks.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for money for this specific contract?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money, as it allows the widest possible pool of qualified contractors to bid, fostering price competition. For this $23.4 million engineering services contract, it implies that multiple companies likely submitted proposals, driving Amentum Technology, Inc. to offer competitive pricing and technical solutions. The effectiveness is further enhanced by the fixed-price contract type, which shifts some of the cost-risk to the contractor. However, true value for money also depends on the clarity of the statement of work and the government's ability to effectively evaluate proposals and manage the contract post-award.

What are the historical spending patterns for engineering services by the Department of the Navy?

The Department of the Navy consistently allocates substantial funding towards engineering services, reflecting the complexity and maintenance needs of its vast fleet and shore infrastructure. Historical spending patterns show significant investments in areas such as ship design and modernization, weapons systems engineering, C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) development, and facilities engineering. These services are often procured through a mix of contract types, including fixed-price and cost-reimbursement, and competition levels vary depending on the criticality and specificity of the requirement. The total annual spending on engineering services by the Navy typically runs into billions of dollars, supporting a wide range of contractors from large aerospace and defense firms to specialized engineering consultancies.

What is the significance of the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) in the context of this contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330, 'Engineering Services,' signifies that the primary business activity covered by this contract involves the application of engineering principles and knowledge to provide services such as designing, developing, and implementing systems; conducting feasibility studies; providing technical consultation; and performing construction management. For the Department of the Navy, this code indicates that the contract is for specialized technical expertise required for naval platforms, systems, or infrastructure. It encompasses a broad range of engineering disciplines, from mechanical and electrical to civil and aerospace, ensuring that the procured services meet the rigorous technical demands of military operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)

Address: 2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD, FORT WALTON BE, FL, 32547

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,420,472

Exercised Options: $23,420,472

Current Obligation: $23,420,472

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785402A9017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-12-14

Current End Date: 2013-06-14

Potential End Date: 2013-06-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-08-05

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending