DoD's $11.96M waste collection contract awarded to Phillips and Jordan, Inc. in 2006

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,964,587 ($12.0M)

Contractor: Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-27

End Date: 2006-06-30

Contract Duration: 95 days

Daily Burn Rate: $125.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70130

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.0 million to PHILLIPS AND JORDAN, INCORPORATED for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $11.96M for waste collection services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 95 days. 4. Fixed-price contract type suggests predictable costs. 5. Service area includes Louisiana. 6. Contractor: Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated. 7. NAICS code 562119 indicates 'Other Waste Collection'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.96M for a 95-day period of performance for waste collection appears high. Without specific details on the volume of waste or the scope of services, it is difficult to benchmark effectively. However, the short duration and the nature of the service suggest that the per-diem cost is substantial. Further analysis would require understanding the specific requirements and comparing them to industry standards for similar emergency or temporary waste management operations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 22 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally benefits price discovery and can lead to more favorable terms for the government. The exclusion of sources clause might indicate specific requirements that narrowed the initial pool, but the overall competition level appears robust.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging contractors to offer their best value.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from essential waste collection services. Ensures environmental compliance and public health standards are met. Services were delivered within Louisiana. The contract supported the workforce of Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High contract value for a short duration may warrant further scrutiny of cost-effectiveness.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause, while potentially justified, could limit competition and should be understood in context.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified bidders.
The large number of bids (22) suggests significant market interest and a competitive process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Waste Management and Remediation Services sector, specifically 'Other Waste Collection.' This sector is crucial for public health and environmental protection. While specific market size data for this niche is not provided, the broader waste management industry is substantial. This contract represents a specific, short-term need for the Department of the Army, likely related to a particular operation or event, rather than ongoing municipal services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses were likely not the primary focus of this award. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically be managed through the contracting officer and relevant program management offices within the Army. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Contracts
Waste Management Services
Federal Procurement
Army Contracts
Emergency Services Contracts

Risk Flags

High cost for short duration
Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.0 million to PHILLIPS AND JORDAN, INCORPORATED. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PHILLIPS AND JORDAN, INCORPORATED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-27. End: 2006-06-30.

What was the specific operational context or event that necessitated this $11.96M waste collection contract for a 95-day period?

The provided data does not specify the exact operational context or event that led to this contract award. However, contracts of this magnitude for short durations in waste collection often relate to emergency response, disaster relief, military exercises, or temporary base operations where standard municipal services are insufficient or unavailable. The Department of the Army might have required these services for a specific mission, a contingency operation, or a large-scale training event in Louisiana. Without further documentation, the precise reason remains speculative, but it points to a significant, time-bound requirement.

How does the per-diem cost of this contract compare to typical emergency waste management services?

Calculating a precise per-diem cost requires dividing the total contract value ($11,964,587) by the duration (95 days), resulting in approximately $126,000 per day. Benchmarking this against typical emergency waste management services is challenging without detailed scope information. Emergency services often command premium pricing due to rapid deployment needs, specialized equipment, and potential hazards. If this contract involved large-scale debris removal post-disaster or managing significant volumes of hazardous waste, the daily rate might be within a reasonable range for such critical, time-sensitive operations. However, for standard waste collection, this daily rate would be exceptionally high, suggesting non-standard requirements.

What does 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' imply for this contract's procurement process?

This procurement method, 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicates that the agency initially intended to solicit offers from all responsible sources but then excluded certain sources based on specific, documented criteria before the final solicitation. This could happen if, for example, only a limited number of contractors possessed the necessary specialized equipment, security clearances, or geographic presence required for the task. While it still aims for broad competition, the exclusion suggests that the agency had predefined requirements that narrowed the field. The fact that 22 bids were received implies that even with exclusions, a substantial number of capable contractors remained interested and competitive.

What is the significance of the NAICS code 562119 ('Other Waste Collection') in the context of this contract?

The NAICS code 562119, 'Other Waste Collection,' signifies that the contract's primary purpose was not standard municipal solid waste collection (which falls under different codes like 562111 for solid waste collection). This code typically covers specialized waste collection services, such as hazardous waste, construction and demolition debris, or industrial waste. Given the contract's value and duration, it's plausible that Phillips and Jordan, Inc. was contracted for a specific type of waste requiring specialized handling, transport, or disposal, potentially related to military operations or environmental remediation efforts in Louisiana.

Were there any specific performance metrics or quality standards outlined in the contract?

The provided summary data does not include details on specific performance metrics or quality standards. However, for a federal contract, especially one involving waste management, it is standard practice to include clauses related to performance expectations, delivery schedules, environmental compliance, and safety protocols. The 'Firm Fixed Price' nature of the contract implies that the contractor is obligated to perform the specified services to the government's satisfaction within the agreed price. Failure to meet performance standards could lead to contract remedies, including termination or withholding of payment, depending on the severity of the deficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Waste Collection › Other Waste Collection

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Phillips Heavy, Inc (UEI: 003845336)

Address: 8940 GALL BLVD, ZEPHYRHILLS, FL, 15

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912P805D0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline